World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 109 5662 5316 177 164 1138 67327

Giuseppe Boriani publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Giuseppe Boriani between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Giuseppe Boriani published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 34.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 106 publications in 2022. 170 of the 1,360 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 106. Peak 106 publications in 2022. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 41 publications 2004: 35 publications 2005: 38 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 36 publications 2008: 50 publications 2009: 35 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 40 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 48 publications 2017: 67 publications 2018: 80 publications 2019: 57 publications 2020: 65 publications 2021: 102 publications 2022: 106 publications 2023: 84 publications 2024: 68 publications 2025: 102 publications
1987 2025

1,360 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Giuseppe Boriani: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 3
1989 6
1990 7
1991 4
1992 6
1993 9
1994 2
1995 6
1996 10
1997 6
1998 13
1999 6
2000 8
2001 21
2002 15
2003 41
2004 35
2005 38
2006 31
2007 36
2008 50
2009 35
2010 29
2011 35
2012 31
2013 40
2014 24
2015 33
2016 48
2017 67
2018 80
2019 57
2020 65
2021 102
2022 106
2023 84
2024 68
2025 102
Total 1,360
Download as CSV

Giuseppe Boriani publications per year - data summary

  • Giuseppe Boriani, a Medicine scholar from University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, has 1,360 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1987 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 106 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1987, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 34.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 34.9 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 462 publications, 34% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1987-1999: 79 publications (6.1 per year); 2000-2012: 405 publications (31.2 per year); 2013-2025: 876 publications (67.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Giuseppe Boriani publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuseppe Boriani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,121–1,140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,138 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49 1,138
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Giuseppe Boriani publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Giuseppe Boriani, a Medicine scholar from University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, records 1,138 publications - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Giuseppe Boriani, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Giuseppe Boriani ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Giuseppe Boriani D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuseppe Boriani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 109
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Giuseppe Boriani D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Giuseppe Boriani, a Medicine scholar from University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, records 109 D-Index - the 72nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 72% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Giuseppe Boriani, and about 28% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Giuseppe Boriani ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Giuseppe Boriani is affiliated with the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specialization in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their work covers several subfields and topics including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Epidemiology

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Giuseppe Boriani has contributed to multiple recent research papers, including:

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), 2020, European Heart Journal
  • 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS), 2022, European Heart Journal
  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • 2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, 2021, EP Europace
  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy, 2021, EP Europace

The frequent publication venues for Giuseppe Boriani include:

  • EP Europace
  • European Heart Journal
  • European Journal of Internal Medicine
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
  • PubMed

Collaborations are a significant aspect of their work. Some of the frequent co-authors are:

  • Marco Vitolo
  • Jacopo Francesco Imberti
  • Gregory Y.H. Lip
  • Marco Proietti
  • Tatjana Potpara

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy : The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michele Brignole;Angelo Auricchio;Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias;Pierre Bordachar

  • The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

    Steffel J;Verhamme P;Potpara Ts;Albaladejo P

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapyDeveloped by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michael Glikson;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Mads Brix Kronborg;Yoav Michowitz

  • Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillators for the Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Barry J. Maron;Win Kuang Shen;Mark S. Link;Andrew E. Epstein

  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and prevention of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Barry J. Maron;Paolo Spirito;Win Kuang Shen;Tammy S. Haas

  • Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

    Gregory Y.H. Lip;Amitava Banerjee;Giuseppe Boriani;Chern en Chiang

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Michael Glikson;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Mads Brix Kronborg;Yoav Michowitz

  • Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration

    Ben Freedman;John Camm;Hugh Calkins;Jeffrey S Healey

  • Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

    Piotr Ponikowski;Bridget-Anne Kirwan;Bridget-Anne Kirwan;Stefan D Anker;Theresa McDonagh;Theresa McDonagh

  • Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)

    Gregory Y H Lip;Stephan Windecker;Kurt Huber;Paulus Kirchhof

  • Device-detected atrial fibrillation and risk for stroke: an analysis of >10 000 patients from the SOS AF project (Stroke preventiOn Strategies based on Atrial Fibrillation information from implanted devices)

    Giuseppe Boriani;Taya V. Glotzer;Massimo Santini;Teena M. West

  • Presence and duration of atrial fibrillation detected by continuous monitoring: crucial implications for the risk of thromboembolic events.

    Giovanni L. Botto;Luigi Padeletti;Massimo Santini;Alessandro Capucci

  • Monitored atrial fibrillation duration predicts arterial embolic events in patients suffering from bradycardia and atrial fibrillation implanted with antitachycardia pacemakers.

    Alessandro Capucci;Massimo Santini;Luigi Padeletti;Michele Gulizia

  • Left Superior Vena Cava Persistence in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker or Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A 10-Year Experience

    Mauro Biffi;Giuseppe Boriani;Lorenzo Frabetti;Gabriele Bronzetti

  • 2018 EHRA expert consensus statement on lead extraction: recommendations on definitions, endpoints, research trial design, and data collection requirements for clinical scientific studies and registries: endorsed by APHRS/HRS/LAHRS.

    Maria G Bongiorni;Haran Burri;Jean C Deharo;Christoph Starck

  • Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: clinical correlates, management, and outcomes in the EORP-AF Pilot General Registry.

    Giuseppe Boriani;Cecile Laroche;Igor Diemberger;Elisa Fantecchi

  • Wide spectrum of presentation and variable outcomes of isolated left ventricular non-compaction

    C Lofiego;E Biagini;F Pasquale;M Ferlito

  • EACVI/EHRA Expert Consensus Document on the role of multi-modality imaging for the evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation

    Erwan Donal;Erwan Donal;Gregory Y. H. Lip;Gregory Y. H. Lip;Maurizio Galderisi;Andreas Goette

Frequent Co-Authors

Angelo Branzi
Angelo Branzi University of Bologna
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool
Massimo Santini
Massimo Santini University of Pisa
Claudio Rapezzi
Claudio Rapezzi University of Ferrara
Deirdre A. Lane
Deirdre A. Lane University of Liverpool
Aldo P. Maggioni
Aldo P. Maggioni Heart Care Foundation, ANMCO Research Center, Florence
Luigi Tavazzi
Luigi Tavazzi University of Ferrara
Paulus Kirchhof
Paulus Kirchhof University of Birmingham
Laurent Fauchier
Laurent Fauchier François Rabelais University
Harry J.G.M. Crijns
Harry J.G.M. Crijns Maastricht University Medical Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare, there are many flexible online degree options that support different career goals. If you’re drawn to leadership roles in hospitals or health systems, consider exploring cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs. These programs are recognized for maintaining high standards and can help open doors to management and executive positions.

Registered nurses wanting to advance their credentials may benefit from online rn-bsn programs without clinicals. These options allow working professionals to boost their qualifications entirely online, making it easier to balance work, study, and personal obligations.

For advanced nursing practice, doctoral degrees are increasingly accessible. Those looking to accelerate their progress may be interested in the quickest dnp program. Meanwhile, cost-conscious learners can investigate the cheapest dnp program for options that fit their budget without sacrificing educational quality.

These online pathways make it easier for students and professionals to upskill, specialize, or transition into new roles within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Giuseppe Boriani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles