World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 45 16317 14726 4066 3337 202 8817

Carolyn I. Pearce publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carolyn I. Pearce between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carolyn I. Pearce published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2025. 43 of the 328 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2025. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 41 publications 2026: 2 publications
2003 2026

328 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carolyn I. Pearce: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 1
2005 0
2006 6
2007 7
2008 8
2009 8
2010 7
2011 6
2012 8
2013 6
2014 4
2015 5
2016 9
2017 9
2018 29
2019 20
2020 28
2021 32
2022 35
2023 28
2024 27
2025 41
2026 2
Total 328
Download as CSV

Carolyn I. Pearce publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn I. Pearce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 202 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281 202
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Carolyn I. Pearce D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn I. Pearce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808 45
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Carolyn I. Pearce is affiliated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on materials science, with a significant number of publications in related subfields such as materials chemistry, inorganic chemistry, industrial and manufacturing engineering, mechanical engineering, and atomic and molecular physics and optics.

The scientist's work covers several main topics that include:

  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Nuclear materials and radiation effects
  • Chemical synthesis and characterization
  • Iron oxide chemistry and applications
  • Bauxite residue and utilization
  • Spectroscopy and quantum chemical studies
  • Clay minerals and soil interactions

Carolyn I. Pearce has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Kevin M. Rosso (75 joint publications)
  • Trent R. Graham (41 joint publications)
  • Xin Zhang (32 joint publications)
  • Zhe-Ming Wang (31 joint publications)
  • José Marcial (30 joint publications)

The main venues where their work has been published most often are:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) with 23 publications
  • Environmental Science & Technology with 8 publications
  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry with 7 publications
  • npj Materials Degradation with 5 publications
  • Inorganic Chemistry with 5 publications

The following papers highlight some of their recent scholarly contributions, including titles, publication years, and venues:

  • Polystyrene nano- and microplastic accumulation at Arabidopsis and wheat root cap cells, but no evidence for uptake into roots, 2020, Environmental Science Nano
  • Labile Fe(III) from sorbed Fe(II) oxidation is the key intermediate in Fe(II)-catalyzed ferrihydrite transformation, 2020, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  • Forty years of durability assessment of nuclear waste glass by standard methods, 2021, npj Materials Degradation
  • Accumulation of microplastics in soil after long-term application of biosolids and atmospheric deposition, 2023, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Attosecond-pump attosecond-probe x-ray spectroscopy of liquid water, 2024, Science

Best Publications

  • The removal of colour from textile wastewater using whole bacterial cells: a review

    C.I. Pearce;J.R. Lloyd;J.T. Guthrie

  • Redox cycling of Fe(II) and Fe(III) in magnetite by Fe-metabolizing bacteria.

    James M. Byrne;Nicole Klueglein;Carolyn Pearce;Carolyn Pearce;Kevin M. Rosso

  • Electrical and magnetic properties of sulfides

    Carolyn I. Pearce;Richard A.D. Pattrick;David J. Vaughan

  • Successful Decontamination of 99 TcO 4 − in Groundwater at Legacy Nuclear Sites by a Cationic Metal‑Organic Framework with Hydrophobic Pockets

    Daopeng Sheng;Lin Zhu;Xing Dai;Chao Xu

  • XAS and XMCD evidence for species-dependent partitioning of arsenic during microbial reduction of ferrihydrite to magnetite.

    V. S. Coker;A. G. Gault;C. I. Pearce;G. van der Laan

  • Copper oxidation state in chalcopyrite: Mixed Cu d9 and d10 characteristics

    C.I. Pearce;R.A.D. Pattrick;D.J. Vaughan;C.M.B. Henderson;C.M.B. Henderson

  • Reactive azo dye reduction by Shewanella strain J18 143.

    Carolyn I. Pearce;Carolyn I. Pearce;Robert Christie;Christopher Boothman;Harald von Canstein

  • Investigating different mechanisms for biogenic selenite transformations: Geobacter sulfurreducens , Shewanella oneidensis and Veillonella atypica

    Carolyn I. Pearce;Richard A.D. Pattrick;Nicholas Law;John M. Charnock

  • Harnessing the Extracellular Bacterial Production of Nanoscale Cobalt Ferrite with Exploitable Magnetic Properties

    Victoria S. Coker;Neil D. Telling;Gerrit van der Laan;Richard A. D. Pattrick

  • Labile Fe(III) from sorbed Fe(II) oxidation is the key intermediate in Fe(II)-catalyzed ferrihydrite transformation

    Anxu Sheng;Juan Liu;Xiaoxu Li;Odeta Qafoku

  • Microbial manufacture of chalcogenide-based nanoparticles via the reduction of selenite using Veillonella atypica: an in situ EXAFS study.

    Carolyn I Pearce;Victoria S Coker;John M Charnock;John M Charnock;Richard A D Pattrick

  • Microbial engineering of nanoheterostructures: biological synthesis of a magnetically recoverable palladium nanocatalyst.

    Victoria S Coker;James A Bennett;Neil D Telling;Neil D Telling;Torsten Henkel

  • Reaction of water-saturated supercritical CO2 with forsterite: Evidence for magnesite formation at low temperatures

    Andrew R. Felmy;Odeta Qafoku;Bruce W. Arey;Jian Zhi Hu

  • Size and Morphology Controlled Synthesis of Boehmite Nanoplates and Crystal Growth Mechanisms

    Xin Zhang;Wenwen Cui;Wenwen Cui;Katharine L. Page;Carolyn I. Pearce

  • Optimizing Cr(VI) and Tc(VII) remediation through nanoscale biomineral engineering.

    Richard S Cutting;Victoria S Coker;Neil D Telling;Richard L Kimber

  • Technetium immobilization by materials through sorption and redox-driven processes: A literature review.

    Robert C. Moore;Carolyn I. Pearce;Joseph W. Morad;Sayandev Chatterjee

  • Today's wastes, tomorrow's materials for environmental protection

    L.E. Macaskie;I.P. Mikheenko;P. Yong;K. Deplanche

  • The Role of Defects in Fe(II)–Goethite Electron Transfer

    Luiza Notini;Drew E. Latta;Anke Neumann;Carolyn I. Pearce

  • Boehmite and Gibbsite Nanoplates for the Synthesis of Advanced Alumina Products

    Xin Zhang;Patricia L. Huestis;Carolyn I. Pearce;Jian Zhi Hu

  • Synthesis and properties of titanomagnetite (Fe3-xTixO4) nanoparticles: A tunable solid-state Fe(II/III) redox system

    Carolyn Pearce;O. Qafoku;J. Liu;E. Arenholz

  • Fe site occupancy in magnetite-ulvöspinel solid solutions: A new approach using X-ray magnetic circular dichroism

    Carolyn I. Pearce;C. Michael B. Henderson;C. Michael B. Henderson;Neil D. Telling;Richard A.D. Pattrick

  • Direct determination of cation site occupancies in natural ferrite spinels by L2,3 X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism

    Carolyn I. Pearce;C. Michael B. Henderson;C. Michael B. Henderson;Richard A.D. Pattrick;Gerrit van der Laan

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin M. Rosso
Kevin M. Rosso Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Richard A. D. Pattrick
Richard A. D. Pattrick University of Manchester
Jonathan R. Lloyd
Jonathan R. Lloyd University of Manchester
Mark E. Bowden
Mark E. Bowden Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Elke Arenholz
Elke Arenholz Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Xin Zhang
Xin Zhang Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Gregory K. Schenter
Gregory K. Schenter Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
John M. Charnock
John M. Charnock University of Manchester
Steve M. Heald
Steve M. Heald Argonne National Laboratory
Bruce W. Arey
Bruce W. Arey Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Chemistry in the USA opens numerous career pathways, many of which can be enhanced with specialized online education. For example, students interested in healthcare might explore how long does it take to become a pharmacist, gaining insights into the required years of study and licensure. This pathway highlights the importance of rigorous academic preparation combined with practical experience.

For those drawn to forensic applications of chemistry, programs like a forensic science bachelor degree online provide accessible routes to enter this dynamic field. These degrees often combine chemistry with criminal justice, offering practical skills relevant to law enforcement and legal investigations.

Another promising option is to become a medical examiner assistant. Understanding how to become a medical examiner assistant can help students plan education and training that bridges chemistry and forensic pathology, supporting legal investigations through scientific expertise.

Furthermore, combining chemistry knowledge with psychology can lead to specialized careers in forensic psychology. A masters in forensic psychology online equips graduates with the skills to analyze criminal behavior, complementing scientific backgrounds and broadening professional opportunities.

Exploring these related fields through online degrees offers flexibility and targeted learning designed for career development. Each pathway integrates chemistry principles differently, allowing students to tailor their education to their ambitions and the evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Carolyn I. Pearce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles