World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
12994
World Ranking
6065
National Ranking
44

Elske Ammenwerth publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elske Ammenwerth sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 286 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Elske Ammenwerth D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elske Ammenwerth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elske Ammenwerth is affiliated with UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology in Austria. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with a focus on Health Information Management, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Computer Science Applications, and Education.

Their scientific contributions address key topics in electronic health and medical informatics, including Electronic Health Records Systems, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Online Learning and Analytics, Data Quality and Management, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, and Clinical Practice Guidelines Implementation.

Elske Ammenwerth's publication record includes multiple recent papers such as:

  • "Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics: Second Revision," 2022, published in International Journal of Medical Informatics
  • "Adult patient access to electronic health records," 2021, in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • "Applying and Extending the FITT Framework to Identify the Challenges and Opportunities of Successful eHealth Services for Patient Self-Management: Qualitative Interview Study," 2020, in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "International Comparison of Six Basic eHealth Indicators Across 14 Countries: An eHealth Benchmarking Study," 2020, in Methods of Information in Medicine
  • "Suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model for Predicting mHealth Acceptance Using Diabetes as an Example: Qualitative Methods Triangulation Study," 2022, in JMIR Human Factors

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ammenwerth include:

  • Franziska Jahn (13 co-authored works)
  • Alfred Winter (12 co-authored works)
  • Werner O. Hackl (11 co-authored works)
  • Michael Marschollek (8 co-authored works)
  • Verena Dornauer (8 co-authored works)

The scientist has contributed extensively to recognized publication venues such as Studies in Health Technology and Informatics with 21 publications, Yearbook of Medical Informatics (5), Journal of Medical Internet Research (4), Methods of Information in Medicine (2), and JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies (2).

Among book contributions, Ammenwerth authored in the Health Informatics domain with the publication titled "Health Information Systems" in 2023, which has also been cited in academic research.

Best Publications

  • The Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review

    Elske Ammenwerth;Petra Schnell-Inderst;Christof Machan;Uwe Siebert

  • Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics - First Revision

    J. Mantas;E. Ammenwerth;G. Demiris;A. Hasman

  • IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study

    Elske Ammenwerth;Carola Iller;Cornelia Mahler

  • Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges.

    Elske Ammenwerth;Stefan Gräber;Gabriele Herrmann;Thomas Bürkle

  • Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics

    John Mantas;Elske Ammenwerth;George Demiris;Arie Hasman

  • The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials.

    Elske Ammenwerth;Petra Schnell-Inderst;Alexander Hoerbst

  • Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck

    Elske Ammenwerth;Jytte Brender;Pirkko Nykänen;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch

  • Electronic health records. A systematic review on quality requirements.

    A. Hoerbst;E. Ammenwerth

  • Factors Affecting and Affected by User Acceptance of Computer-based Nursing Documentation: Results of a Two-year Study

    Elske Ammenwerth;Ulrich Mansmann;Carola Iller;Ronald Eichstädter

  • Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013.

    Reinhold Haux;Elske Ammenwerth;Werner Herzog;Petra Knaup

  • Mobile information and communication tools in the hospital.

    Elske Ammenwerth;Anke Buchauer;Bernd Bludau;Reinhold Haux

  • Strategic Information Management in Hospitals: An Introduction to Hospital Information Systems

    Reinhold Haux;Reed M. Gardner;Birgit Brigl;Elske Ammenwerth

  • Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Challenges for Evaluating AI and Practical Implications

    Farah Magrabi;Elske Ammenwerth;Jytte Brender McNair;Nicolet F. De Keizer

  • STARE-HI—Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics

    Jan L. Talmon;Elske Ammenwerth;Jytte Brender;Nicolette de Keizer

  • Technology Acceptance Models in Health Informatics: TAM and UTAUT.

    Elske Ammenwerth

  • The time needed for clinical documentation versus direct patient care. A work-sampling analysis of physicians' activities.

    Elske Ammenwerth;Hans-Peter Spötl

  • A Randomized Evaluation of a Computer-Based Nursing Documentation System

    E. Ammenwerth;R. Eichstädter;R. Haux;U. Pohl

  • Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study.

    Elske Ammenwerth;Carola Iller;Ulrich Mansmann

  • An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.

    E. Ammenwerth;N. de Keizer

  • Effect of a nursing information system on the quality of information processing in nursing: An evaluation study using the HIS-monitor instrument.

    Elske Ammenwerth;Franz Rauchegger;Frauke Ehlers;Bernhard Hirsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Farah Magrabi
Farah Magrabi Macquarie University
Andrew Georgiou
Andrew Georgiou Macquarie University
Michael Felderer
Michael Felderer University of Cologne
Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
Hans-Ulrich Prokosch University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Arie Hasman
Arie Hasman University of Amsterdam
Franz Resch
Franz Resch Heidelberg University
Walter E. Haefeli
Walter E. Haefeli Heidelberg University
Uwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
Christian Lovis
Christian Lovis University of Geneva
William R. Hersh
William R. Hersh Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in computer science, there are many flexible online options to help you reach your goals. For those who may be concerned about past academic performance, some top online colleges that accept low gpa can provide accessible pathways to begin your studies, letting you build a strong foundation and progress at your own pace.

Many students seek practical and affordable alternatives to traditional on-campus programs. A popular route is earning a 2-year computer science degree online, which allows for an accelerated learning experience and faster entry into the workforce.

Computer science is also highly relevant to environmental fields. Graduates interested in sustainable solutions may explore environmental engineering degree online programs, which combine technical skills with environmental impact. For those curious about broader roles, learn more about jobs for environmental science majors and see how your computer science background may unlock cross-disciplinary opportunities.

Whether you’re seeking flexibility, affordability, or a unique career path, these online programs offer diverse options to match your aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Elske Ammenwerth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles