World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
11288
World Ranking
7820
National Ranking
176

Frédéric Jouault publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédéric Jouault sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 143 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frédéric Jouault D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédéric Jouault sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frédéric Jouault is affiliated with the École Supérieure d'Electronique de l'Ouest in France. Their research primarily focuses on areas within computer science, with significant contributions in software engineering and related subfields.

Their scholarly work covers several interconnected topics, including:

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research

Jouault's main fields of study and subfields reflect a strong focus on software development and computer networking, specifically:

  • Computer Science
  • Software
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Notable publication venues for Jouault include:

  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • Science of Computer Programming
  • OPUS (Augsburg University)

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Jouault are:

  • "Unified verification and monitoring of executable UML specifications" (2021), published in Software & Systems Modeling
  • "Coupling solvers with model transformations to generate explorable model sets" (2021), published in Software & Systems Modeling
  • "AnimUML as a UML Modeling and Verification Teaching Tool" (2021), published in the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • "Evaluating formal model verification tools in an industrial context: the case of a smart device life cycle management system" (2024), published in Software & Systems Modeling
  • "AnimUML: A practical tool for partial model animation and analysis" (2023), published in Science of Computer Programming

Frequent collaborators who have coauthored work with Jouault include:

  • Théo Le Calvar
  • Valentin Besnard
  • Ciprian Teodorov
  • Matthias Brun
  • Maxime Méré

Best Publications

  • ATL: A model transformation tool

    Frédéric Jouault;Freddy Allilaire;Jean Bézivin;Ivan Kurtev

  • Transforming models with ATL

    Frédéric Jouault;Ivan Kurtev

  • Transforming models with ATL

    Frédéric Jouault;Ivan Kurtev

  • KM3: a DSL for metamodel specification

    Frédéric Jouault;Jean Bézivin

  • Modeling in the large and modeling in the small

    Jean Bezivin;Frédéric Jouault;Peter Rosenthal;Patrick Valduriez

  • ATL: a QVT-like transformation language

    Frédéric Jouault;Freddy Allilaire;Jean Bézivin;Ivan Kurtev

  • TCS: a DSL for the specification of textual concrete syntaxes in model engineering

    Frédéric Jouault;Jean Bézivin;Ivan Kurtev

  • Model transformations? transformation models!

    Jean Bézivin;Fabian Büttner;Martin Gogolla;Frederic Jouault

  • On the architectural alignment of ATL and QVT

    Frédéric Jouault;Ivan Kurtev

  • First experiments with the ATL model transformation language: Transforming XSLT into XQuery

    Jean Bézivin;Grégoire Dupé;Frédéric Jouault;Gilles Pitette

  • Loosely Coupled Traceability for ATL

    Frédéric Jouault

  • MoDisco: a generic and extensible framework for model driven reverse engineering

    Hugo Bruneliere;Jordi Cabot;Frédéric Jouault;Frédéric Madiot

  • AMW: a generic model weaver

    Marcos Didonet del Fabro;Jean Bézivin;Frédéric Jouault;Erwann Breton

  • On the Need for Megamodels

    Jean Bézivin;Frédéric Jouault;Patrick Valduriez

  • On the Use of Higher-Order Model Transformations

    Massimo Tisi;Frédéric Jouault;Piero Fraternali;Stefano Ceri

  • Model-based DSL frameworks

    Ivan Kurtev;Jean Bézivin;Frédéric Jouault;Patrick Valduriez

  • DSMDiff: a differentiation tool for domain-specific models

    Yuehua Lin;Jeff Gray;Frédéric Jouault;Frédéric Jouault

  • Applying MDA approach for Web service platform

    J. Bezivin;S. Hammoudi;D. Lopes;F. Jouault

  • Managing Model Adaptation by Precise Detection of Metamodel Changes

    Kelly Garcés;Frédéric Jouault;Pierre Cointe;Jean Bézivin

  • A canonical scheme for model composition

    Jean Bézivin;Salim Bouzitouna;Marcos Didonet Del Fabro;Marie-Pierre Gervais

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Bézivin
Jean Bézivin University of Nantes
Jordi Cabot
Jordi Cabot Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Patrick Valduriez
Patrick Valduriez French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Jeff Gray
Jeff Gray University of Alabama
Martin Gogolla
Martin Gogolla University of Bremen
Davide Di Ruscio
Davide Di Ruscio University of L'Aquila
Alfonso Pierantonio
Alfonso Pierantonio University of L'Aquila
Marco Brambilla
Marco Brambilla Polytechnic University of Milan
Piero Fraternali
Piero Fraternali Polytechnic University of Milan
Dragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a flexible way to start or advance a career in computer science. Many students now consider beginning with an associate's degree online, which provides essential skills and a cost-effective entry point into the tech field.

For those eager to upskill quickly, numerous universities offer fastest masters degree online programs. These accelerated options mean you can often complete your master's qualifications in as little as 12 to 18 months, allowing for a quicker transition into more advanced roles.

If you’re aiming for high demand and long-term job security, it’s important to know which master's degree is most in demand in usa. Programs focused on areas such as data science, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence are currently leading the market.

Cost is also a significant factor. Finding the most affordable online colleges means you can minimize student debt while achieving your academic goals. Balancing affordability, speed, and relevance to industry needs is key to choosing the right pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Frédéric Jouault

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles