What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Operating system
- Programming language
- Computer network
His primary areas of study are Distributed computing, Computer security, Operating system, Computer network and Programming language.
Andrew S. Tanenbaum studies Distributed computing, focusing on Distributed operating system in particular.
His study in Computer security is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Crash, Line, Mobile computing and Internet privacy.
His work on Address space, Software and Self-certifying File System as part of general Operating system research is frequently linked to Multiversion concurrency control and Optimistic concurrency control, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
The various areas that Andrew S. Tanenbaum examines in his Computer network study include Application software and Data structure.
The concepts of his The Internet study are interwoven with issues in Replication and Middleware.
His most cited work include:
- Modern Operating Systems (1554 citations)
- Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms (1427 citations)
- Distributed Operating Systems (1160 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Distributed computing, Operating system, Computer security, Computer network and Programming language.
His biological study focuses on Replication.
Andrew S. Tanenbaum frequently studies issues relating to Embedded system and Operating system.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mobile computing and Internet privacy.
He studied Distributed object and Middleware that intersect with World Wide Web.
Andrew S. Tanenbaum has included themes like Embedded operating system and Amoeba in his Distributed operating system study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Distributed computing (32.02%)
- Operating system (23.87%)
- Computer security (15.41%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2007-2017)?
- Operating system (23.87%)
- Distributed computing (32.02%)
- Computer security (15.41%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Andrew S. Tanenbaum focuses on Operating system, Distributed computing, Computer security, Embedded system and Dependability.
As part of one scientific family, Andrew S. Tanenbaum deals mainly with the area of Operating system, narrowing it down to issues related to the Reliability, and often Process.
Particularly relevant to Fault tolerance is his body of work in Distributed computing.
His studies deal with areas such as Ubiquitous computing and Internet privacy as well as Computer security.
His research investigates the connection between Embedded system and topics such as Software fault tolerance that intersect with issues in Fault indicator and Segmentation fault.
His work deals with themes such as Resource and Message passing, which intersect with Dependability.
Between 2007 and 2017, his most popular works were:
- Distributed Operating Systems (1160 citations)
- Enhanced operating system security through efficient and fine-grained address space randomization (199 citations)
- Classifying RFID attacks and defenses (149 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Operating system
- Programming language
- The Internet
His primary scientific interests are in Distributed computing, Operating system, Computer security, Software and Dependability.
His work in the fields of Distributed design patterns overlaps with other areas such as Context.
His Distributed design patterns study combines topics in areas such as File server, Distributed operating system and File management.
His study in the field of Server, Scalability and Compiler is also linked to topics like Flexibility.
His Computer security research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Ubiquitous computing, Redundancy and Middleware.
His Software research includes themes of Digital rights management, Policy enforcement and Access control.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
