World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
7572
World Ranking
6410
National Ranking
3092

Jack Blaine publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Blaine sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 81 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jack Blaine D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Blaine sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jack Blaine is affiliated with the National Institute on Drug Abuse in the United States. Their work is connected to this institution, contributing to scientific research in the field related to drug abuse and its impacts.

There are no individual papers listed for this researcher, nor are there recorded frequent co-authors or common publication venues. Additionally, no specific book publications have been documented.

No particular main or subfields of study are provided for Jack Blaine, and there are no defined main topics of work mentioned.

The available data does not list any awards won by this scientist.

This profile reflects the available source data without additional interpretative content.

Best Publications

  • Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study.

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Lynne Siqueland;Jack Blaine;Arlene Frank

  • Psychotherapy for Opiate Addicts: Does It Help?

    Woody Ge;Luborsky L;McLellan At;O'Brien Cp

  • Effect of Prize-Based Incentives on Outcomes in Stimulant Abusers in Outpatient Psychosocial Treatment Programs: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network Study

    Nancy M. Petry;Jessica M. Peirce;Maxine L. Stitzer;Jack Blaine

  • Extended vs Short-term Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Treatment of Opioid-Addicted Youth: A Randomized Trial

    George E. Woody;Sabrina A. Poole;Geetha Subramaniam;Karen Dugosh

  • WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: overview of methods and results

    B Üstün;W Compton;D Mager;T Babor

  • Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study.

    Jessica M. Peirce;Nancy M. Petry;Maxine L. Stitzer;Jack Blaine

  • Concordance of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN

    Linda B Cottler;Bridget F Grant;Jack Blaine;Vanetsanos Mavreas

  • Cocaine Dependence With and Without PTSD Among Subjects in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study

    Lisa M. Najavits;David R. Gastfriend;Jacques P. Barber;Sharon Reif

  • Severity of psychiatric symptoms as a predictor of benefits from psychotherapy: The Veterans Administration-Penn study.

    George E Woody;A. T. McLellan;L. Luborsky;C. P. O'Brien

  • The CIDI-core substance abuse and dependence questions: Cross-cultural and nosological issues

    Linda B. Cottler;Lee N. Robins;B. F. Grant;Jack D. Blaine

  • Concordance between ICD-10 alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by the AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN: results of a cross-national study

    Charles B Pull;John B Saunders;Venetsanos Mavreas;Linda B Cottler

  • Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorders

    John M. Roll;Nancy M. Petry;Maxine L. Stitzer;Mary L. Brecht

  • Nosological comparisons of alcohol and drug diagnoses: a multisite, multi-instrument international study

    Deborah Hasin;Bridget F Grant;Linda Cottler;Jack Blaine

  • The Relationship Between Cocaine Craving, Psychosocial Treatment, and Subsequent Cocaine Use

    Roger D. Weiss;Margaret L. Griffin;Carissa Mazurick;Benjamin Berkman

  • Priority actions to improve the care of persons with co-occurring substance abuse and other mental disorders: a call to action.

    Charles P. O'Brien;Dennis S. Charney;Lydia Lewis;James W. Cornish

  • The effect of 12-step self-help group attendance and participation on drug use outcomes among cocaine-dependent patients

    Roger D. Weiss;Roger D. Weiss;Margaret L. Griffin;Margaret L. Griffin;Robert J. Gallop;Lisa M. Najavits;Lisa M. Najavits

  • The National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Rationale and methods.

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Lynne Siqueland;Jack Blaine;Arlene Frank

  • Retention in psychosocial treatment of cocaine dependence: predictors and impact on outcome.

    Lynne Siqueland;Paul Crits-Christoph;Robert Gallop;Jacques P. Barber

  • Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS): reliability and validity of a clinician-administered interview for DSM-IV substance use disorders.

    Gloria M. Miele;Kenneth M. Carpenter;Melissa Smith Cockerham;Kristin Dietz Trautman

  • Psychotherapy for opiate addicts.

    Woody Ge;Luborsky L;McLellan At;O'Brien Cp

  • Extended vs. short-term buprenorphinenaloxone for treatment of opioid addicted youth: A randomized trial

    George Woody;Sabrina Poole;Geetha Subramaniam;Karen Dugosh

Frequent Co-Authors

George E. Woody
George E. Woody University of Pennsylvania
Jacques P. Barber
Jacques P. Barber Adelphi University
Roger D. Weiss
Roger D. Weiss Harvard University
Michael E. Thase
Michael E. Thase University of Pennsylvania
Lisa M. Najavits
Lisa M. Najavits University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Lynne Siqueland
Lynne Siqueland Children's Center
Paul Crits-Christoph
Paul Crits-Christoph University of Pennsylvania
Lester Luborsky
Lester Luborsky University of Pennsylvania
Deborah S. Hasin
Deborah S. Hasin Columbia University
Margaret L. Griffin
Margaret L. Griffin Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a broad range of career possibilities. Many students are now turning to flexible online programs to deepen their expertise or switch fields. Key options include psychology, counseling, and education—professions that blend social insight with practical impact.

For those passionate about mental health, psyd online programs offer advanced practice-focused training in clinical psychology. If your interest lies in supporting families and couples, marriage and family therapy programs online provide a pathway to become a licensed therapist in this rewarding field.

Cost and program length are often crucial considerations. Learners seeking affordability can explore online masters in psychology for budget-friendly pathways to valuable credentials. For educational leaders, online doctorate of education programs allow working professionals to advance their careers quickly with fast-track formats.

With a variety of accredited online options available, these degrees can lead to meaningful roles in research, counseling, teaching, and administration—helping you shape positive change in society.

Best Scientists Citing Jack Blaine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles