World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 35 9194 8491 3883 3516 98 4936

Chitra D. Mandyam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chitra D. Mandyam between 2000 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chitra D. Mandyam published across 25 years, from 2000 to 2024, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2018. 7 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2018. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications
2000 2024

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chitra D. Mandyam: publications per year, 2000 to 2024
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 0
2006 2
2007 7
2008 5
2009 1
2010 1
2011 1
2012 3
2013 3
2014 5
2015 12
2016 7
2017 9
2018 14
2019 3
2020 8
2021 6
2022 3
2023 3
2024 4
Total 105
Download as CSV

Chitra D. Mandyam publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chitra D. Mandyam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 98 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 98
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Chitra D. Mandyam D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chitra D. Mandyam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296 35
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Chitra D. Mandyam is affiliated with the Veterans Health Administration in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Neuroscience. Their research primarily spans areas including Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology, with particular focus on neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, memory and neural mechanisms, and neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience

Within Neuroscience, their subfields of study involve:

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology

Their work covers diverse topics such as:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Barrier Structure and Function Studies

Mandyam has published research articles in several prominent venues, with notable frequent publications in:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Brain Sciences
  • Brain Plasticity
  • Brain Structure and Function
  • Neuropharmacology

Recent papers include:

  • Plasticity in the Hippocampus, Neurogenesis and Drugs of Abuse, 2021, Brain Sciences
  • Synaptic Plasticity and its Modulation by Alcohol, 2020, Brain Plasticity
  • SCH23390 Reduces Methamphetamine Self-Administration and Prevents Methamphetamine-Induced Striatal LTD, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Chronic ethanol exposure differentially alters neuronal function in the medial prefrontal cortex and dentate gyrus, 2020, Neuropharmacology
  • Lipopolysaccharide Exposure Differentially Alters Plasma and Brain Inflammatory Markers in Adult Male and Female Rats, 2022, Brain Sciences

In addition to journal articles, Mandyam has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Frontiers Media:

  • Advances in Adult Neurogenesis, 2024

Frequent collaborators in Mandyam's research include:

  • Yosef Avchalumov
  • Wulfran Trenet
  • Juan Piña-Crespo
  • Marisa Roberto
  • Sucharita S. Somkuwar

Best Publications

  • Dynamic contribution of nestin-expressing stem cells to adult neurogenesis.

    Diane C. Lagace;Mary C. Whitman;Michele A. Noonan;Jessica L. Ables

  • Recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex neurons during alcohol withdrawal predicts cognitive impairment and excessive alcohol drinking.

    Olivier George;Chelsea Sanders;John Freiling;Edward Grigoryan

  • Determination of key aspects of precursor cell proliferation, cell cycle length and kinetics in the adult mouse subgranular zone.

    Chitra D. Mandyam;Gwyndolen C. Harburg;Amelia J. Eisch

  • Extended access to cocaine self-administration produces long-lasting prefrontal cortex-dependent working memory impairments.

    Olivier George;Chitra D Mandyam;Sunmee Wee;George F Koob

  • Long-lasting Reduction in Hippocampal Neurogenesis by Alcohol Consumption in Adolescent Nonhuman Primates

    Michael A. Taffe;Roxanne W. Kotzebue;Rebecca D. Crean;Elena F. Crawford

  • Ascl1 defines sequentially generated lineage-restricted neuronal and oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the spinal cord.

    James Battiste;Amy W. Helms;Euiseok J. Kim;Trisha K. Savage

  • Exposure to Repetitive Versus Varied Stress during Prenatal Development Generates Two Distinct Anxiogenic and Neuroendocrine Profiles in Adulthood

    Heather N. Richardson;Eric P. Zorrilla;Chitra D. Mandyam;Catherine L. Rivier

  • Methamphetamine self-administration and voluntary exercise have opposing effects on medial prefrontal cortex gliogenesis

    Chitra D. Mandyam;Sunmee Wee;Amelia J. Eisch;Heather N. Richardson

  • α1-Noradrenergic System Role in Increased Motivation for Cocaine Intake in Rats with Prolonged Access

    Sunmee Wee;Chitra D. Mandyam;Dusan M. Lekic;George F. Koob

  • The addicted brain craves new neurons: putative role for adult-born progenitors in promoting recovery

    Chitra D. Mandyam;George F. Koob

  • Varied access to intravenous methamphetamine self-administration differentially alters adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

    Chitra D. Mandyam;Sunmee Wee;Elena F. Crawford;Amelia J. Eisch

  • Chronic morphine induces premature mitosis of proliferating cells in the adult mouse subgranular zone

    Chitra D. Mandyam;Rebekah D. Norris;Amelia J. Eisch

  • Levels of Neural Progenitors in the Hippocampus Predict Memory Impairment and Relapse to Drug Seeking as a Function of Excessive Methamphetamine Self-Administration

    Patrick Recinto;Anjali Rose H Samant;Gustavo Chavez;Airee Kim

  • Time course of morphine's effects on adult hippocampal subgranular zone reveals preferential inhibition of cells in S phase of the cell cycle and a subpopulation of immature neurons

    Amy A. Arguello;Gwyndolen C. Harburg;Joshua R. Schonborn;Chitra D. Mandyam

  • Stress experienced in utero reduces sexual dichotomies in neurogenesis, microenvironment, and cell death in the adult rat hippocampus

    Chitra D. Mandyam;Elena F. Crawford;Amelia J. Eisch;Catherine L. Rivier

  • Adult neurogenesis: can analysis of cell cycle proteins move us "Beyond BrdU"?

    Amelia J. Eisch;Chitra D. Mandyam

  • Permanent impairment of birth and survival of cortical and hippocampal proliferating cells following excessive drinking during alcohol dependence

    Heather N. Richardson;Stephanie H. Chan;Elena F. Crawford;Youn Kyung Lee

  • Orphanin FQ/Nociceptin-Mediated Desensitization of Opioid Receptor-Like 1 Receptor and μ Opioid Receptors Involves Protein Kinase C: A Molecular Mechanism for Heterologous Cross-Talk

    Chitra D. Mandyam;Deepak R. Thakker;Jennifer L. Christensen;Kelly M. Standifer

  • Structural reorganization of pyramidal neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex of alcohol dependent rats is associated with altered glial plasticity

    Airee Kim;Eva R. Zamora-Martinez;Scott Edwards;Chitra D. Mandyam;Chitra D. Mandyam

  • Drug dependence and addiction, II: Adult neurogenesis and drug abuse.

    Amelia J. Eisch;Chitra D. Mandyam

Frequent Co-Authors

George F. Koob
George F. Koob National Institute on Drug Abuse
Hemal H. Patel
Hemal H. Patel University of California, San Diego
Amelia J. Eisch
Amelia J. Eisch University of Pennsylvania
David M. Roth
David M. Roth University of California San Diego
Olivier George
Olivier George University of California, San Diego
Scott Edwards
Scott Edwards Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
Marisa Roberto
Marisa Roberto Scripps Research Institute
Victoria B. Risbrough
Victoria B. Risbrough University of California, San Diego
Diane C. Lagace
Diane C. Lagace University of Ottawa
Catherine Rivier
Catherine Rivier Salk Institute for Biological Studies

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to numerous online degrees and career pathways in the field of behavioral health, psychology, and social work. Many students pivot to roles such as mental health counselor, social worker, or behavioral analyst, where understanding neuroscience principles is a strong foundation.

If you’re interested in clinical support and advocacy, consider pursuing accredited and affordable Master of Social Work programs. These cheapest msw programs combine flexibility with quality, making advanced study more accessible. Alternatively, for those looking to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, online bcba accredited programs online offer specialized credentials sought after across education and healthcare sectors.

Time is also a considerable factor. Fast-track opportunities, such as an accelerated social work degree or accelerated psychology programs online, allow driven students to enter their chosen fields sooner—without sacrificing rigor or quality. These career pathways blend neuroscience with real-world impact, positioning graduates for versatile and rewarding roles.

Best Scientists Citing Chitra D. Mandyam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles