World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Spain
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
11332
World Ranking
5062
National Ranking
66

Jordi Cabot publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jordi Cabot sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 603 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jordi Cabot D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jordi Cabot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award

Overview

Jordi Cabot is affiliated with the Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with significant contributions across various subfields such as artificial intelligence, information systems, software engineering, computer networks and communications, and information systems management.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Cabot has published extensively with frequent appearances in venues like:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IEEE Software
  • The Journal of Object Technology

Some recent publications by Jordi Cabot include:

  • "Grand challenges in model-driven engineering: an analysis of the state of the research" (2020) in Software & Systems Modeling
  • "Xatkit: A Multimodal Low-Code Chatbot Development Framework" (2020) in IEEE Access
  • "Self-adaptive architectures in IoT systems: a systematic literature review" (2021) in Journal of Internet Services and Applications
  • "A Hitchhiker's Guide to Model-Driven Engineering for Data-Centric Systems" (2020) in IEEE Software
  • "A generic LSTM neural network architecture to infer heterogeneous model transformations" (2021) in Software & Systems Modeling

Their frequent co-authors include Javier Luis Izquierdo, Robert Clarisó, Adem Ait, Abel Gómez, and Iván Alfonso. These collaborations have contributed to a broad and interdisciplinary range within software engineering and related areas.

Jordi Cabot has also contributed to book publications, including a work published by Springer Science+Business Media titled "Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering" (2020).

Best Publications

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice

    Marco Brambilla;Jordi Cabot;Manuel Wimmer

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice

    Unknown

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice

    Unknown

  • MoDisco: a Model Driven Reverse Engineering Framework

    Hugo Brunelière;Jordi Cabot;Grégoire Dupé;Frédéric Madiot

  • Verification of UML/OCL Class Diagrams using Constraint Programming

    J. Cabot;R. Clariso;D. Riera

  • MoDisco: a generic and extensible framework for model driven reverse engineering

    Hugo Bruneliere;Jordi Cabot;Frédéric Jouault;Frédéric Madiot

  • UMLtoCSP: a tool for the formal verification of UML/OCL models using constraint programming

    Jordi Cabot;Robert Clarisó;Daniel Riera

  • Object constraint language (OCL): a definitive guide

    Jordi Cabot;Martin Gogolla

  • Verification and validation of declarative model-to-model transformations through invariants

    Jordi Cabot;Robert Clarisó;Esther Guerra;Juan de Lara

  • A research roadmap towards achieving scalability in model driven engineering

    Dimitrios S. Kolovos;Louis M. Rose;Nicholas Matragkas;Richard F. Paige

  • A Systematic Mapping Study of Software Development With GitHub

    Valerio Cosentino;Javier L. Canovas Izquierdo;Jordi Cabot

  • Grand challenges in model-driven engineering: an analysis of the state of the research

    Antonio Bucchiarone;Jordi Cabot;Richard F. Paige;Richard F. Paige;Alfonso Pierantonio

  • Xatkit: A Multimodal Low-Code Chatbot Development Framework

    Unknown

  • On the verification of UML/OCL class diagrams using constraint programming

    Jordi Cabot;Robert Clarisó;Daniel Riera

  • How do software architects consider non-functional requirements: An exploratory study

    David Ameller;Claudia Ayala;Jordi Cabot;Xavier Franch

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice: Second Edition

    Marco Brambilla;Jordi Cabot;Manuel Wimmer

  • From UML/OCL to SBVR specifications: A challenging transformation

    Jordi Cabot;Raquel Pau;Ruth Raventós

  • Incremental integrity checking of UML/OCL conceptual schemas

    Jordi Cabot;Ernest Teniente

  • EMFtoCSP: a tool for the lightweight verification of EMF models

    Carlos A. Gonzalez;Fabian Buttner;Robert Clariso;Jordi Cabot

  • Dealing with Non-Functional Requirements in Model-Driven Development

    David Ameller;Xavier Franch;Jordi Cabot

  • Verification of ATL transformations using transformation models and model finders

    Fabian Büttner;Marina Egea;Jordi Cabot;Martin Gogolla

  • Non-functional Requirements in Architectural Decision Making

    D. Ameller;C. Ayala;J. Cabot;X. Franch

  • Integrating sustainability in decision-making processes: A modelling strategy

    Jordi Cabot;Steve Easterbrook;Jennifer Horkoff;Lysanne Lessard

  • Findings from GitHub: methods, datasets and limitations

    Valerio Cosentino;Javier Luis Canovas Izquierdo;Jordi Cabot

Frequent Co-Authors

Frédéric Jouault
Frédéric Jouault École Supérieure d'Electronique de l'Ouest
Manuel Wimmer
Manuel Wimmer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Juan de Lara
Juan de Lara Autonomous University of Madrid
Esther Guerra
Esther Guerra Autonomous University of Madrid
Marco Brambilla
Marco Brambilla Polytechnic University of Milan
Xavier Franch
Xavier Franch Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Dimitrios S. Kolovos
Dimitrios S. Kolovos University of York
Martin Gogolla
Martin Gogolla University of Bremen
Antonio Vallecillo
Antonio Vallecillo University of Malaga
Steve Easterbrook
Steve Easterbrook University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative study routes in Computer Science can open unique opportunities for career growth and flexibility. Many students and professionals choose online programs for their convenience, affordability, and speed of completion.

If you're seeking to fast-track your education, consider the shortest masters degree programs, which allow you to earn a graduate credential in less time than traditional options. For those aiming for a stronger return on investment, reviewing what masters program should I do can help you target in-demand fields and maximize career outcomes.

Not ready for a full bachelor's or master's program? Online associate degree programs offer a solid foundation in computer science, often leading directly to entry-level positions or a pathway toward further study.

For those concerned about cost, consider the cheapest online degrees to find reputable programs that fit your budget while still preparing you for a dynamic technology career.

Best Scientists Citing Jordi Cabot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles