World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 36 4982 4669 184 179 115 3763

Walter Chitarra publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Walter Chitarra between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Walter Chitarra published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2020. 11 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2020. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 6 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
2009 2026

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Walter Chitarra: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 1
2011 1
2012 6
2013 12
2014 6
2015 3
2016 6
2017 7
2018 6
2019 10
2020 17
2021 12
2022 10
2023 9
2024 12
2025 10
2026 1
Total 131
Download as CSV

Walter Chitarra publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Chitarra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–115 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 115 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255 115
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Walter Chitarra D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Chitarra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246 36
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Insights On the Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis On Tomato Tolerance to Water Stress

    Walter Chitarra;Chiara Pagliarani;Biancaelena Maserti;Erica Lumini

  • Drought stress adaptation modulates plant secondary metabolite production in Salvia dolomitica Codd

    Matteo Caser;Walter Chitarra;Walter Chitarra;Francesca D'Angiolillo;Irene Perrone

  • Breeding toward improved ecological plant-microbiome interactions.

    Unknown

  • Fungal and plant gene expression in the Tulasnella calospora-Serapias vomeracea symbiosis provides clues about nitrogen pathways in orchid mycorrhizas.

    Valeria Fochi;Walter Chitarra;Annegret Kohler;Samuele Voyron

  • Recovery from water stress affects grape leaf petiole transcriptome

    Irene Perrone;Chiara Pagliarani;Claudio Lovisolo;Claudio Lovisolo;Walter Chitarra

  • The Grapevine Root-Specific Aquaporin VvPIP2;4N Controls Root Hydraulic Conductance and Leaf Gas Exchange under Well-Watered Conditions But Not under Water Stress

    Irene Perrone;Giorgio Gambino;Walter Chitarra;Marco Vitali

  • The Association With Two Different Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Differently Affects Water Stress Tolerance in Tomato.

    Veronica Volpe;Walter Chitarra;Pasquale Cascone;Maria Grazia Volpe

  • Isolation, molecular characterization and virome analysis of culturable wood fungal endophytes in esca symptomatic and asymptomatic grapevine plants.

    Luca Nerva;Massimo Turina;Alessandro Zanzotto;Massimo Gardiman

  • Double-Stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) as a Sustainable Tool against Gray Mold (Botrytis cinerea) in Grapevine: Effectiveness of Different Application Methods in an Open-Air Environment.

    Luca Nerva;Marco Sandrini;Marco Sandrini;Giorgio Gambino;Walter Chitarra;Walter Chitarra

  • Whole-genome sequencing and SNV genotyping of 'Nebbiolo' (Vitis vinifera L.) clones.

    Giorgio Gambino;Alessandra Dal Molin;Paolo Boccacci;Andrea Minio

  • Grapevine Grafting: Scion Transcript Profiling and Defense-Related Metabolites Induced by Rootstocks

    Walter Chitarra;Irene Perrone;Carla G. Avanzato;Andrea Minio

  • Abiotic Stress and Belowground Microbiome: The Potential of Omics Approaches

    Unknown

  • Ecophysiological and phytochemical responses of Salvia sinaloensis Fern. to drought stress

    Matteo Caser;Francesca D’Angiolillo;Walter Chitarra;Walter Chitarra;Walter Chitarra;Claudio Lovisolo

  • Improvement of plant performance under water deficit with the employment of biological and chemical priming agents

    R. Balestrini;W. Chitarra;C. Antoniou;M. Ruocco

  • Photosynthetic Traits and Nitrogen Uptake in Crops: Which Is the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?

    Raffaella Balestrini;Cecilia Brunetti;Walter Chitarra;Walter Chitarra;Luca Nerva;Luca Nerva

  • The mycovirome of a fungal collection from the sea cucumber Holothuria polii.

    L. Nerva;M. Forgia;M. Ciuffo;W. Chitarra

  • Novel functional microRNAs from virus-free and infected Vitis vinifera plants under water stress

    Vitantonio Pantaleo;Marco Vitali;Paolo Boccacci;Laura Miozzi

  • Transgene silencing in grapevines transformed with GFLV resistance genes: analysis of variable expression of transgene, siRNAs production and cytosine methylation

    Giorgio Gambino;Irene Perrone;Andrea Carra;Walter Chitarra

  • Biological and Molecular Characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Mitovirus 1 Reveals a Distinct Small RNA Response Compared to Those of Cytoplasmic RNA Viruses.

    L. Nerva;G. Vigani;D. Di Silvestre;M. Ciuffo

  • Novel and emerging biotechnological crop protection approaches

    Gaetano Giudice;Gaetano Giudice;Loredana Moffa;Loredana Moffa;Serena Varotto;Maria Francesca Cardone

  • Gene expression in vessel-associated cells upon xylem embolism repair in Vitis vinifera L. petioles

    Walter Chitarra;Raffaella Balestrini;Marco Vitali;Chiara Pagliarani

  • Effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 and temperature on disease severity of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lactucae on lettuce plants

    Ilario Ferrocino;Walter Chitarra;Massimo Pugliese;Giovanna Gilardi

  • Potential uptake of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes from growth substrate into leaves of salad plants and basil grown in soil irrigated with contaminated water

    Walter Chitarra;Lucia Decastelli;Angelo Garibaldi;Maria Lodovica Gullino

  • Water deficit regimes trigger changes in valuable physiological and phytochemical parameters in Helichrysum petiolare Hilliard & B.L. Burtt

    Matteo Caser;Francesca D'Angiolillo;Walter Chitarra;Walter Chitarra;Claudio Lovisolo

  • Effects of Different Microbial Inocula on Tomato Tolerance to Water Deficit

    Giuseppe Mannino;Luca Nerva;Takoua Gritli;Mara Novero

  • Effect of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 and Temperature on the Disease Severity of Rocket Plants Caused by Fusarium Wilt under Phytotron Conditions.

    Walter Chitarra;Ilenia Siciliano;Ilario Ferrocino;Maria Lodovica Gullino

  • Ozone Improves the Aromatic Fingerprint of White Grapes

    Susana Río Segade;Mar Vilanova;Simone Giacosa;Irene Perrone

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Lovisolo
Claudio Lovisolo University of Turin
Maria Lodovica Gullino
Maria Lodovica Gullino University of Turin
Raffaella Balestrini
Raffaella Balestrini National Research Council (CNR)
Angelo Garibaldi
Angelo Garibaldi University of Turin
Andrea Schubert
Andrea Schubert University of Turin
Massimo Turina
Massimo Turina National Research Council (CNR)
Luca Giorgio Carlo Rolle
Luca Giorgio Carlo Rolle University of Turin
Davide Spadaro
Davide Spadaro University of Turin
Luisa Pistelli
Luisa Pistelli University of Pisa
Massimo Delledonne
Massimo Delledonne University of Verona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Walter Chitarra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles