World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 70 715 659 61 55 244 16813

Ralf Oelmüller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ralf Oelmüller between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ralf Oelmüller published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2022. 14 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2022. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications
1969 2025

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ralf Oelmüller: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 3
1986 3
1987 5
1988 6
1989 3
1990 1
1991 4
1992 2
1993 5
1994 8
1995 8
1996 5
1997 0
1998 4
1999 5
2000 6
2001 9
2002 4
2003 4
2004 7
2005 8
2006 4
2007 5
2008 7
2009 7
2010 6
2011 7
2012 7
2013 11
2014 7
2015 8
2016 4
2017 6
2018 10
2019 10
2020 7
2021 13
2022 15
2023 12
2024 9
2025 5
Total 264
Download as CSV

Ralf Oelmüller publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf Oelmüller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–245 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 244 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39 244
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Ralf Oelmüller D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf Oelmüller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40 70
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Ralf Oelmüller is affiliated with Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany. Their research primarily covers Agricultural and Biological Sciences with a substantial focus on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these broader areas, their work is concentrated in several specialized subfields including Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Insect Science.

The scientist's research topics encompass various aspects of plant biology and interactions, including:

  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Oelmüller has published extensively, with notable frequent venues including the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Frontiers in Plant Science, Plant Signaling & Behavior, Plants, and Scientific Reports.

Several recent papers by Oelmüller and collaborators include:

  • "Harnessing Bacterial Endophytes for Promotion of Plant Growth and Biotechnological Applications: An Overview" (2021), published in Plants
  • "Fungal Endophyte-Mediated Crop Improvement: The Way Ahead" (2020), published in Frontiers in Plant Science
  • "An endophyte from salt-adapted Pokkali rice confers salt-tolerance to a salt-sensitive rice variety and targets a unique pattern of genes in its new host" (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Piriformospora indica symbiosis improves water stress tolerance of rice through regulating stomata behavior and ROS scavenging systems" (2020), published in Plant Signaling & Behavior
  • "An Endophytic Trichoderma Strain Promotes Growth of Its Hosts and Defends Against Pathogen Attack" (2020), published in Frontiers in Plant Science

Oelmüller has collaborated extensively with researchers such as Michael Reichelt, Sandra S. Scholz, Alexandra C. U. Furch, Karaba N. Nataraja, and Yu-Heng Tseng.

In addition to journal publications, Oelmüller has contributed to the book titled "Signal Transduction of Plant Organ Senescence and Cell Death" published by Frontiers Media in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants

    Baishnab Charan Tripathy;Ralf Oelmüller

  • WRKY transcription factors: Jack of many trades in plants

    Madhunita Bakshi;Ralf Oelmüller

  • pTAC2, -6, and -12 Are Components of the Transcriptionally Active Plastid Chromosome That Are Required for Plastid Gene Expression

    Jeannette Pfalz;Karsten Liere;Andrea Kandlbinder;Karl-Josef Dietz

  • Piriformospora indica confers drought tolerance in Chinese cabbage leaves by stimulating antioxidant enzymes, the expression of drought-related genes and the plastid-localized CAS protein

    Chao Sun;Joy Michal Johnson;Daguang Cai;Irena Sherameti

  • Association of Piriformospora indica with Arabidopsis thaliana roots represents a novel system to study beneficial plant–microbe interactions and involves early plant protein modifications in the endoplasmic reticulum and at the plasma membrane

    Tatjana Peškan‐Berghöfer;Bationa Shahollari;Pham Huong Giong;Solveig Hehl

  • The Endophytic Fungus Piriformospora indica Stimulates the Expression of Nitrate Reductase and the Starch-degrading Enzyme Glucan-water Dikinase in Tobacco and Arabidopsis Roots through a Homeodomain Transcription Factor That Binds to a Conserved Motif in Their Promoters

    Irena Sherameti;Bationa Shahollari;Yvonne Venus;Lothar Altschmied

  • Piriformospora indica, a cultivable root endophyte with multiple biotechnological applications.

    Ralf Oelmüller;Irena Sherameti;Swati Tripathi;Ajit Varma

  • A Novel Mechanism of Nuclear Photosynthesis Gene Regulation by Redox Signals from the Chloroplast during Photosystem Stoichiometry Adjustment

    Thomas Pfannschmidt;Katia Schütze;Meta Brost;Ralf Oelmüller

  • The role of auxins and cytokinins in the mutualistic interaction between Arabidopsis and Piriformospora indica

    Jyothilakshmi Vadassery;Claudia Ritter;Yvonne Venus;Iris Camehl

  • Photooxidative destruction of chloroplasts and its consequences for expression of nuclear genes.

    R. Oelmüller;H. Mohr

  • Retrograde Plastid Redox Signals in the Expression of Nuclear Genes for Chloroplast Proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana

    Vidal Fey;Raik Wagner;Katharina Braütigam;Markus Wirtz

  • The root-colonizing endophyte Pirifomospora indica confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by stimulating the expression of drought stress-related genes in leaves.

    Irena Sherameti;Swati Tripathi;Ajit Varma;Ralf Oelmüller

  • Expression of nuclear genes as affected by treatments acting on the plastids.

    R. Oelmüller;I. Levitan;R. Bergfeld;V. K. Rajasekhar

  • Ethylene signalling and ethylene-targeted transcription factors are required to balance beneficial and nonbeneficial traits in the symbiosis between the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica and Arabidopsis thaliana

    Iris Camehl;Irena Sherameti;Yvonne Venus;Gerit Bethke

  • PHOTOOXIDATIVE DESTRUCTION OF CHLOROPLASTS AND ITS EFFECT ON NUCLEAR GENE EXPRESSION AND EXTRAPLASTIDIC ENZYME LEVELS *

    Unknown

  • Identification of low-density Triton X-100-insoluble plasma membrane microdomains in higher plants.

    Tatjana Peskan;Martin Westermann;Ralf Oelmüller

  • A cell wall extract from the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica promotes growth of Arabidopsis seedlings and induces intracellular calcium elevation in roots.

    Jyothilakshmi Vadassery;Stefanie Ranf;Corinna Drzewiecki;Axel Mithöfer

  • Harnessing Bacterial Endophytes for Promotion of Plant Growth and Biotechnological Applications: An Overview

    Ahmed M. Eid;Amr Fouda;Mohamed Ali Abdel-Rahman;Salem S. Salem

  • Principles of redox control in photosynthesis gene expression

    Thomas Pfannschmidt;John F. Allen;Ralf Oelmüller

  • Expression of a receptor kinase in Arabidopsis roots is stimulated by the basidiomycete Piriformospora indica and the protein accumulates in Triton X-100 insoluble plasma membrane microdomains

    Bationa Shahollari;Ajit Varma;Ralf Oelmüller

  • Growth Promotion of Chinese Cabbage and Arabidopsis by Piriformospora indica Is Not Stimulated by Mycelium-Synthesized Auxin

    Yin-Chen Lee;Joy Michael Johnson;Ching-Te Chien;Chao Sun

  • The root endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica leads to early flowering, higher biomass and altered secondary metabolites of the medicinal plant, Coleus forskohlii

    Aparajita Das;Shwet Kamal;Najam Akhtar Shakil;Irena Sherameti

  • The OXI1 Kinase Pathway Mediates Piriformospora indica-Induced Growth Promotion in Arabidopsis

    Iris Camehl;Corinna Drzewiecki;Jyothilakshmi Vadassery;Bationa Shahollari

  • A leucine-rich repeat protein is required for growth promotion and enhanced seed production mediated by the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Bationa Shahollari;Jyothilakshmi Vadassery;Ajit Varma;Ralf Oelmüller

Frequent Co-Authors

Ajit Varma
Ajit Varma Amity University
Michael Reichelt
Michael Reichelt Max Planck Society
François Buscot
François Buscot Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Axel Mithöfer
Axel Mithöfer Max Planck Society
Narendra Tuteja
Narendra Tuteja International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Reinhold G. Herrmann
Reinhold G. Herrmann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jörg Meurer
Jörg Meurer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ian T. Baldwin
Ian T. Baldwin Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
Karaba N. Nataraja
Karaba N. Nataraja Bangalore University
Jonathan Gershenzon
Jonathan Gershenzon Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Biology and Biochemistry opens up a wide range of career options in healthcare and research. Many students with science backgrounds look into adjacent fields such as Health Information Management (HIM), medical billing, and coding. If you are interested in data-driven roles within the health sector, you may want to consider affordable online him programs that teach essential skills in managing patient health information.

For those leaning toward medical coding, it's important to understand ccs vs cpc certification. These certifications have different pathways, costs, and salary prospects, so research your options before enrolling. You may also wonder how much does a medical coder make. Salaries can vary based on your certification and experience, but medical coding remains a competitive and stable field.

Is it worth entering this sector? Many people ask, is medical billing and coding a good career? It offers strong job security, flexibility, and the potential to work remotely, but it's also detail-oriented and can be challenging. Weigh the pros and cons carefully to decide if this pathway is right for you.

Best Scientists Citing Ralf Oelmüller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles