World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
30
Citations
8683
World Ranking
9665
National Ranking
3465

Naomi Naik publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Naik sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 47 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Naomi Naik D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Naik sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Naomi Naik is affiliated with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in the United States. The observatory is noted for its contributions to earth sciences and related fields.

There are no specific recorded publications, papers, or coauthors listed for Naomi Naik. Likewise, information about frequent publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, main topics, and awards is not available.

This profile is based solely on the available affiliation information without additional data on research contributions or scientific output.

Best Publications

  • Model Projections of an Imminent Transition to a More Arid Climate in Southwestern North America

    Richard Seager;Mingfang Ting;Isaac Held;Isaac Held;Yochanan Kushnir

  • Thermodynamic and Dynamic Mechanisms for Large-Scale Changes in the Hydrological Cycle in Response to Global Warming*

    Richard Seager;Naomi H. Naik;Gabriel A. Vecchi

  • Modeling of Tropical Forcing of Persistent Droughts and Pluvials over Western North America: 1856–2000*

    Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Celine Herweijer;Naomi H. Naik

  • Projections of Declining Surface-Water Availability for the Southwestern United States

    Richard Seager;Mingfang Ting;Cuihua Li;Naomi H. Naik

  • Is the Gulf Stream responsible for Europe's mild winters?

    Richard Seager;David S. Battisti;J. Yin;N. Gordon

  • Northern Hemisphere winter snow anomalies: ENSO, NAO and the winter of 2009/10

    Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Jennifer A. Nakamura;Mingfang Ting

  • Wind-Driven Shifts in the Latitude of the Kuroshio–Oyashio Extension and Generation of SST Anomalies on Decadal Timescales*

    Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Naomi H. Naik;Mark A. Cane

  • Mexican drought: an observational modeling and tree ring study of variability and climate change

    Richard Seager;Mingfang Ting;M. Davis;Mark A. Cane

  • Causes of Atlantic Ocean Climate Variability between 1958 and 1998

    Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Martin Visbeck;Naomi Naik

  • Mechanisms of Tropical Atlantic SST Influence on North American Precipitation Variability

    Yochanan Kushnir;Richard Seager;Mingfang Ting;Naomi H. Naik

  • An ocean model's response to north Atlantic Oscillation-like wind forcing

    Martin Visbeck;Heidi Cullen;Gerd Krahmann;Naomi Naik

  • Does Global Warming Cause Intensified Interannual Hydroclimate Variability

    Richard Seager;Naomi H. Naik;Laura Vogel

  • Air–Sea Interaction and the Seasonal Cycle of the Subtropical Anticyclones*

    Richard Seager;Ragu Murtugudde;Naomi H. Naik;Amy Clement

  • Warren revisited: Atmospheric freshwater fluxes and ''Why is no deep water formed in the North Pacific''

    Julien Emile-Geay;Julien Emile-Geay;Mark A. Cane;Naomi Naik;Richard Seager

  • Model Projections of an Imminent Transition to a More Arid Climate in

    Richard Seager;Mingfang Ting;Isaac Held;Yochanan Kushnir

  • Adjustment of the atmospheric circulation to tropical Pacific SST anomalies: Variability of transient eddy propagation in the Pacific–North America sector

    Richard Seager;Naomi H. Naik;Mingfang Ting;Mark A. Cane

  • Would Advance Knowledge of 1930s SSTs Have Allowed Prediction of the Dust Bowl Drought

    Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Mingfang Ting;Mark Cane

  • Tropical Oceanic Causes of Interannual to Multidecadal Precipitation Variability in Southeast South America over the Past Century

    Richard Seager;Naomi H. Naik;Walter E. Baethgen;Andrew W. Robertson

  • Tropical Pacific Forcing of North American Medieval Megadroughts: Testing the Concept with an Atmosphere Model Forced by Coral-Reconstructed SSTs*

    Richard Seager;Robert Burgman;Yochanan Kushnir;Amy Clement

  • Global adjustment of the thermocline in response to deepwater formation

    Rui X. Huang;Mark A. Cane;Naomi Naik;Paul Goodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Seager
Richard Seager Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Mark A. Cane
Mark A. Cane Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Yochanan Kushnir
Yochanan Kushnir Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Mingfang Ting
Mingfang Ting Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Amy C. Clement
Amy C. Clement University of Miami
Wilco Hazeleger
Wilco Hazeleger Utrecht University
Martin Visbeck
Martin Visbeck GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Gabriel A. Vecchi
Gabriel A. Vecchi Princeton University
Edward R. Cook
Edward R. Cook Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Isaac M. Held
Isaac M. Held Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with public policy, social dynamics, and educational leadership. For those interested in shaping environmental policies and managing public resources, the best online masters in public administration programs provide valuable skills in governance and administration.

Understanding social behavior and community impact is crucial in environmental work. A bachelors degree in sociology online complements environmental studies by offering insights into human interactions and societal trends, which are essential for effective environmental advocacy and sustainable development.

For professionals aiming to advance in educational roles or focus on environmental education leadership, exploring online edd no dissertation options can be appealing. These programs offer flexibility and specialization without the traditional dissertation requirement, making it easier to balance work and study.

Additionally, the best online eds to edd programs prepare educators to take on higher leadership roles, ideal for those looking to influence environmental curriculum development or policy implementation within academic institutions.

Best Scientists Citing Naomi Naik

Recently Published Articles