World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7460 6955 4034 3665 127 9303

Thomas G. Reio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas G. Reio between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas G. Reio published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2011. 9 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2011. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1976 2025

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas G. Reio: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 4
2001 1
2002 3
2003 1
2004 3
2005 4
2006 7
2007 2
2008 3
2009 5
2010 5
2011 20
2012 9
2013 9
2014 12
2015 8
2016 9
2017 6
2018 6
2019 5
2020 8
2021 2
2022 4
2023 4
2024 6
2025 3
Total 152
Download as CSV

Thomas G. Reio publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas G. Reio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas G. Reio D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas G. Reio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas G. Reio is affiliated with Florida International University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Social Sciences and Psychology, with notable contributions to the subfields of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, and General Health Professions.

Their main topics of study cover a range of areas including Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation, Psychological and Educational Research Studies, Innovations in Medical Education, Workplace Violence and Bullying, Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions, and the impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Satyanarayana Parayitam, Kim Nimon, Ravikumar Alagiri Swamy, Rajesh Elangovan, and Tonette S. Rocco. Collaborative work with these coauthors appears multiple times across their publications.

They have published extensively in a variety of venues, notably in Human Resource Development International and Human Resource Development Quarterly, with six publications each. Other frequent venues include New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development and Human Resource Development Review, each with four publications, and the Journal of Managerial Psychology.

Recent publications by Thomas G. Reio include:

  • The COVID-19 impact on employee performance and satisfaction: a moderated moderated-mediation conditional model of job crafting and employee engagement, 2022, Human Resource Development International
  • Faculty Development: A Systematic Review of Review Studies, 2020, New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development
  • Curiosity and Well-Being in Emerging Adulthood, 2020, New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development
  • The Ten Research Questions: An Analytic Tool for Critiquing Empirical Studies and Teaching Research Rigor, 2021, Human Resource Development Review
  • Responding to Low Coefficient Alpha: Potential Alternatives to the File Drawer, 2020, Human Resource Development Review

Best Publications

  • Employee engagement: an examination of antecedent and outcome variables

    Unknown

  • Employee Engagement and Well-Being: A Moderation Model and Implications for Practice

    Brad Shuck;Thomas G. Reio

  • Career benefits associated with mentoring for mentors: A meta-analysis

    Rajashi Ghosh;Thomas G. Reio

  • The Threat of Common Method Variance Bias to Theory Building

    Thomas G. Reio

  • Human Resource Development Practices and Employee Engagement: Examining the Connection With Employee Turnover Intentions

    Brad Shuck;Devon Twyford;Thomas G. Reio;Angie Shuck

  • A longitudinal study of student-teacher relationship quality, difficult temperament, and risky behavior from childhood to early adolescence

    Kathleen Moritz Rudasill;Thomas G. Reio;Natalie Stipanovic;Jennifer E. Taylor

  • Antecedents and outcomes of workplace incivility: Implications for human resource development research and practice

    Thomas G. Reio;Rajashi Ghosh

  • The Employee Engagement Scale: Initial Evidence for Construct Validity and Implications for Theory and Practice

    Brad Shuck;Jill L. Adelson;Thomas G. Reio

  • Field investigation of the relationship among adult curiosity, workplace learning, and job performance

    Thomas G. Reio;Albert Wiswell

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis Implications for Theory, Research, and Practice

    Thomas G. Reio;Brad Shuck

  • AFFECT, CURIOSITY, AND SOCIALIZATION. RELATED LEARNING: A PATH ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS TO JOB PERFORMANCE

    Thomas G. Reio;Jamie L. Callahan

  • Emotions as a lens to explore teacher identity and change: A commentary

    Thomas G. Reio

  • The Measurement and Conceptualization of Curiosity

    Thomas G. Reio;Joseph M. Petrosko;Albert K. Wiswell;Juthamas Thongsukmag

  • Human resource management systems and firm performance

    Karen L. Ferguson;Thomas G. Reio

  • A Critique of Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model

    Thomas G. Reio;Tonette S. Rocco;Douglas H. Smith;Elegance Chang

  • From motivation to organizational commitment of volunteers in non‐profit sport organizations: The role of job satisfaction

    Hyejin Bang;Stephen Ross;Thomas G. Reio

  • Managing Workplace Incivility: The Role of Conflict Management Styles--Antecedent or Antidote?.

    Jeannie Trudel;Thomas G. Reio

  • Do students' beliefs about writing relate to their writing self-efficacy, apprehension, and performance?

    Joanne Sanders-Reio;Patricia A. Alexander;Thomas G. Reio;Isadore Newman

  • Nonexperimental research: strengths, weaknesses and issues of precision

    Thomas G. Reio

  • The Employee Engagement Landscape and HRD: How Do We Link Theory and Scholarship to Current Practice?

    Brad Shuck;Thomas G. Reio

  • Field Investigation of the Relationship among Adult Curiosity, Workplace Learning, and Job Performance. [and] Invited Reaction: Relationship among Adult Curiosity, Workplace Learning, and Job Performance.

    Thomas G. Reio;Albert Wiswell;Robert W. Rowden

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia A. Alexander
Patricia A. Alexander University of Maryland, College Park
Jamie L. Callahan
Jamie L. Callahan Northumbria University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens a wide range of educational and career opportunities, with many online degrees supporting flexible learning. A key pathway for psychology graduates is becoming a licensed therapist, though requirements vary by location. For example, if you are interested in practicing in California, check the Irvine licensed therapist requirements which detail specific state guidelines.

Similarly, learning how to become a licensed therapist in Irving can help those looking to work in Texas meet local education and licensure expectations. In Florida, aspiring professionals should review the Jacksonville licensed therapist education requirements to ensure all state-specific steps are followed.

In New Jersey, those seeking to work in senior counseling roles should understand how to become a licensed therapist in Jersey City as requirements may differ from other regions. Exploring accredited online degrees and researching each state’s licensing process can help you tailor your studies to your career goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas G. Reio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles