World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
61
Citations
11401
World Ranking
2224
National Ranking
799

Maureen L. Stanton publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen L. Stanton sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 106 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Maureen L. Stanton D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen L. Stanton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Maureen L. Stanton is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their academic work includes publications in literary and cultural review journals, contributing notably in recent years.

Their recent published papers include the following:

  • The Murmur of Everything Moving, 2023, published in The Sewanee Review
  • The Birds, 2024, published in The Missouri Review

Maureen L. Stanton's publication record includes contributions to the following venues:

  • The Sewanee Review
  • The Missouri Review

There are no frequent co-authors associated with their recent publications.

Stanton has received recognition through awards including:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2012
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2011

Best Publications

  • Seed variation in wild radish: effect of seed size on components of seedling and adult fitness

    Maureen L. Stanton

  • Floral evolution: Attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness

    Maureen L. Stanton;Allison A. Snow;Steven N. Handel

  • INFLUENCES OF FLORAL VARIATION ON POLLEN REMOVAL AND SEED PRODUCTION IN WILD RADISH

    Helen J. Young;Maureen L. Stanton

  • Breakdown of an ant-plant mutualism follows the loss of large herbivores from an African savanna.

    Todd M. Palmer;Maureen L. Stanton;Truman P. Young;Jacob R. Goheen

  • Interacting Guilds: Moving beyond the Pairwise Perspective on Mutualisms

    Maureen L. Stanton

  • Invasibility of experimental habitat Islands in a California winter annual grassland

    George R. Robinson;George R. Robinson;James F. Quinn;Maureen L. Stanton

  • Synergy of multiple partners, including freeloaders, increases host fitness in a multispecies mutualism.

    Todd M. Palmer;Daniel F. Doak;Maureen L. Stanton;Judith L. Bronstein

  • Evolution in stressful environments. I. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses.

    Maureen Stanton;B. A. Roy;D. A. Thiede

  • Competition and Coexistence: Exploring Mechanisms That Restrict and Maintain Diversity within Mutualist Guilds

    Todd M. Palmer;Maureen L. Stanton;Truman P. Young

  • BUMBLE BEE POLLINATION AND FLORAL MORPHOLOGY: FACTORS INFLUENCING POLLEN DISPERSAL IN THE ALPINE SKY PILOT, POLEMONIUM VISCOSUM (POLEMONIACEAE)

    Candace Galen;Candace Galen;Maureen L. Stanton;Maureen L. Stanton

  • Seasonal Variation in Pollination Dynamics of Sexually Dimorphic Sidalcea Oregana SSP. Spicata (Malvaceae)

    Tia-Lynn Ashman;Maureen Stanton

  • BEYOND FLORAL BATEMANIA: GENDER BIASES IN SELECTION FOR POLLINATION SUCCESS

    Paul Wilson;James D. Thomson;Maureen L. Stanton;Lisa P. Rigney

  • Evolution in stressful environments II: adaptive value and costs of plasticity in response to low light in Sinapis arvensis.

    Thomas Steinger;B. A. Roy;B. A. Roy;Maureen Stanton

  • RESPONSES OF SNOWBED PLANT SPECIES TO CHANGES IN GROWING-SEASON LENGTH'

    Candace Galen;Maureen L. Stanton

  • Sexual dimorphism in flower size

    Lynda F. Delph;Laura F. Galloway;Maureen L. Stanton

  • ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES AND PHENOTYPIC CORRELATES OF PETAL SIZE VARIATION IN WILD RADISH, RAPHANUS SATIVUS (BRASSICACEAE)

    Maureen L. Stanton;Robert E. Preston

  • Influence of Environmental Quality on Pollen Competitive Ability in Wild Radish

    Helen J. Young;Maureen L. Stanton

  • CONSEQUENCES OF EMERGENCE PHENOLOGY FOR REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN RANUNCULUS ADONEUS (RANUNCULACEAE)

    Candace Galen;Maureen L. Stanton

  • REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF PETAL COLOR VARIANTS IN WILD POPULATIONS OF RAPHANUS SATIVUS: I. POLLINATOR RESPONSE TO COLOR MORPHS

    Maureen L. Stanton

  • CONSEQUENCES OF FLORAL VARIATION FOR MALE AND FEMALE REPRODUCTION IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF WILD RADISH, RAPHANUS SATIVUS L.

    Maureen Stanton;Helen J. Young;Norman C. Ellstrand;Janet M. Clegg

Frequent Co-Authors

Todd M. Palmer
Todd M. Palmer University of Florida
Candace Galen
Candace Galen University of Missouri
Truman P. Young
Truman P. Young University of California, Davis
Jacob R. Goheen
Jacob R. Goheen University of Wyoming
Allison A. Snow
Allison A. Snow The Ohio State University
Robert M. Pringle
Robert M. Pringle Princeton University
Kevin J. Rice
Kevin J. Rice University of California, Davis
Laura F. Galloway
Laura F. Galloway University of Virginia
Richard K. Grosberg
Richard K. Grosberg University of California, Davis
Susan J. Mazer
Susan J. Mazer University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution can lead to a variety of related fields. Many students explore online interdisciplinary studies degree ranking affordable programs to gain a broad scientific foundation. These flexible degrees allow students to combine ecology, environmental science, and even social science topics, opening up diverse career opportunities.

For those looking to specialize further, master’s programs may offer a fast track. The quickest cheapest masters degree can provide options that are cost-effective and time-efficient, while still delivering valuable credentials.

Other career paths related to ecology include library science and information management. The average cost of MLIS degree US is a key consideration for those interested in managing scientific resources or datasets in research environments.

Additionally, options such as speech-language pathology may appeal to students interested in animal communication or bioacoustics. It’s important to check that programs meet necessary standards; for example, explore asha certified slp programs for accredited pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Maureen L. Stanton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles