World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Diane C. Lagace

Diane C. Lagace

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7738 7140 456 416 79 19790

Diane C. Lagace publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diane C. Lagace between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diane C. Lagace published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2016. 2 of the 81 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2016. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
2003 2025

81 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diane C. Lagace: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 4
2005 1
2006 1
2007 5
2008 3
2009 3
2010 6
2011 3
2012 5
2013 3
2014 4
2015 4
2016 11
2017 5
2018 5
2019 2
2020 2
2021 4
2022 4
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 81
Download as CSV

Diane C. Lagace publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane C. Lagace sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 79 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 79
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Diane C. Lagace D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane C. Lagace sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Diane C. Lagace is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and molecular biology, with significant contributions to understanding brain development, neurogenesis, and neuroplasticity mechanisms.

The main fields of study for Diane C. Lagace include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these areas, their work focuses on several subfields:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Neurology
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Surgery

The topics frequently addressed in Diane C. Lagace's research reflect a broad engagement with brain function and pathology:

  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research

Selected recent publications demonstrate the scope and impact of their research:

  • "Neonatal hyperoxia in mice triggers long-term cognitive deficits via impairments in cerebrovascular function and neurogenesis" (2022), Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • "Metformin promotes CNS remyelination and improves social interaction following focal demyelination through CBP Ser436 phosphorylation" (2020), Experimental Neurology
  • "Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus RNAseq Analysis of Adult Neurogenesis" (2022), Cells
  • "The Emergence of Stereotyped Kinematic Synergies when Mice Reach to Grasp Following Stroke" (2021), Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • "Developmental and Interventional Plasticity of Motor Maps after Perinatal Stroke" (2021), Journal of Neuroscience

Diane C. Lagace has published articles in a variety of venues, reflecting interdisciplinary collaboration and cross-field relevance:

  • Experimental Neurology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Cells
  • Methods in molecular biology

The scientist collaborates frequently with colleagues including:

  • Alena Kalinina
  • Yingben Xue
  • Ruth S. Slack
  • Baptiste Lacoste
  • Ayden Gouveia

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Molecular Adaptations Underlying Susceptibility and Resistance to Social Defeat in Brain Reward Regions

    Vaishnav Krishnan;Ming Hu Han;Danielle L. Graham;Olivier Berton

  • Mitochondrial Dynamics Impacts Stem Cell Identity and Fate Decisions by Regulating a Nuclear Transcriptional Program

    Mireille Khacho;Alysen Clark;Devon S. Svoboda;Joelle Azzi

  • Dynamic contribution of nestin-expressing stem cells to adult neurogenesis.

    Diane C. Lagace;Mary C. Whitman;Michele A. Noonan;Jessica L. Ables

  • Neurod1 is essential for the survival and maturation of adult-born neurons.

    Zhengliang Gao;Kerstin Ure;Jessica L. Ables;Diane C. Lagace

  • Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is functionally important for stress-induced social avoidance

    Diane C. Lagace;Michael H. Donovan;Nathan A. DeCarolis;Laure A. Farnbauch

  • The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders: Are we mistaking the scaffolding for the building?

    David Petrik;Diane C. Lagace;Amelia J. Eisch

  • Ascl1 defines sequentially generated lineage-restricted neuronal and oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the spinal cord.

    James Battiste;Amy W. Helms;Euiseok J. Kim;Trisha K. Savage

  • Mitochondrial dysfunction underlies cognitive defects as a result of neural stem cell depletion and impaired neurogenesis.

    Mireille Khacho;Alysen Clark;Devon S. Svoboda;Jason G. MacLaurin

  • Gender and endogenous levels of estradiol do not influence adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice.

    Diane C. Lagace;Stephanie J. Fischer;Amelia J. Eisch

  • Autophagy supports genomic stability by degrading retrotransposon RNA

    Huishan Guo;Maneka Chitiprolu;David Gagnon;Lingrui Meng

  • Focal cerebral ischemia induces a multilineage cytogenic response from adult subventricular zone that is predominantly gliogenic.

    Lu Li;Kate M. Harms;P. Britten Ventura;Diane C. Lagace

  • Cdk5 is essential for adult hippocampal neurogenesis

    Diane C. Lagace;David R. Benavides;Janice W. Kansy;Marina Mapelli

  • Making a neuron: Cdk5 in embryonic and adult neurogenesis.

    Sebastian Jessberger;Fred H. Gage;Amelia J. Eisch;Diane C. Lagace

  • In vivo contribution of nestin- and GLAST-lineage cells to adult hippocampal neurogenesis

    Nathan A. DeCarolis;Maxwell Mechanic;David Petrik;Adam Carlton

  • Conditional Disruption of Calpain in the CNS Alters Dendrite Morphology, Impairs LTP, and Promotes Neuronal Survival following Injury

    Mandana Amini;Chun Lei Ma;Rasoul Farazifard;Guoqi Zhu

  • Cell-autonomous inactivation of the reelin pathway impairs adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus.

    Catia M. Teixeira;Michelle M. Kron;Nuria Masachs;Helen Zhang

  • Chronic Stress Induces Anxiety via an Amygdalar Intracellular Cascade that Impairs Endocannabinoid Signaling

    Zhaohong Qin;Xun Zhou;Nihar R. Pandey;Haley A. Vecchiarelli

  • Juvenile Administration of Methylphenidate Attenuates Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis

    Diane C. Lagace;Jessica K. Yee;Carlos A. Bolaños;Amelia J. Eisch

  • Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase Activity by Valproic Acid Blocks Adipogenesis*

    Unknown

  • Progressive dopaminergic cell loss with unilateral-to-bilateral progression in a genetic model of Parkinson disease.

    Maxime W. C. Rousseaux;Paul C. Marcogliese;Dianbo Qu;Sarah J. Hewitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Amelia J. Eisch
Amelia J. Eisch University of Pennsylvania
David S. Park
David S. Park New York University
Ruth S. Slack
Ruth S. Slack University of Ottawa
Paul R. Albert
Paul R. Albert Ottawa Hospital
Eric J. Nestler
Eric J. Nestler Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Vaishnav Krishnan
Vaishnav Krishnan Baylor College of Medicine
Atanas G. Atanasov
Atanas G. Atanasov Medical University of Vienna
Philippe Pierre
Philippe Pierre Aix-Marseille University
Olivier Berton
Olivier Berton University of Pennsylvania
Tiago F. Outeiro
Tiago F. Outeiro University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to many related fields, many of which offer flexible online degree options. For those interested in the social implications of brain science, a social work accelerated program can help you develop skills to support individuals and communities facing mental health challenges.

Another strong option is pursuing an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology, which provides a solid foundation in behavioral science and can be completed in less time than traditional programs.

If your goals include providing mental health or guidance services, you might consider either the cheapest online counseling degree for those seeking CACREP-accredited programs, or explore the most affordable online counseling degrees to minimize costs.

Whether you are drawn to research, clinical work, or community support, these online pathways related to neuroscience offer flexible, reputable, and often accelerated routes into fulfilling careers.

Best Scientists Citing Diane C. Lagace

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles