World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 34 12127 11775 228 218 263 5264

Arie Hasman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arie Hasman between 1950 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arie Hasman published across 75 years, from 1950 to 2024, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2006. 1 of the 327 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2006. 1950: 1 publication 1951: 0 publications 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 5 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 9 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1950 2024

327 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arie Hasman: publications per year, 1950 to 2024
Year Publications
1950 1
1951 0
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 2
1977 0
1978 5
1979 3
1980 0
1981 2
1982 1
1983 2
1984 5
1985 1
1986 5
1987 7
1988 1
1989 1
1990 9
1991 8
1992 2
1993 6
1994 9
1995 17
1996 16
1997 16
1998 13
1999 14
2000 16
2001 16
2002 14
2003 17
2004 10
2005 10
2006 18
2007 9
2008 4
2009 8
2010 7
2011 14
2012 4
2013 5
2014 8
2015 3
2016 0
2017 4
2018 4
2019 3
2020 2
2021 0
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 327
Download as CSV

Arie Hasman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie Hasman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 262–271 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 263 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301 263
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Arie Hasman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie Hasman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 34
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Arie Hasman is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on health professions and medicine, with a specialization in health information management. Additional subfields of study include general health professions, health informatics, biomedical engineering, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics of Arie Hasman's research revolve around electronic health records systems, mobile health and mHealth applications, and artificial intelligence in healthcare and education. Other topics include biomedical and engineering education, telemedicine and telehealth implementation, ECG monitoring and analysis, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Recent papers by Arie Hasman and frequent collaborators include:

  • "Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics: Second Revision" (2022), published in the International Journal of Medical Informatics
  • "Nurses' experiences and viewpoints about the benefits of adopting information technology in health care: a qualitative study in Iran" (2020), published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
  • "My Journey Through the Field of Medical Informatics" (2022), published in Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
  • "Digital health and health informatics" (2024), published in the International Journal of Medical Informatics
  • "Nurses' experiences and viewpoints about the benefits of adopting information technology in health care: A qualitative study" (2020), published in Research Square (Research Square)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Arie Hasman include John Mantas, Heimar F. Marin, Jamileh Farokhzadian, Reza Khajouei, and Leila Ahmadian.

Arie Hasman's work is commonly published in the International Journal of Medical Informatics, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, and Research Square. These venues reflect the focus on biomedical and health informatics within their research portfolio.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics - First Revision

    J. Mantas;E. Ammenwerth;G. Demiris;A. Hasman

  • Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review.

    M. J. van der Meijden;Huibert J. Tange;J. Troost;Arie Hasman

  • Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics

    John Mantas;Elske Ammenwerth;George Demiris;Arie Hasman

  • METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW: Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support

    Paul A de Clercq;Johannes A Blom;Hendrikus H. M Korsten;Arie Hasman

  • Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics - First Revision -

    John Mantas;Elske Ammenwerth;George Demiris;Arie Hasman

  • Inter-organizational future proof EHR systems A review of the security and privacy related issues

    Helma van der Linden;Dipak Kalra;Arie Hasman;Jan L. Talmon

  • Medical narratives in electronic medical records

    Huibert J Tange;Arie Hasman;Pieter F de Vries Robbé;Harry C Schouten

  • Results from simulated data sets: probabilistic record linkage outperforms deterministic record linkage

    Miranda Tromp;Anita C. Ravelli;Gouke J. Bonsel;Gouke J. Bonsel;Arie Hasman

  • Enterprise resource planning for hospitals.

    Godefridus G van Merode;Siebren Groothuis;Arie Hasman

  • Design and implementation of a framework to support the development of clinical guidelines.

    Paul A. de Clercq;Paul A. de Clercq;Arie Hasman;Arie Hasman;Johannes A. Blom;Johannes A. Blom;Hendrikus H.M. Korsten

  • From clinical practice guidelines to computer-interpretable guidelines. A literature overview.

    A. Latoszek-Berendsen;H. Tange;H. J. van den Herik;A. Hasman

  • The Granularity of Medical Narratives and Its Effect on the Speed and Completeness of Information Retrieval

    Huibert J. Tange;Harry C. Schouten;Arnold D. M. Kester;Arie Hasman

  • Clinicians satisfaction with CPOE ease of use and effect on clinicians' workflow, efficiency and medication safety.

    Reza Khajouei;Reza Khajouei;P. C. Wierenga;Arie Hasman;Monique W. M. Jaspers

  • Computer-Interpretable Guideline formalisms.

    Paul A. de Clercq;Katharina Kaiser;Arie Hasman

  • The effect of computerized decision support on barriers to guideline implementation: A qualitative study in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation

    Rick Goud;Mariette van Engen-Verheul;Nicolette F. de Keizer;Roland Bal

  • Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation

    Rick Goud;Nicolette F de Keizer;Gerben ter Riet;Jeremy C Wyatt

  • A Comparison of Nursing Minimal Data Sets

    William T. F. Goossen;Paul J. M. M. Epping;Ton Feuth;Theo W. N. Dassen

  • Development and implementation of an EPR: how to encourage the user.

    M. J. van der Meijden;Huibert J. Tange;J. Troost;Arie Hasman

  • A systematic view on medical informatics

    A Hasman;R Haux;Adelin Albert

  • MR renography by semiautomated image analysis: Performance in renal transplant recipients

    de Ja Priester;Agh Alphons Kessels;Elw Eelco Giele;den Ja Boer

  • Assessing the importance of features for multi-layer perceptrons

    Michael Egmont-Petersen;Jan L. Talmon;Arie Hasman;Anton W. Ambergen

  • Simulation as decision tool for capacity planning.

    Siebren Groothuis;Godefridus;G van Merode;Arie Hasman

  • Determination of the effectiveness of two methods for usability evaluation using a CPOE medication ordering system.

    Reza Khajouei;Arie Hasman;Monique W. M. Jaspers

  • A parallel guideline development and formalization strategy to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines

    Rick Goud;Arie Hasman;Anne-Margreet Strijbis;Niels Peek

  • An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling.

    Arie Hasman

Frequent Co-Authors

Arno M. M. Muijtjens
Arno M. M. Muijtjens Maastricht University
Elske Ammenwerth
Elske Ammenwerth UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
Robert S. Reneman
Robert S. Reneman Maastricht University
Ruud J.G. Halfens
Ruud J.G. Halfens Maastricht University
Christian Lovis
Christian Lovis University of Geneva
Edward H. Shortliffe
Edward H. Shortliffe Columbia University
William R. Hersh
William R. Hersh Oregon Health & Science University
Randolph A. Miller
Randolph A. Miller Vanderbilt University
Harry C. Schouten
Harry C. Schouten Maastricht University
Vimla L. Patel
Vimla L. Patel Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of flexible online study options. For those aiming for a fast academic advancement, the shortest online masters degree programs allow you to earn advanced credentials quickly, often in under two years. This is a popular route for professionals looking to upskill without putting their careers on hold.

Deciding what masters program should I do depends on your specific goals and current market demand. Fields like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and software engineering are especially valuable today for career growth.

If you're just starting, 2 year online degrees offer an affordable and flexible entry point into computer science. These programs can lead directly to entry-level tech jobs or serve as a stepping stone to bachelor’s or master’s degrees.

Cost is a crucial factor. Numerous affordable online colleges provide high-quality computer science programs without breaking the bank, making it easier to balance education and finances.

Best Scientists Citing Arie Hasman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles