World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6069
World Ranking
12047
National Ranking
597

Hans-Ulrich Prokosch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Ulrich Prokosch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 237 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hans-Ulrich Prokosch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Ulrich Prokosch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans-Ulrich Prokosch is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a notable emphasis on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Health Information Management, General Health Professions, and Nephrology.

The main topics explored in their work include Electronic Health Records Systems, Ethics in Clinical Research, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, and Genomics and Rare Diseases.

Publications by Hans-Ulrich Prokosch have appeared frequently in several scientific venues, including:

  • Studies in health technology and informatics
  • JMIR Medical Informatics
  • Applied Clinical Informatics
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Scientific Reports

Their recent papers encompass a range of topics and were published in notable journals. These include:

  • Reduced Rate of Inpatient Hospital Admissions in 18 German University Hospitals During the COVID-19 Lockdown, 2021, Frontiers in Public Health
  • refineR: A Novel Algorithm for Reference Interval Estimation from Real-World Data, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Frequent LPA KIV-2 Variants Lower Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations and Protect Against Coronary Artery Disease, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Reference Interval Estimation from Mixed Distributions using Truncation Points and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Distance (kosmic), 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Development and Evaluation of a Web-Based Paediatric Drug Information System for Germany, 2021, Pharmacy

Collaborative work is an essential component of their research, with frequent coauthors including Matthias Schmid, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Ulla T. Schultheiß, Fruzsina Kotsis, and Martin Boeker.

Best Publications

  • eHealth trends in Europe 2005-2007: a population-based survey.

    Per Egil Kummervold;Catherine E Chronaki;Berthold Lausen;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch

  • Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck

    Elske Ammenwerth;Jytte Brender;Pirkko Nykänen;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch

  • Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research.

    Hans-Ulrich Prokosch;T. Ganslandt

  • A scoping review of cloud computing in healthcare

    Lena Griebel;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch;Felix Köpcke;Dennis Toddenroth

  • Relations between Internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support and subjective health.

    Silje C Wangberg;Hege K Andreassen;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch;Silvina Maria Vagos Santana

  • Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey

    Silvina Santana;Berthold Lausen;Maria Bujnowska-Fedak;Catherine E Chronaki

  • International electronic health record-derived COVID-19 clinical course profiles: the 4CE consortium

    Gabriel A. Brat;Griffin M. Weber;Nils Gehlenborg;Paul Avillach

  • MIRACUM: Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine

    Hans-Ulrich Prokosch;Till Acker;Johannes Bernarding;Harald Binder

  • Empowerment of patients and communication with health care professionals through an electronic health record.

    Frank Ueckert;Michael Goerz;Maximilian Ataian;Sven Tessmann

  • Strategic information management plans: the basis for systematic information management in hospitals

    A.F Winter;E Ammenwerth;O.J Bott;B Brigl

  • Evaluation of data completeness in the electronic health record for the purpose of patient recruitment into clinical trials: a retrospective analysis of element presence

    Felix Köpcke;Benjamin Trinczek;Raphael W Majeed;Björn Schreiweis

  • refineR: A Novel Algorithm for Reference Interval Estimation from Real-World Data.

    Tatjana Ammer;Tatjana Ammer;André Schützenmeister;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch;Manfred Rauh

  • Evaluation of clinical information systems. What can be evaluated and what cannot

    Thomas Bürkle;Elske Ammenwerth;Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch;Joachim Dudeck

  • Employing Computers for the Recruitment into Clinical Trials: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

    Felix Köpcke;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch

  • Ontology-Based Data Integration between Clinical and Research Systems

    Sebastian Mate;Felix Köpcke;Dennis Toddenroth;Marcus Martin

  • Use and perception of internet for health related purposes in Germany: results of a national survey.

    Roxana Corina Dumitru;Thomas Bürkle;Sergej Potapov;Berthold Lausen

  • Routine data from hospital information systems can support patient recruitment for clinical studies

    Martin Dugas;Matthias Lange;Carsten Müller-Tidow;Paulus Kirchhof

  • Cross-institutional data exchange using the clinical document architecture (CDA).

    Marcel Lucas Müller;Frank Ückert;Thomas Bürkle;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch

  • Process mining for clinical workflows: challenges and current limitations.

    Martin Lang;Thomas Bürkle;Susanne Laumann;Hans-Ulrich Prokosch

  • Towards Implementation of OMOP in a German University Hospital Consortium.

    Christian Maier;L. Lang;Holger Storf;Patric Vormstein

  • Unlocking Data for Clinical Research - The German i2b2 Experience

    T. Ganslandt;S. Mate;K. Helbing;U. Sax

Frequent Co-Authors

Kai-Uwe Eckardt
Kai-Uwe Eckardt Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Matthias W. Beckmann
Matthias W. Beckmann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Martin Dugas
Martin Dugas Heidelberg University
Michael Stürzl
Michael Stürzl University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
André Reis
André Reis University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Wolfgang Rascher
Wolfgang Rascher University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Hermann Haller
Hermann Haller Hannover Medical School
Elske Ammenwerth
Elske Ammenwerth UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
Michael Hummel
Michael Hummel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Peter J. Oefner
Peter J. Oefner University of Regensburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in pursuing Computer Science or a similar field in the USA, several flexible online options can meet a range of academic backgrounds and budgets. Today, the cheapest online degrees can provide high-quality education without overwhelming debt, making them ideal for budget-conscious learners.

Many online graduate programs that accept 2.0 GPA are now available, helping students with lower undergraduate GPAs continue their education and advance their careers. These programs often offer flexibility and support for students needing a fresh start.

Thinking beyond Computer Science, interdisciplinary paths are growing in popularity. For example, there are numerous jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree backgrounds, reflecting the expanding reach of STEM in education and sustainability sectors.

For those seeking a fast track, consider the online computer science degree programs with accelerated formats. These allow you to quickly gain practical skills and enter the tech workforce sooner—perfect for career changers or those eager to get ahead.

Best Scientists Citing Hans-Ulrich Prokosch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles