World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
43
Citations
11132
World Ranking
6023
National Ranking
321

Branko G. Celler publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Branko G. Celler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 281 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Branko G. Celler D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Branko G. Celler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to telehealth services for the management of chronic disease

Overview

Branko G. Celler is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine and engineering, with notable contributions in the fields of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, biomedical engineering, surgery, control and systems engineering, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's work spans several interconnected research topics including cardiovascular health and disease prevention, non-invasive vital sign monitoring, heart rate variability and autonomic control, hemodynamic monitoring and therapy, blood pressure and hypertension studies, COVID-19 diagnosis using artificial intelligence, and phonocardiography and auscultation techniques.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Machine and Deep Learning for Tuberculosis Detection on Chest X-Rays: Systematic Literature Review," 2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Home telemonitoring for chronic disease management: Perceptions of users and factors influencing adoption," 2021, Health Informatics Journal
  • "Artificial Intelligence Based Blood Pressure Estimation From Auscultatory and Oscillometric Waveforms: A Methodological Review," 2020, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
  • "A Novel Automated Blood Pressure Estimation Algorithm Using Sequences of Korotkoff Sounds," 2020, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • "Digital care technologies in people with dementia living in long-term care facilities to prevent falls and manage behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review," 2021, European Journal of Ageing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Branko G. Celler include Ahmadreza Argha, Mark Butlin, A. Yong, Alberto Avolio, and Steven W. Su.

Their work appears frequently in several publication venues such as:

  • Journal of Hypertension
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • Physiological Measurement
  • Health Informatics Journal

Branko G. Celler's research outputs highlight a strong focus on telehealth services and chronic disease management. This is acknowledged by an IEEE Fellow award received in 2014 for contributions to telehealth services for the management of chronic disease.

Best Publications

  • Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring

    D.M. Karantonis;M.R. Narayanan;M. Mathie;N.H. Lovell

  • Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement.

    Merryn J Mathie;Adelle C F Coster;Nigel H Lovell;Branko G Celler

  • Classification of basic daily movements using a triaxial accelerometer.

    M. J. Mathie;Branko G. Celler;Nigel H. Lovell;A. C. F. Coster

  • Using information technology to improve the management of chronic disease.

    Branko G Celler;Nigel H Lovell;Jim Basilakis

  • Detection of daily physical activities using a triaxial accelerometer.

    M. J. Mathie;A. C. F. Coster;N. H. Lovell;B. G. Celler

  • Backstepping Control of Electro-Hydraulic System Based on Extended-State-Observer With Plant Dynamics Largely Unknown

    Qing Guo;Yi Zhang;Branko G. Celler;Steven W. Su

  • Classification of a known sequence of motions and postures from accelerometry data using adapted Gaussian mixture models

    Felicity R Allen;Eliathamby Ambikairajah;Nigel H Lovell;Nigel H Lovell;Branko G Celler

  • Remote monitoring of health status of the elderly at home. A multidisciplinary project on aging at the University of New South Wales

    B.G. Celler;W. Earnshaw;E.D. Ilsar;L. Betbeder-Matibet

  • Patients’ Perceptions of a Home Telecare System

    Mohammadreza Rahimpour;Nigel H. Lovell;Nigel H. Lovell;Branko G. Celler;John McCormick

  • Information technology in primary health care.

    Nigel H Lovell;Branko G Celler

  • A pilot study of long-term monitoring of human movements in the home using accelerometry.

    Merryn J Mathie;Adelle C F Coster;Nigel H. Lovell;Branko G. Celler

  • Nonlinear Modeling and Control of Human Heart Rate Response During Exercise With Various Work Load Intensities

    T.M. Cheng;A.V. Savkin;B.G. Celler;S.W. Su

  • The potential impact of home telecare on clinical practice.

    Branko G Celler;Nigel H Lovell;Daniel K Y Chan

  • Neural Adaptive Backstepping Control of a Robotic Manipulator With Prescribed Performance Constraint

    Qing Guo;Yi Zhang;Branko G. Celler;Steven W. Su

  • A system for monitoring posture and physical activity using accelerometers

    M.J. Mathie;J. Basilakis;B.G. Celler

  • A monitoring apparatus for an ambulatory subject and a method for monitoring the same

    Merryn Joy Sampark Co Mathie;Branko G Sampark Co Celler;Nigel H Sampark Co Lovell

  • Ion currents underlying sinoatrial node pacemaker activity: a new single cell mathematical model.

    Socrates Dokos;Branko Celler;Nigel Lovell

  • Identification and Control for Heart Rate Regulation During Treadmill Exercise

    S.W. Su;Lu Wang;B.G. Celler;A.V. Savkin

  • Accelerometry Based Classification of Walking Patterns Using Time-frequency Analysis

    N.H. Lovell;Ning Wang;E. Ambikairajah;B.G. Celler

  • An instrumentation system for the remote monitoring of changes in functional health status of the elderly at home

    B.G. Celler;T. Hesketh;W. Earnshaw;E. Ilsar

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel H. Lovell
Nigel H. Lovell University of New South Wales
Andrey V. Savkin
Andrey V. Savkin University of New South Wales
Eliathamby Ambikairajah
Eliathamby Ambikairajah University of New South Wales
Stephen J. Redmond
Stephen J. Redmond University College Dublin
Farah Magrabi
Farah Magrabi Macquarie University
Julien Epps
Julien Epps University of New South Wales
Lin Ye
Lin Ye Southern University of Science and Technology
Surya Nepal
Surya Nepal Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Peng Xu
Peng Xu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Dezhong Yao
Dezhong Yao University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in broadening their career prospects beyond traditional engineering and technology fields, there are several fastest MBA programs available online. These accelerated programs are designed for professionals seeking managerial roles in tech and engineering industries, offering flexible study options and quicker completion times.

Skills in law and administration are also highly valued in technology-driven workplaces. Those wishing to enter legal support roles might consider enrolling in a paralegal accelerated program. These programs provide a fast track to careers assisting legal teams in intellectual property, contracts, and compliance matters within engineering firms.

Additionally, a strong foundation in finance can sharpen your business acumen. A bookkeeping course is a practical choice for those who want skills in managing budgets and accounts for tech-focused businesses or startups.

Finally, those aiming to move into administrative roles can pursue office administration degrees. Such qualifications are vital for effective project management and operational support within engineering and technology organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Branko G. Celler

Trending Scientists