World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Keigo Endo

Keigo Endo

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
18540
World Ranking
18541
National Ranking
595

Keigo Endo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keigo Endo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 626 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Keigo Endo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keigo Endo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keigo Endo is affiliated with Gunma University in Japan. Their academic profile reflects an ongoing involvement in scientific research within this institution.

No recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are listed for Keigo Endo, which limits detailed insight into specific research outputs or collaborative networks.

There are no records of book publications or awards received by Keigo Endo available in the current data.

Similarly, information on primary fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work is not provided, which restricts a precise delineation of their research focus and thematic interests.

Keigo Endo is recorded as currently living, and the profile is presented in the present tense.

Best Publications

  • Usefulness of Fasting 18F-FDG PET in Identification of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

    Wataru Okumura;Tsutomu Iwasaki;Takuji Toyama;Tatsuya Iso

  • FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: standardized uptake value in 52 lesions.

    Jun Aoki;Hideomi Watanabe;Tetsuya Shinozaki;Kenji Takagishi

  • Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma.

    Hiroyuki Kato M.D.;Hiroyuki Kuwano M.D.;Masanobu Nakajima;Tatsuya Miyazaki

  • Familial Neonatal Transient Hypothyroidism Due to Maternal TSH-Binding Inhibitor Immunoglobulins

    Nobuo Matsuura;Yutaka Yamada;Yachiyo Nohara;Junji Konishi

  • Detection and properties of TSH-binding inhibitor immunoglobulins in patients with Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis.

    Keigo Endo;Kanji Kasagi;Junji Konishi;Katsuji Ikekubo

  • Evaluation of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography for gastric cancer.

    Erito Mochiki;Hiroyuki Kuwano;Hiroyuki Katoh;Takayuki Asao

  • The incremental effect of positron emission tomography on diagnostic accuracy in the initial staging of esophageal carcinoma

    Hiroyuki Kato M.D.;Tatsuya Miyazaki M.D.;Masanobu Nakajima M.D.;Junko Takita

  • The usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) and a comparison of (18)F-FDG-pet with (67)gallium scintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphoma: relation to histologic subtypes based on the World Health Organization classification.

    Norifumi Tsukamoto;Masaru Kojima;Masatoshi Hasegawa;Noboru Oriuchi

  • HPA axis dysfunction in unmedicated major depressive disorder and its normalization by pharmacotherapy correlates with alteration of neural activity in prefrontal cortex and limbic/paralimbic regions.

    Masako Aihara;Itsuro Ida;Naoya Yuuki;Akihiko Oshima

  • Brain microhemorrhages detected on T2*-weighted gradient-echo MR images.

    Yoshito Tsushima;Jun Aoki;Keigo Endo

  • A New Imaging Agent for Medullary Carcinoma of the Thyroid

    Hitoya Ohta;Kazutaka Yamamoto;Keigo Endo;Toru Mori

  • Sonography of Hashimoto's thyroiditis

    Nobushige Hayashi;Nagara Tamaki;Jugji Konishi;Yoshiharu Yonekura

  • Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T

    Yoshito Tsushima;Ayako Takahashi-Taketomi;Keigo Endo

  • Quantitative perfusion map of malignant liver tumors, created from dynamic computed tomography data1

    Yoshito Tsushima;Shintaro Funabasama;Jun Aoki;Shigeru Sanada

  • Usefulness of FDG-PET for early prediction of the response to gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer

    Noriaki Sunaga;Noboru Oriuchi;Kyoichi Kaira;Noriko Yanagitani

  • Primary Myxedema with Thyrotrophin-Binding Inhibitor Immunoglobulins: Clinical and Laboratory Findings in 15 Patients

    Konishi J;Iida Y;Kasagi K;Misaki T

  • Diagnostic Usefulness of Fluorine–18-α–Methyltyrosine Positron Emission Tomography in Combination With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose in Sarcoidosis Patients

    Kyoichi Kaira;Noboru Oriuchi;Yoshimi Otani;Noriko Yanagitani

  • Comparison of 11C-choline PET and FDG PET for the differential diagnosis of malignant tumors.

    Mei Tian;Hong Zhang;Hong Zhang;Noboru Oriuchi;Tetsuya Higuchi

  • Transport of 3-Fluoro-l-α-Methyl-Tyrosine by Tumor-Upregulated L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1: A Cause of the Tumor Uptake in PET

    Pattama Wiriyasermkul;Shushi Nagamori;Hideyuki Tominaga;Noboru Oriuchi

  • A sensitive and practical assay for thyroid-stimulating antibodies using crude immunoglobulin fractions precipitated with polyethylene glycol

    Kanji Kasagi;Junji Konishi;Keisuke Arai;Takashi Misaki

Frequent Co-Authors

Junji Konishi
Junji Konishi Kyoto University
Nagara Tamaki
Nagara Tamaki Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Yoshiharu Yonekura
Yoshiharu Yonekura Osaka University
Hiroyuki Kuwano
Hiroyuki Kuwano Gunma University
Akira Matsumori
Akira Matsumori International Society of Cardiomyopathy , Myocarditis, and Heart Failure
Masahiko Kurabayashi
Masahiko Kurabayashi Gunma University
Hiroto Hatabu
Hiroto Hatabu Brigham and Women's Hospital
Kanji Kuma
Kanji Kuma Kuma Hospital
Chuichi Kawai
Chuichi Kawai Kyoto University
Ryozo Nagai
Ryozo Nagai Jichi Medical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in medicine and healthcare careers grows, online degrees offer new opportunities for aspiring professionals. Beyond a traditional MD, healthcare administration is a fast-growing field, and you might want to explore which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? This accreditation ensures that your degree meets rigorous industry standards and can boost your career outlook.

For registered nurses looking to advance, there are now rn to bsn online programs without clinicals, making it more accessible for working professionals to earn a BSN without in-person commitments.

Nurses seeking a terminal degree should consider accelerated dnp programs online, which allow you to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice in a shorter time frame. If program rigor is a concern, you can also review options for the easiest dnp programs to find a suitable fit for your career goals and lifestyle.

Exploring these alternative online pathways can open doors to new roles in healthcare leadership, advanced nursing, and beyond—whether you’re just beginning your journey or seeking to further your education.

Best Scientists Citing Keigo Endo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles