World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
31771
World Ranking
17378
National Ranking
578

Guy Meyer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Meyer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 350 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Guy Meyer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Meyer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guy Meyer was affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France. Their research focused predominantly on medicine, with a significant body of work in internal medicine and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Additional areas of study included emergency medical services, surgery, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist contributed extensively to topics related to venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, and central venous catheters and hemodialysis. Other areas covered in their research comprised acute myocardial infarction, acute ischemic stroke management, diagnosis and treatment of venous diseases, and cardiac tumors and thrombi.

Guy Meyer's publication record included work in key venues within the thrombosis and cardiovascular research community, such as:

  • Thrombosis Research
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualités
  • Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • New England Journal of Medicine

Their frequent co-authors were:

  • Philippe Girard
  • Laurent Bertoletti
  • Olivier Sanchez
  • Françis Couturaud
  • Silvy Laporte

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Guy Meyer included:

  • Apixaban for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Optimal follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism: a position paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function, in collaboration with the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, endorsed by the European Respiratory Society, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Rivaroxaban vs Dalteparin in Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism, 2021, CHEST Journal
  • Triaging acute pulmonary embolism for home treatment by Hestia or simplified PESI criteria: the HOME-PE randomized trial, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Second consensus document on diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis: updated document elaborated by the ESC Working Group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and the ESC Working Group on pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function, 2021, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Best Publications

  • 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European respiratory society (ERS)

    Stavros Konstantinides;Guy Meyer;Cecilia Becattini;Héctor Bueno

  • Fibrinolysis for Patients with Intermediate- Risk Pulmonary Embolism

    Guy Meyer;Eric Vicaut;Thierry Danays;Giancarlo Agnelli

  • Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

    Gary E. Raskob;Nick van Es;Peter Verhamme;Marc Carrier

  • 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) : The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Stavros V. Konstantinides;Guy Meyer;Cecilia Becattini;Héctor Bueno

  • Hormone Therapy and Venous Thromboembolism Among Postmenopausal Women Impact of the Route of Estrogen Administration and Progestogens: The ESTHER Study

    Marianne Canonico;Emmanuel Oger;Geneviève Plu-Bureau;Jacqueline Conard

  • Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

    Arnaud Perrier;Pierre-Marie Roy;Olivier Sanchez;Grégoire Le Gal

  • Apixaban for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer

    Giancarlo Agnelli;Cecilia Becattini;Guy Meyer;Andres Muñoz

  • Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with haemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.

    Olivier Sanchez;Ludovic Trinquart;Isabelle Colombet;Isabelle Colombet;Pierre Durieux;Pierre Durieux

  • Systemic thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Christophe Alberic Marti;Gregor Raphaël John;Stavros Konstantinides;Christophe Combescure

  • Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study

    Dominique Musset;Florence Parent;Guy Meyer;Sophie Maître

  • Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism

    A Torbicki;Edwin Jacques Rudolph van Beek;B Charbonnier;G Meyer

  • Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Marc Righini;Grégoire Le Gal;Drahomir Aujesky;Pierre-Marie Roy

  • Role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH.

    Alok A. Khorana;S. Noble;A. Y.Y. Lee;G. Soff

  • Prospective validation of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. A clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism.

    Jacques Donze;Gregoire Le Gal;Michael J. Fine;Pierre-Marie Roy

  • Trends in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Analysis From the RIETE Registry.

    David Jiménez;Javier de Miguel-Díez;Ricardo Guijarro;Javier Trujillo-Santos

  • Prevalence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. Prevalence of CTEPH after pulmonary embolism.

    Laurent Guérin;Francis Couturaud;Florence Parent;Marie-Pierre Revel

  • Management of Pulmonary Embolism: An Update.

    Stavros V. Konstantinides;Stefano Barco;Mareike Lankeit;Guy Meyer

  • Validation of a model to predict adverse outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism.

    Drahomir Aujesky;Pierre-Marie Roy;Cédric Petit Le Manach;Franck Verschuren

  • Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Warfarin for the Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer

    Guy Meyer;Zora Marjanovic;Judith Valcke;Bernard Lorcerie

  • Role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH

    Khorana Aa;Noble S;Lee Ayy;Soff G

Frequent Co-Authors

Stavros Konstantinides
Stavros Konstantinides Democritus University of Thrace
Alok A. Khorana
Alok A. Khorana Cleveland Clinic
Arnaud Perrier
Arnaud Perrier Geneva College
Gilles Chatellier
Gilles Chatellier Université Paris Cité
Menno V. Huisman
Menno V. Huisman Leiden University Medical Center
Walter Ageno
Walter Ageno University of Insubria
Adam Torbicki
Adam Torbicki Center for Postgraduate Medical Education at ECZ-Otwock
Philip S. Wells
Philip S. Wells Ottawa Hospital
Gérald Simonneau
Gérald Simonneau University of Paris-Saclay
Marc Carrier
Marc Carrier Ottawa Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have more options than ever with flexible online programs. For students interested in patient care, nursing programs without TEAS or HESI exam requirements can simplify entry into the nursing field, making it accessible for motivated learners who want to start their careers quickly.

Those looking to take on leadership or administrative roles might consider earning a degree from one of the best online healthcare administration degree programs. These fast-track programs equip students with critical management and organizational skills relevant for hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

For registered nurses wanting to advance, transitioning from RN to family nurse practitioner is possible through ASN to FNP programs. These bridge programs are designed for working nurses seeking advanced practice roles while balancing job and education.

An interest in wellness, diet, and public health can be pursued via online nutrition degree programs. This field blends science with practical skills, preparing graduates for diverse roles in nutrition counseling, research, and health promotion.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Meyer

Recently Published Articles