World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alfons Schwarzenboeck

Alfons Schwarzenboeck

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
3713
World Ranking
9001
National Ranking
410

Alfons Schwarzenboeck publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfons Schwarzenboeck sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Alfons Schwarzenboeck D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfons Schwarzenboeck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alfons Schwarzenboeck is affiliated with the University of Clermont Auvergne in France. Their research spans multiple areas within Earth and Planetary Sciences, Environmental Science, and Engineering, contributing extensively to the understanding of atmospheric processes and aerospace engineering challenges.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

More specific subfields where they have focused their work are:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Pollution

Key research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory

Frequent coauthors collaborating on research efforts are:

  • Julien Delanoe͏̈
  • Fabien Dezitter
  • Louis Jaffeux
  • Pierre Coutris
  • Alexis Berne

Common publication venues for the scientist include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • SAE International Journal of Aerospace

Selected recent publications feature the following titles, years, and venues:

  • Overview of aerosol optical properties over southern West Africa from DACCIWA aircraft measurements, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Microphysical processes producing high ice water contents (HIWCs) in tropical convective clouds during the HAIC-HIWC field campaign: evaluation of simulations using bulk microphysical schemes, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Dependence of Ice Microphysical Properties On Environmental Parameters: Results from HAIC-HIWC Cayenne Field Campaign, 2021, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Microphysical processes producing high ice water contents (HIWCs) in tropical convective clouds during the HAIC-HIWC field campaign: dominant role of secondary ice production, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Comparisons of Cloud In Situ Microphysical Properties of Deep Convective Clouds to Appendix D/P Using Data from the High-Altitude Ice Crystals-High Ice Water Content and High Ice Water Content-RADAR I Flight Campaigns, 2021, SAE International Journal of Aerospace

Best Publications

  • HyMeX-SOP1: The Field Campaign Dedicated to Heavy Precipitation and Flash Flooding in the Northwestern Mediterranean

    Véronique Ducrocq;Isabelle Braud;Silvio Davolio;Rossella Ferretti

  • EUREC 4 A

    Bjorn Stevens;Sandrine Bony;David Farrell;Felix Ament

  • Overview of the Chemistry-Aerosol Mediterranean Experiment/Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing on the Mediterranean Climate (ChArMEx/ADRIMED) summer 2013 campaign

    Marc Mallet;François Dulac;Paola Formenti;Pierre Nabat

  • In situ, satellite measurement and model evidence on the dominant regional contribution to fine particulate matter levels in the Paris megacity

    M. Beekmann;A. S. H. Prévôt;F. Drewnick;J. Sciare;J. Sciare

  • Chemical and aerosol characterisation of the troposphere over West Africa during the monsoon period as part of AMMA

    C. E. Reeves;P. Formenti;Charbel Afif;Charbel Afif;Gérard Ancellet

  • The Dynamics–Aerosol–Chemistry–Cloud Interactions in West Africa Field Campaign: Overview and Research Highlights

    Cyrille Flamant;Peter Knippertz;Andreas H. Fink;Aristide Akpo

  • Cloud processing of mineral dust: direct comparison of cloud residual and clear sky particles during AMMA aircraft campaign in summer 2006

    A. Matsuki;A. Matsuki;Alfons Schwarzenboeck;H. Venzac;P. Laj

  • New particle formation events measured on board the ATR-42 aircraft during the EUCAARI campaign

    S. Crumeyrolle;H. E. Manninen;K. Sellegri;G. Roberts

  • Increase of the aerosol hygroscopicity by cloud processing in a mesoscale convective system: a case study from the AMMA campaign

    S. Crumeyrolle;L. Gomes;Pierre Tulet;A. Matsuki

  • Ice Crystal Sizes in High Ice Water Content Clouds. Part II: Statistics of Mass Diameter Percentiles in Tropical Convection Observed during the HAIC/HIWC Project

    Delphine Leroy;Emmanuel Fontaine;Alfons Schwarzenboeck;John Walter Strapp

  • Incorporation of aerosol particles between 25 and 850 nm into cloud elements: measurements with a new complementary sampling system

    Alfons Schwarzenboeck;Jost Heintzenberg;Stephan Mertes

  • Characterizing the impact of urban emissions on regional aerosol particles: airborne measurements during the MEGAPOLI experiment

    E. J. Freney;K. Sellegri;F. Canonaco;A. Colomb

  • Vertical distribution of microphysical properties of Arctic springtime low-level mixed-phase clouds over the Greenland and Norwegian seas

    Guillaume Mioche;Guillaume Mioche;Olivier Jourdan;Olivier Jourdan;Julien Delanoë;Christophe Gourbeyre;Christophe Gourbeyre

  • Physical and optical properties of 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption aerosol: ground-based, Lidar and airborne measurements in France

    M. Hervo;Boris Quennehen;N. I. Kristiansen;J. Boulon

  • Design, construction and commissioning of the Braunschweig Icing Wind Tunnel

    Stephan E. Bansmer;Arne Baumert;Stephan Sattler;Inken Knop

  • Source identification and airborne chemical characterisation of aerosol pollution from long-range transport over Greenland during POLARCAT summer campaign 2008

    Julia Schmale;Jodi Schneider;Gérard Ancellet;Boris Quennehen

  • Overview of aerosol optical properties over southern West Africa from DACCIWA aircraft measurements

    Cyrielle Denjean;Thierry Bourrianne;Frédéric Burnet;Marc Mallet

  • Indications for stellar-crystal fragmentation in Arctic clouds

    Alfons Schwarzenboeck;V. Shcherbakov;R. Lefèvre;J.-F. Gayet

  • Airborne measurements of aerosol optical properties related to early spring transport of mid-latitude sources into the Arctic

    R. A. de Villiers;G. Ancellet;J. Pelon;B. Quennehen

  • Ice Crystal Sizes in High Ice Water Content Clouds. Part I: On the Computation of Median Mass Diameter from In Situ Measurements

    D. Leroy;E. Fontaine;A. Schwarzenboeck;J. W. Strapp

  • Constraining mass–diameter relations from hydrometeor images and cloud radar reflectivities in tropical continental and oceanic convective anvils

    E. Fontaine;Alfons Schwarzenboeck;Julien Delanoë;Wolfram Wobrock

  • Aerosol influences on low-level clouds in the West African monsoon

    Jonathan W. Taylor;Sophie L. Haslett;Keith Bower;Michael Flynn

Frequent Co-Authors

Karine Sellegri
Karine Sellegri University of Clermont Auvergne
Joel Brito
Joel Brito IMT Lille Douai
Gérard Ancellet
Gérard Ancellet Sorbonne University
Alain Protat
Alain Protat Bureau of Meteorology
Christiane Voigt
Christiane Voigt German Aerospace Center
Cyrille Flamant
Cyrille Flamant Sorbonne University
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester
Andreas Stohl
Andreas Stohl University of Vienna
Jean-François Gayet
Jean-François Gayet University of Clermont Auvergne
Peter Knippertz
Peter Knippertz Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students find value in flexible programs, such as those offered through an eds to edd program, which allow educators and professionals to deepen their expertise remotely.

Social work also plays a crucial role in environmental advocacy and community resilience, and aspiring professionals may consider fully funded dsw programs online. These programs provide an affordable path toward leadership in social and environmental justice.

For students seeking versatile educational options, a cheap online general studies degree offers broad foundational knowledge that can complement specialized environmental training.

Finally, those starting their academic journey may value the accessibility of the easiest bachelor degree to get online, which can provide a flexible and manageable route into higher education and eventually, environmental career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Alfons Schwarzenboeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles