World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
9843
World Ranking
5114
National Ranking
2288

Jennifer M. Bossert publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer M. Bossert sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jennifer M. Bossert D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer M. Bossert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jennifer M. Bossert is affiliated with the National Institute on Drug Abuse in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, and physiology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, memory and neural mechanisms, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, pain mechanisms and treatments, receptor mechanisms and signaling, neuropeptides and animal physiology, and neuroendocrine regulation and behavior.

Jennifer M. Bossert's recent publications include:

  • In a Rat Model of Opioid Maintenance, the G Protein-Biased Mu Opioid Receptor Agonist TRV130 Decreases Relapse to Oxycodone Seeking and Taking and Prevents Oxycodone-Induced Brain Hypoxia, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Animal Models of Drug Relapse and Craving after Voluntary Abstinence: A Review, 2021, Pharmacological Reviews
  • Role of Projections between Piriform Cortex and Orbitofrontal Cortex in Relapse to Fentanyl Seeking after Palatable Food Choice-Induced Voluntary Abstinence, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Effect of the dopamine stabilizer (-)-OSU6162 on potentiated incubation of opioid craving after electric barrier-induced voluntary abstinence, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Fos-expressing neuronal ensemble in rat ventromedial prefrontal cortex encodes cocaine seeking but not food seeking in rats, 2020, Addiction Biology

Jennifer M. Bossert has frequently published in several venues, including:

  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist has collaborated often with several coauthors, such as:

  • Yavin Shaham
  • Ida Fredriksson
  • Ashley Batista
  • Kiera E. Caldwell
  • Bruce T. Hope

Best Publications

  • Context-induced relapse to drug seeking: a review

    Hans S Crombag;Jennifer M Bossert;Eisuke Koya;Yavin Shaham

  • The reinstatement model of drug relapse: recent neurobiological findings, emerging research topics, and translational research

    Jennifer M. Bossert;Nathan J. Marchant;Donna J. Calu;Yavin Shaham

  • Central amygdala ERK signaling pathway is critical to incubation of cocaine craving

    Lin Lu;Bruce T Hope;Jack Dempsey;Shirley Y Liu

  • A Single Infusion of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor into the Ventral Tegmental Area Induces Long-Lasting Potentiation of Cocaine Seeking after Withdrawal

    Lin Lu;Jack Dempsey;Shirley Y. Liu;Jennifer M. Bossert

  • Ventral medial prefrontal cortex neuronal ensembles mediate context-induced relapse to heroin.

    Jennifer M Bossert;Anna L Stern;Florence R M Theberge;Carlo Cifani

  • Differential Effects of Blockade of Dopamine D1-Family Receptors in Nucleus Accumbens Core or Shell on Reinstatement of Heroin Seeking Induced by Contextual and Discrete Cues

    Jennifer M. Bossert;Gabriela C. Poles;Kristina A. Wihbey;Eisuke Koya

  • The anxiogenic drug yohimbine reinstates methamphetamine seeking in a rat model of drug relapse.

    Jack D Shepard;Jennifer M Bossert;Shirley Y Liu;Yavin Shaham

  • Neurobiology of relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking: an update and clinical implications.

    Jennifer M. Bossert;Udi E. Ghitza;Lin Lu;David H. Epstein

  • Targeted disruption of cocaine-activated nucleus accumbens neurons prevents context-specific sensitization.

    Eisuke Koya;Sam A Golden;Brandon K Harvey;Danielle H Guez-Barber

  • A role of ventral tegmental area glutamate in contextual cue-induced relapse to heroin seeking.

    Jennifer M. Bossert;Shirley Y. Liu;Lin Lu;Yavin Shaham

  • New technologies for examining the role of neuronal ensembles in drug addiction and fear

    Fabio C. Cruz;Eisuke Koya;Eisuke Koya;Danielle H. Guez-Barber;Danielle H. Guez-Barber;Jennifer M. Bossert

  • Activation of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates context-induced relapse to heroin seeking.

    Jennifer M Bossert;Sarah M Gray;Lin Lu;Yavin Shaham

  • Role of Projections from Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex to Nucleus Accumbens Shell in Context-Induced Reinstatement of Heroin Seeking

    Jennifer M. Bossert;Anna L. Stern;Florence R.M. Theberge;Nathan J. Marchant

  • Role of ventral medial prefrontal cortex in incubation of cocaine craving.

    Eisuke Koya;Jamie L. Uejima;Kristina A. Wihbey;Jennifer M. Bossert

  • Cocaine-induced CREB phosphorylation in nucleus accumbens of cocaine-sensitized rats is enabled by enhanced activation of extracellular signal-related kinase, but not protein kinase A

    Brandi J. Mattson;Jennifer M. Bossert;Danielle E. Simmons;Naohito Nozaki

  • Systemic and Central Amygdala Injections of the mGluR2/3 Agonist LY379268 Attenuate the Expression of Incubation of Cocaine Craving

    Lin Lu;Jamie L. Uejima;Sarah M. Gray;Jennifer M. Bossert

  • Effect of the Novel Positive Allosteric Modulator of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 2 AZD8529 on Incubation of Methamphetamine Craving After Prolonged Voluntary Abstinence in a Rat Model.

    Daniele Caprioli;Marco Venniro;Tamara Zeric;Xuan Li

  • Incubation of Methamphetamine Craving Is Associated with Selective Increases in Expression of Bdnf and Trkb, Glutamate Receptors, and Epigenetic Enzymes in Cue-Activated Fos-Expressing Dorsal Striatal Neurons

    Xuan Li;F. Javier Rubio;Tamara Zeric;Jennifer M. Bossert

  • Role of nucleus accumbens shell neuronal ensembles in context-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking.

    Fabio C Cruz;Klil R Babin;Rodrigo M Leao;Evan M Goldart

  • The central amygdala nucleus is critical for incubation of methamphetamine craving.

    Xuan Li;Tamara Zeric;Sarita Kambhampati;Jennifer M Bossert

Frequent Co-Authors

Yavin Shaham
Yavin Shaham National Institute on Drug Abuse
Bruce T. Hope
Bruce T. Hope National Institute on Drug Abuse
Brandon K. Harvey
Brandon K. Harvey National Institute on Drug Abuse
Lin Lu
Lin Lu Peking University
Antonello Bonci
Antonello Bonci National Institute on Drug Abuse
David H. Epstein
David H. Epstein National Institute on Drug Abuse
Qing-Rong Liu
Qing-Rong Liu National Institutes of Health
Marisela Morales
Marisela Morales National Institute on Drug Abuse
Sam A. Golden
Sam A. Golden University of Washington
Ofer Yizhar
Ofer Yizhar Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer M. Bossert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles