World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 43 1730 1604 46 43 210 6997

Julien Réthoré publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julien Réthoré between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julien Réthoré published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2017. 12 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2017. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julien Réthoré: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 4
2005 8
2006 9
2007 14
2008 16
2009 11
2010 19
2011 15
2012 7
2013 16
2014 7
2015 14
2016 9
2017 21
2018 10
2019 9
2020 7
2021 8
2022 7
2023 13
2024 8
2025 4
Total 237
Download as CSV

Julien Réthoré publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julien Réthoré sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 210 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125 210
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Julien Réthoré D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julien Réthoré sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101 43
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Julien Réthoré is affiliated with École Centrale de Nantes in France and has a notable research presence in the field of engineering, with a focus on mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, and civil and structural engineering. Their work extensively covers fatigue and fracture mechanics, optical measurement and interference techniques, as well as numerical methods in engineering.

The scientist's research spans several subfields including:

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Materials Chemistry

Key research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Optical measurement and interference techniques
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Composite Material Mechanics

Their recent published papers highlight diverse applications and methodologies such as:

  • "An open-source Abaqus implementation of the phase-field method to study the effect of plasticity on the instantaneous fracture toughness in dynamic crack propagation," 2020, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • "DIC Challenge 2.0: Developing Images and Guidelines for Evaluating Accuracy and Resolution of 2D Analyses," 2022, Experimental Mechanics
  • "Polydopamine coated Si nanoparticles allow for improved mechanical and electrochemical stability," 2021, Electrochimica Acta
  • "Unified phase field model to simulate both intergranular and transgranular failure in polycrystalline aggregates," 2021, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
  • "Capturing the stress evolution in electrode materials that undergo phase transformations during electrochemical cycling," 2021, International Journal of Solids and Structures

Julien Réthoré frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Rian Seghir
  • Benoît Blaysat
  • Julien Berthe
  • Richard N. Langlois
  • Michel Coret

Their work is published regularly in scientific venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Strain
  • Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • International Journal of Fracture

Best Publications

  • An energy‐conserving scheme for dynamic crack growth using the eXtended finite element method

    Julien Réthoré;Anthony Gravouil;Alain Combescure

  • Digital image correlation and fracture: an advanced technique for estimating stress intensity factors of 2D and 3D cracks

    Stéphane Roux;Julien Réthoré;François Hild

  • Extended digital image correlation with crack shape optimization

    Julien Réthoré;François Hild;Stéphane Roux

  • Efficient explicit time stepping for the eXtended Finite Element Method (X-FEM)

    Thomas Menouillard;Thomas Menouillard;Julien Réthoré;Alain Combescure;Harridh Bung

  • A two-scale approach for fluid flow in fractured porous media

    Julien Réthoré;René de Borst;René de Borst;Marie-Angèle Abellan

  • Multi-phase-field modeling of anisotropic crack propagation for polycrystalline materials

    Thanh Tung Nguyen;Julien Réthoré;Julien Réthoré;Julien Yvonnet;Marie-Christine Baietto

  • Three dimensional experimental and numerical multiscale analysis of a fatigue crack

    Johann Rannou;Nathalie Limodin;Julien Réthoré;Anthony Gravouil

  • Estimation of mixed-mode stress intensity factors using digital image correlation and an interaction integral

    Julien Réthoré;Anthony Gravouil;Fabrice Morestin;Alain Combescure

  • A two-scale model for fluid flow in an unsaturated porous medium with cohesive cracks

    Julien Réthoré;René de Borst;Marie-Angèle Abellan

  • Dynamic crack propagation under mixed-mode loading – Comparison between experiments and X-FEM simulations

    David Grégoire;Hubert Maigre;Julien Rethore;Alain Combescure

  • Shear-band capturing using a multiscale extended digital image correlation technique

    Julien Réthoré;François Hild;Stéphane Roux

  • An extended and integrated digital image correlation technique applied to the analysis of fractured samples The equilibrium gap method as a mechanical filter

    Julien Réthoré;Stéphane Roux;François Hild

  • Data-based derivation of material response

    Adrien Leygue;Michel Coret;Julien Réthoré;Laurent Stainier

  • Phase field modelling of anisotropic crack propagation

    Thanh Tung Nguyen;Julien Réthoré;Marie-Christine Baietto

  • A fully integrated noise robust strategy for the identification of constitutive laws from digital images

    Julien Réthoré;Julien Réthoré

  • A Numerical Approach for Arbitrary Cracks in a Fluid-Saturated Medium

    René de Borst;Julien Réthoré;Marie-Angèle Abellan

  • Crack closure and stress intensity factor measurements in nodular graphite cast iron using three-dimensional correlation of laboratory X-ray microtomography images

    Nathalie Limodin;Julien Réthoré;Jean-Yves Buffière;Anthony Gravouil

  • Mass lumping strategies for x-fem explicit dynamics: application to crack propagation

    Thomas Menouillard;Julien Réthoré;Nicolas Moes;Alain Combescure

  • Concentration-Gradient Prussian Blue Cathodes for Na-Ion Batteries

    Pu Hu;Wenbo Peng;Bo Wang;Dongdong Xiao

  • An open-source Abaqus implementation of the phase-field method to study the effect of plasticity on the instantaneous fracture toughness in dynamic crack propagation

    Gergely Molnár;Anthony Gravouil;Rian Seghir;Julien Réthoré

  • Extended three-dimensional digital image correlation (X3D-DIC)

    Julien Réthoré;Jean-Philippe Tinnes;Stéphane Roux;Jean-Yves Buffière

  • Analysis and Artifact Correction for Volume Correlation Measurements Using Tomographic Images from a Laboratory X-ray Source

    Nathalie Limodin;Julien Réthoré;Jérôme Adrien;Jean-Yves Buffiere

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony Gravouil
Anthony Gravouil Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
François Hild
François Hild École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Alain Combescure
Alain Combescure Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Stéphane Roux
Stéphane Roux École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Jean-Yves Buffiere
Jean-Yves Buffiere Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Jérôme Chevalier
Jérôme Chevalier Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Antonius Lubrecht
Antonius Lubrecht Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Eric Maire
Eric Maire Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Julien Yvonnet
Julien Yvonnet Gustave Eiffel University
David J. Dunstan
David J. Dunstan Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, understanding related fields and educational pathways can be invaluable. Programs like the accelerated ABA program offer a fast track to gaining specialized knowledge in applied behavior analysis, which is increasingly relevant in tech-driven industries.

Those exploring healthcare-related engineering fields might consider speech pathology as a complementary career path. However, it's important to know how hard it is to get into speech pathology grad school, as admission requirements and acceptance rates vary significantly.

For applicants concerned about entry barriers, research on the easiest SLP programs to get into can provide strategic insight, helping prospective students find programs that align with their qualifications and goals.

Cost is another critical factor in choosing a program. Prospective students should carefully assess online speech pathology degree programs cost to balance their educational investment with potential career outcomes, especially when considering online options that offer flexibility alongside financial commitment.

Best Scientists Citing Julien Réthoré

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles