World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
8406
World Ranking
5488
National Ranking
2993

John M. Roll publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Roll sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 193 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John M. Roll D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Roll sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Roll is affiliated with Washington State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions to epidemiology, public health, pediatrics, pharmacology, and general health professions.

The main topics explored in their work include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence

Frequent venues for publishing their research consist of:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Recent papers authored or coauthored by John M. Roll include:

  • Intraoperative Methadone Use in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review (2021) published in Pain Medicine
  • Effect of Incentives for Alcohol Abstinence in Partnership With 3 American Indian and Alaska Native Communities (2021) published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • Contingency Management for Stimulant Use Disorder (2023) published in Journal of Ambulatory Care Management
  • The rewarding recovery study: a randomized controlled trial of incentives for alcohol and drug abstinence with a rural American Indian community (2020) published in Addiction
  • Effectiveness of incorporating contingency management into a public treatment program for people who use crack cocaine in Brazil. A single-blind randomized controlled trial (2021) published in International Journal of Drug Policy

John M. Roll collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Sterling McPherson
  • Michael G. McDonell
  • André Miguel
  • Crystal Lederhos Smith
  • Jalene Herron

Best Publications

  • Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis.

    Michael Prendergast;Deborah Podus;John Finney;Lisa Greenwell

  • Effect of Prize-Based Incentives on Outcomes in Stimulant Abusers in Outpatient Psychosocial Treatment Programs: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network Study

    Nancy M. Petry;Jessica M. Peirce;Maxine L. Stitzer;Jack Blaine

  • Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study.

    Jessica M. Peirce;Nancy M. Petry;Maxine L. Stitzer;Jack Blaine

  • Cognitive function and nigrostriatal markers in abstinent methamphetamine abusers

    Chris Ellyn Johanson;Kirk A. Frey;Leslie H. Lundahl;Pamela Keenan

  • Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorders

    John M. Roll;Nancy M. Petry;Maxine L. Stitzer;Mary L. Brecht

  • An experimental comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar.

    John M. Roll;Stephen T. Higgins;Gary J. Badger

  • A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar.

    John M Roll;Stephen T Higgins

  • Disparities in unmet need for mental health services in the United States, 1997-2010.

    John M. Roll;Jae Kennedy;Melanie Tran;Donelle Howell

  • Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sertraline and contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence

    Steven Shoptaw;Alice Huber;James Peck;Xiaowei Yang

  • Randomized controlled trial of contingency management for stimulant use in community mental health patients with serious mental illness.

    Michael G. McDonell;Debra Srebnik;Frank Angelo;Sterling McPherson

  • Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of baclofen and gabapentin for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence

    Keith G. Heinzerling;Steven Shoptaw;James A. Peck;Xiaowei Yang

  • Contingency management interventions for treating the substance abuse of adolescents: a feasibility study.

    Elizabeth A. Corby;John M. Roll;David M. Ledgerwood;Charles R. Schuster

  • Use of monetary reinforcement to reduce the cigarette smoking of persons with schizophrenia: a feasibility study.

    John M. Roll;Stephen T. Higgins;Sandra Steingard;Mark McGinley

  • Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program.

    John M. Roll;Michael Prendergast;Kimberly Richardson;William Burdon

  • Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

    Frances K. McSweeney;John M. Roll

  • Comparison of patient self-reports and urinalysis results obtained under naturalistic methadone treatment conditions

    Stephen T Chermack;Stephen T Chermack;John Roll;John Roll;Mark Reilly;Mark Reilly;Leonard Davis

  • A comparison of cocaine-dependent cigarette smokers and non-smokers on demographic, drug use and other characteristics

    John M. Roll;Stephen T. Higgins;Alan J. Budney;Warren K. Bickel

  • Prize-based contingency management does not increase gambling

    Nancy M. Petry;Ken B. Kolodner;Rui Li;Jessica M. Peirce

  • Contingency management: an evidence-based component of methamphetamine use disorder treatments.

    John M. Roll

  • A review of contingency management for the treatment of substance-use disorders: adaptation for underserved populations, use of experimental technologies, and personalized optimization strategies.

    Sterling M McPherson;Ekaterina Burduli;Crystal Lederhos Smith;Jalene Herron

  • Contingency management in substance abuse treatment: A structured review of the evidence for its transportability

    Bryan Hartzler;Steve J. Lash;Steve J. Lash;John M. Roll

  • Association between hepatitis C virus and opioid use while in buprenorphine treatment: preliminary findings.

    Sean M. Murphy;Dana Dweik;Sterling McPherson;John M. Roll

  • Erratum: Cognitive function and nigrostriatal markers in abstinent methamphetamine abusers (Psychopharmacology (2006) 185 (327-338) DOI: http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0330-6)

    Chris Ellyn Johanson;Kirk A. Frey;Kirk A. Frey;Leslie H. Lundahl;Pamela Keenan

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard K. Ries
Richard K. Ries University of Washington
Debra Srebnik
Debra Srebnik University of Washington
Nancy M. Petry
Nancy M. Petry University of Connecticut
Maxine L. Stitzer
Maxine L. Stitzer Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Frances K. McSweeney
Frances K. McSweeney Washington State University
Stephen T. Higgins
Stephen T. Higgins University of Vermont
Kimberly C. Kirby
Kimberly C. Kirby Rowan University
Michael Prendergast
Michael Prendergast University of California, Los Angeles
Jack Blaine
Jack Blaine National Institute on Drug Abuse
Walter Ling
Walter Ling University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a range of rewarding career pathways in mental health and counseling. Each state has its own unique requirements for becoming a licensed therapist, and it’s vital to research the necessary steps where you plan to practice.

For instance, if you are interested in understanding how to become a licensed therapist in Baltimore, you’ll need to meet specific academic and supervised experience standards. Similarly, the Boise licensed therapist education requirements outline the courses and hands-on training required in Idaho.

In Boston, aspiring professionals should review the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Boston to make sure they follow Massachusetts state guidelines. If you’re looking at career options in upstate New York, the Buffalo licensed therapist education requirements offer a detailed roadmap.

Many online psychology degree programs are designed to align with state licensing criteria, making it easier for students to pursue credentials while balancing other commitments. Always verify that your chosen program meets licensure requirements in your intended state of practice.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Roll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles