World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
19781
World Ranking
3200
National Ranking
1235

Jonathan Sanderman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Sanderman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jonathan Sanderman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Sanderman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Sanderman is affiliated with the Woods Hole Research Center in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Environmental Science, with a significant focus on subfields such as Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Soil Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Analytical Chemistry.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics including Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Soil Geostatistics and Mapping, Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, and Fire Effects on Ecosystems.

Jonathan Sanderman has contributed to several research publications, with recent papers including:

  • The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions, 2020, Nature Sustainability
  • Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Land-based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Protecting irrecoverable carbon in Earth's ecosystems, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Future carbon emissions from global mangrove forest loss, 2021, Global Change Biology

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers including José Lucas Safanelli, Tomislav Hengl, Yufeng Ge, Leandro Parente, and Colleen Smith.

Jonathan Sanderman's publications have appeared in several venues multiple times. Notable publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoderma
  • Global Change Biology
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Biogeochemistry

Best Publications

  • Natural climate solutions

    Bronson W. Griscom;Bronson W. Griscom;Justin Adams;Peter W. Ellis;Richard A. Houghton

  • Australian vegetated coastal ecosystems as global hotspots for climate change mitigation

    Oscar Serrano;Catherine E. Lovelock;Trisha B. Atwood;Trisha B. Atwood;Peter I. Macreadie

  • Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use

    Jonathan Sanderman;Tomislav Hengl;Gregory J. Fiske

  • The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions

    D. A. Bossio;S. C. Cook-Patton;P. W. Ellis;J. Fargione

  • Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy.

    W Amelung;W Amelung;D Bossio;W de Vries;I Kögel-Knabner

  • Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: Integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry

    Noah W. Sokol;Noah W. Sokol;Jonathan Sanderman;Mark A. Bradford

  • Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world

    Stephanie Roe;Charlotte Streck;Michael Obersteiner;Stefan Frank

  • Natural climate solutions for the United States.

    Joseph E. Fargione;Steven Bassett;Timothy Boucher;Scott D. Bridgham

  • Land-based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country.

    Stephanie Roe;Charlotte Streck;Robert Beach;Jonah Busch

  • A global map of mangrove forest soil carbon at 30 m spatial resolution

    Jonathan Sanderman;Tomislav Hengl;Greg Fiske;Kylen Solvik

  • Long‐term carbon storage through retention of dissolved aromatic acids by reactive particles in soil

    Marc G. Kramer;Jonathan Sanderman;Oliver A. Chadwick;Jon Chorover

  • Global-change controls on soil-carbon accumulation and loss in coastal vegetated ecosystems

    Amanda C. Spivak;Jonathan Sanderman;Jennifer L. Bowen;Elizabeth A. Canuel

  • Protecting irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems

    Allie Goldstein;Will R. Turner;Seth A. Spawn;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira

  • The global significance of omitting soil erosion from soil organic carbon cycling schemes

    Adrian Chappell;Jeffrey Baldock;Jonathan Sanderman;Jonathan Sanderman

  • Soil carbon sequestration potential: a review for Australian agriculture.

    Jonathan Sanderman;Ryan Farquharson;Jeff Baldock

  • Microbial community structure mediates response of soil C decomposition to litter addition and warming

    Courtney A. Creamer;Alexandre B. de Menezes;Evelyn S. Krull;Jonathan Sanderman

  • Dissolved organic carbon chemistry and dynamics in contrasting forest and grassland soils

    Jonathan Sanderman;Jeffrey A. Baldock;Ronald Amundson

  • The global potential for increased storage of carbon on land

    Unknown

  • Predicting contents of carbon and its component fractions in Australian soils from diffuse reflectance mid-infrared spectra

    J. A. Baldock;B. Hawke;J. Sanderman;L. M. Macdonald

  • Salinity and sodicity affect soil respiration and dissolved organic matter dynamics differentially in soils varying in texture

    Manpreet S. Mavi;Manpreet S. Mavi;Petra Marschner;David J. Chittleborough;James W. Cox;James W. Cox

  • Accounting for soil carbon sequestration in national inventories: a soil scientist’s perspective

    Jonathan Sanderman;Jeffrey A Baldock

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff Baldock
Jeff Baldock Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Peter I. Macreadie
Peter I. Macreadie Deakin University
Ronald Amundson
Ronald Amundson University of California, Berkeley
Johannes Lehmann
Johannes Lehmann Cornell University
Mark Farrell
Mark Farrell Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Bronson W. Griscom
Bronson W. Griscom Conservation International
Kathleen A. Lohse
Kathleen A. Lohse Idaho State University
Joseph Fargione
Joseph Fargione The Nature Conservancy
Deborah A. Bossio
Deborah A. Bossio The Nature Conservancy
Rod M. Connolly
Rod M. Connolly Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various specialized fields that complement the broader study of the environment. For those interested in the Earth's physical structure and processes, pursuing an online geology degree offers valuable insights into natural resources, hazards, and conservation efforts.

Another crucial area is spatial data analysis, where Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a key role. Careers centered around environmental mapping and data interpretation benefit greatly from an in-depth understanding, which can be attained through a gis degree.

For those inclined toward leadership and policy-making in environmental organizations or government agencies, enrolling in one of the best online mpa programs can provide critical administrative skills and public management expertise required to effect change.

Lastly, understanding the social dimensions of environmental issues is vital. An accredited online bachelors in sociology equips students with knowledge about human behavior, societal trends, and community impact, enriching their approach to sustainable solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Sanderman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles