World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
12683
World Ranking
6076
National Ranking
283

Klaus Wehrle publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Wehrle sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 397 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Klaus Wehrle D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Wehrle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus Wehrle is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research spans several fields within computer science and engineering, focusing particularly on areas such as information systems, computer networks and communications, industrial and manufacturing engineering, artificial intelligence, and control and systems engineering.

Their work covers multiple main topics, including:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques

Klaus Wehrle has contributed to various peer-reviewed publications. Some of their recent papers are:

  • Challenges and Opportunities in Securing the Industrial Internet of Things, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
  • A Computer Science Perspective on Digital Transformation in Production, 2022, ACM Transactions on Internet of Things
  • Anomaly Detection in Maritime AIS Tracks: A Review of Recent Approaches, 2022, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
  • Cookie Banners and Privacy Policies: Measuring the Impact of the GDPR on the Web, 2021, ACM Transactions on the Web
  • Blockchain-based privacy preservation for supply chains supporting lightweight multi-hop information accountability, 2021, Information Processing & Management

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Jan Pennekamp
  • Martin Henze
  • Ike Kunze
  • Eric Wagner
  • Konrad Wolsing

Klaus Wehrle's research has been published in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IET conference proceedings
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)
  • Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek

Their work often intersects with advancing security and privacy in industrial internet of things (IoT) environments, digital transformation in production systems, and methods for anomaly detection. This aligns with their engagement in topics like blockchain applications, network security, and flexible manufacturing systems.

Best Publications

  • Peer-to-Peer Systems and Applications

    Ralf Steinmetz;Klaus Wehrle

  • Privacy in the Internet of Things: threats and challenges

    Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf;Oscar Garcia Morchon;Klaus Wehrle

  • A Performance Comparison of Recent Network Simulators

    E. Weingartner;H. vom Lehn;K. Wehrle

  • Website Fingerprinting at Internet Scale

    Andriy Panchenko;Fabian Lanze;Andreas Zinnen;Martin Henze

  • Security Challenges in the IP-based Internet of Things

    Tobias Heer;Oscar Garcia-Morchon;René Hummen;Sye Loong Keoh

  • Modeling and Tools for Network Simulation

    Klaus Wehrle;Mesut Gnes;James Gross

  • Accurate prediction of power consumption in sensor networks

    O. Landsiedel;K. Wehrle;S. Gotz

  • Challenges and Opportunities in Securing the Industrial Internet of Things

    Martin Serror;Sacha Hack;Martin Henze;Marko Schuba

  • FootPath: Accurate map-based indoor navigation using smartphones

    Jo Agila Bitsch Link;Paul Smith;Nicolai Viol;Klaus Wehrle

  • A comprehensive approach to privacy in the cloud-based Internet of Things

    Martin Henze;Lars Hermerschmidt;Daniel Kerpen;Roger Häußling

  • A Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Arbitrary Blockchain Content on Bitcoin

    Roman Matzutt;Jens Hiller;Martin Henze;Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf

  • Linux Network Architecture

    Klaus Wehrle;Frank Pahlke;Hartmut Ritter;Daniel Muller

  • 6LoWPAN fragmentation attacks and mitigation mechanisms

    René Hummen;Jens Hiller;Hanno Wirtz;Martin Henze

  • CoinParty: Secure Multi-Party Mixing of Bitcoins

    Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf;Fred Grossmann;Martin Henze;Nicolas Inden

  • Towards viable certificate-based authentication for the internet of things

    René Hummen;Jan H. Ziegeldorf;Hossein Shafagh;Shahid Raza

  • Delegation-based Authentication and Authorization for the IP-based Internet of Things

    René Hummen;Hossein Shafagh;Shahid Raza;Thiemo Voigt

  • KleeNet: discovering insidious interaction bugs in wireless sensor networks before deployment

    Raimondas Sasnauskas;Olaf Landsiedel;Muhammad Hamad Alizai;Carsten Weise

  • Anomaly Detection in Maritime AIS Tracks: A Review of Recent Approaches

    Unknown

  • EEG-based automatic emotion recognition: Feature extraction, selection and classification methods

    Pascal Ackermann;Christian Kohlschein;Jo Agila Bitsch;Klaus Wehrle

  • Bursty traffic over bursty links

    Muhammad Hamad Alizai;Olaf Landsiedel;Jó Ágila Bitsch Link;Stefan Götz

  • KleeNet : Discovering Insidious Interaction Bugs in Wireless Sensor Networks Before Deployment Categories and Subject Descriptors

    Raimondas Sasnauskas;Olaf Landsiedel;Muhammad Hamad Alizai;Carsten Weise

Frequent Co-Authors

James Gross
James Gross Royal Institute of Technology
Thomas Engel
Thomas Engel University of Luxembourg
Ralf Steinmetz
Ralf Steinmetz Technical University of Darmstadt
Christian Brecher
Christian Brecher RWTH Aachen University
Martina Ziefle
Martina Ziefle RWTH Aachen University
Bernhard Rumpe
Bernhard Rumpe RWTH Aachen University
Ion Stoica
Ion Stoica University of California, Berkeley
Georg Carle
Georg Carle Technical University of Munich
Peter Vary
Peter Vary RWTH Aachen University
Antonello Monti
Antonello Monti RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in Computer Science opens the door to a wide variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students are now turning to the best online degree programs for flexibility and access to accredited institutions across the country.

If your interests align with creative technology, consider an online video game design degree. This program blends coding, storytelling, and visual arts, preparing graduates for in-demand jobs in the gaming industry.

For those focused on tech security, a strong option is a cybersecurity degree online. Cybersecurity roles continue to grow rapidly as organizations prioritize data protection.

Alternatively, applying technical skills to the built environment is possible with the best online construction management degree, combining management principles with practical tech solutions for construction projects.

These online degree pathways allow you to tailor your studies to your interests, align with industry needs, and pursue rewarding careers in emerging tech fields.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Wehrle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles