World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kanji Kuma

Kanji Kuma

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 18143 17046 582 549 367 19529

Kanji Kuma publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kanji Kuma between 1957 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kanji Kuma published across 64 years, from 1957 to 2020, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2005. 1 of the 367 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2005. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 5 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 11 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 13 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 29 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 33 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1957 2020

367 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kanji Kuma: publications per year, 1957 to 2020
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 2
1977 1
1978 5
1979 7
1980 9
1981 8
1982 11
1983 7
1984 12
1985 13
1986 10
1987 11
1988 8
1989 14
1990 12
1991 9
1992 13
1993 8
1994 5
1995 13
1996 8
1997 6
1998 8
1999 15
2000 6
2001 9
2002 11
2003 29
2004 24
2005 33
2006 19
2007 10
2008 5
2009 2
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
Total 367
Download as CSV

Kanji Kuma publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kanji Kuma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 367 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 367
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kanji Kuma D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kanji Kuma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kanji Kuma is affiliated with Kuma Hospital in Japan. Their professional profile does not include recent papers, frequent co-authors, or detailed records of publication venues. Likewise, there are no listed book publications associated with their name.

Information about the main fields of study, subfields, and primary topics of research work for Kanji Kuma is not available. Additionally, no awards or honors have been recorded in relation to their career.

Despite the limited data on publications and research output, Kanji Kuma is identified as an active researcher who contributes to the scientific community through their association with Kuma Hospital.

Best Publications

  • An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid.

    Yasuhiro Ito;Takashi Uruno;Keiichi Nakano;Yuuki Takamura

  • Clinical Aspects of Primary Thyroid Lymphoma: Diagnosis and Treatment Based on Our Experience of 119 Cases

    Fumio Matsuzuka;Akira Miyauchi;Shoichi Katayama;Isamu Narabayashi

  • Papillary Microcarcinoma of the Thyroid: How Should It Be Treated?

    Yasuhiro Ito;Chisato Tomoda;Takashi Uruno;Yuuki Takamura

  • Clinical Significance of Metastasis to the Central Compartment from Papillary Microcarcinoma of the Thyroid

    Yasuhiro Ito;Chisato Tomoda;Takashi Uruno;Yuuki Takamura

  • Risk factors for recurrence to the lymph node in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients without preoperatively detectable lateral node metastasis: validity of prophylactic modified radical neck dissection.

    Yasuhiro Ito;Takuya Higashiyama;Yuuki Takamura;Akihiro Miya

  • Prognostic significance of extrathyroid extension of papillary thyroid carcinoma : Massive but not minimal extension affects the relapse-free survival

    Yasuhiro Ito;Chisato Tomoda;Takashi Uruno;Yuuki Takamura

  • Preoperative Ultrasonographic Examination for Lymph Node Metastasis: Usefulness when Designing Lymph Node Dissection for Papillary Microcarcinoma of the Thyroid

    Yasuhiro Ito;Chisato Tomoda;Takashi Uruno;Yuuki Takamura

  • INTERNAL FISTULA AS A ROUTE OF INFECTION IN ACUTE SUPPURATIVE THYROIDITIS

    Shin-Ichiro Takai;Fumio Matsuzuka;Goro Kosaki;Akira Miyauchi

  • Usefulness of thyroglobulin measurement in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer

    Takashi Uruno;Akira Miyauchi;Kazuo Shimizu;Chisato Tomoda

  • Identification of susceptibility loci for autoimmune thyroid disease to 5q31–q33 and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis to 8q23–q24 by multipoint affected sib-pair linkage analysis in Japanese

    Kenji Sakai;Senji Shirasawa;Naofumi Ishikawa;Kunihiko Ito

  • Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis of thyroid papillary carcinoma located in one lobe.

    Yasuhiro Ito;Tomoo Jikuzono;Takuya Higashiyama;Shuji Asahi

  • Intrathyroidal epithelial thymoma : An entity distinct from squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid

    Akira Miyauchi;Kanji Kuma;Fumio Matsuzuka;Sunao Matsubayashi

  • A New in Vitro Assay for Human Thyroid Stimulator Using Cultured Thyroid Cells: Effect of Sodium Chloride on Adenosine 3′,5′-Monophosphate Increase*

    Kanji Kasagi;Junji Konishi;Yasuhiro Iida;Katsuji Ikekubo

  • The correlation between papillary thyroid carcinoma and lymphocytic infiltration in the thyroid gland

    S. Matsubayashi;K. Kawai;Y. Matsumoto;T. Mukuta

  • The association of periodic paralysis and hyperthyroidism in Japan.

    S Okinaka;K Shizume;S Iino;A Watanabe

  • Accurate and Simple Method of Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules by the Modified Technique of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy

    Tamotsu Yokozawa;Akira Miyauchi;Kanji Kuma;Masahiro Sugawara

  • Ultrasonographically and anatomopathologically detectable node metastases in the lateral compartment as indicators of worse relapse-free survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma

    Yasuhiro Ito;Chisato Tomoda;Takashi Uruno;Yuuki Takamura

  • Two germline missense mutations at codons 804 and 806 of the RET proto-oncogene in the same allele in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B without codon 918 mutation

    Akira Miyauchi;Hitoyasu Futami;Noritaka Hai;Noritaka Hai;Tamotsu Yokozawa

  • Chronic thyroiditis as a risk factor of B-cell lymphoma in the thyroid gland.

    Ikuko Kato;Kazuo Tajima;Taizan Suchi;Katsuyuki Aozasa

  • Thyroid cancer detected by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

    Tamotsu Yokozawa;Shuji Fukata;Kanji Kuma;Fumio Matsuzuka

Frequent Co-Authors

Akira Miyauchi
Akira Miyauchi Tokai University
Nobuyuki Amino
Nobuyuki Amino Center for Excellence in Education
Junji Konishi
Junji Konishi Kyoto University
Takehiko Sasazuki
Takehiko Sasazuki Kyushu University
Keigo Endo
Keigo Endo Gunma University
Katsuyuki Aozasa
Katsuyuki Aozasa Osaka University
Toshio Tanaka
Toshio Tanaka Mie University
Kazuo Shizume
Kazuo Shizume University of Tokyo
Eiji Miyoshi
Eiji Miyoshi Osaka University
Hiroo Imura
Hiroo Imura Kyoto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways are also available. These programs offer flexible options for those who need to balance work or family commitments while advancing their education.

For example, a medical coding certification can quickly prepare you for in-demand roles in healthcare administration and support. Those interested in advanced patient care may explore affordable online fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner.

If nursing is your passion, there are cheapest online accelerated bsn programs designed for students who wish to fast-track their nursing career. For nurses aiming for leadership or research roles, online phd nursing programs offer advanced training and the potential for impactful careers in academia or healthcare policy.

Exploring these online pathways allows for cost-effective, flexible learning and can open doors to a variety of essential healthcare professions.

Best Scientists Citing Kanji Kuma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles