World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
8428
World Ranking
5035
National Ranking
1724

Jacob R. Goheen publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob R. Goheen sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 120 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jacob R. Goheen D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob R. Goheen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacob R. Goheen is affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States. Their research focuses broadly on ecology and related subfields, with particular attention to wildlife ecology, animal studies, and ecological modeling.

The primary topics covered in Goheen's work include:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Their publications span a range of ecological and conservation-focused venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Ecological Applications
  • Ecology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Goheen has contributed to a number of recent papers, including:

  • Impacts of large herbivores on terrestrial ecosystems (2023), published in Current Biology
  • Causes, Consequences, and Conservation of Ungulate Migration (2021), published in Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
  • Effects of body size on estimation of mammalian area requirements (2020), published in Conservation Biology
  • Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns (2023), published in Science
  • Disruption of an ant-plant mutualism shapes interactions between lions and their primary prey (2024), published in Science

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Keith Geluso
  • S. K. Morgan Ernest
  • Glenda M. Yenni
  • Ginger Allington
  • Ellen K. Bledsoe

Their work engages multiple subfields of ecological research, notably:

  • Ecology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecological Modeling

Best Publications

  • Moving in the Anthropocene : global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements

    Marlee A. Tucker;Katrin Böhning-Gaese;William F. Fagan;John M. Fryxell

  • Skin shedding and tissue regeneration in African spiny mice ( Acomys )

    Ashley W. Seifert;Ashley W. Seifert;Stephen G. Kiama;Megan G. Seifert;Jacob R. Goheen

  • Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness

    Lauchlan H. Fraser;Jason Pither;Anke Jentsch;Marcelo Sternberg

  • Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals

    Brett R. Jesmer;Jerod A. Merkle;Jacob R. Goheen;Ellen O. Aikens

  • Breakdown of an ant-plant mutualism follows the loss of large herbivores from an African savanna.

    Todd M. Palmer;Maureen L. Stanton;Truman P. Young;Jacob R. Goheen

  • Synergy of multiple partners, including freeloaders, increases host fitness in a multispecies mutualism.

    Todd M. Palmer;Daniel F. Doak;Maureen L. Stanton;Judith L. Bronstein

  • Change in dominance determines herbivore effects on plant biodiversity

    Sally E. Koerner;Melinda D. Smith;Deron E. Burkepile;Niall P. Hanan

  • Large carnivores make savanna tree communities less thorny

    Adam T. Ford;Jacob R. Goheen;Tobias O. Otieno;Laura Bidner

  • A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation

    Michael J. Noonan;Michael J. Noonan;Marlee A. Tucker;Christen H. Fleming;Christen H. Fleming;Thomas S. Akre

  • Impacts of large herbivores on terrestrial ecosystems

    Unknown

  • Large herbivores facilitate savanna tree establishment via diverse and indirect pathways

    Jacob R. Goheen;Todd M. Palmer;Felicia Keesing;Corinna Riginos

  • NET EFFECTS OF LARGE MAMMALS ON ACACIA SEEDLING SURVIVAL IN AN AFRICAN SAVANNA

    Jacob R. Goheen;Felicia Keesing;Brian F. Allan;Darcy Ogada

  • Defensive Plant-Ants Stabilize Megaherbivore-Driven Landscape Change in an African Savanna

    Jacob R. Goheen;Jacob R. Goheen;Todd M. Palmer

  • Trophic Cascades by Large Carnivores: A Case for Strong Inference and Mechanism.

    Adam T. Ford;Jacob R. Goheen

  • Zero-sum, the niche,and metacommunities: long-term dynamics of community assembly

    S. K. Morgan Ernest;James H. Brown;Katherine M. Thibault;Ethan P. White

  • Effects of mammalian herbivore declines on plant communities: observations and experiments in an African savanna

    Hillary S. Young;Douglas J. McCauley;Kristofer M. Helgen;Jacob R. Goheen

  • Long-term insights into the influence of precipitation on community dynamics in desert rodents

    Katherine M. Thibault;Katherine M. Thibault;S. K. Morgan Ernest;Ethan P. White;James H. Brown

  • Piecewise Disassembly of a Large-Herbivore Community across a Rainfall Gradient: The UHURU Experiment

    Jacob R. Goheen;Todd M. Palmer;Grace K. Charles;Kristofer M. Helgen

  • Consequences of herbivory by native ungulates for the reproduction of a savanna tree

    Jacob R. Goheen;Truman P. Young;Felicia Keesing;Todd M. Palmer

  • Causes, Consequences, and Conservation of Ungulate Migration

    Matthew J. Kauffman;Ellen O. Aikens;Ellen O. Aikens;Saeideh Esmaeili;Saeideh Esmaeili;Petra Kaczensky

  • Forces structuring tree squirrel communities in landscapes fragmented by agriculture: species differences in perceptions of forest connectivity and carrying capacity

    Jacob R. Goheen;Robert K. Swihart;Thomas M. Gehring;Michael S. Miller

  • NET EFFECTS OF LARGE MAMMALS ON ACACIA SEEDLING SURVIVAL

    Jacob R. Goheen;Felicia Keesing;Brian E Allan;Darcy Ogada

Frequent Co-Authors

Todd M. Palmer
Todd M. Palmer University of Florida
Robert M. Pringle
Robert M. Pringle Princeton University
Adam T. Ford
Adam T. Ford University of British Columbia
Truman P. Young
Truman P. Young University of California, Davis
Matthew J. Kauffman
Matthew J. Kauffman University of Wyoming
Corinna Riginos
Corinna Riginos University of Wyoming
Robert K. Swihart
Robert K. Swihart Purdue University West Lafayette
Mahesh Sankaran
Mahesh Sankaran University of Leeds
Lauchlan H. Fraser
Lauchlan H. Fraser Thompson Rivers University
James F. Cahill
James F. Cahill University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many choose interdisciplinary routes, blending environmental science with healthcare or education, to increase their career prospects.

Nursing remains a popular option for those passionate about science, sustainability, and human health. Programs like rn to bsn online allow registered nurses to earn their bachelor’s degree efficiently while gaining a better understanding of health impacts within ecosystems. For those aiming higher roles, rn to np programs offer bridge pathways from associate to master’s degrees in nursing, making it easier to transition into leadership or specialized roles.

Non-nurses drawn to healthcare can consider an online direct entry msn, which enables individuals with unrelated bachelor’s degrees to enter the nursing field. When choosing online programs, it’s crucial to research quality and accreditation. Students should compare top rated online nursing schools wgu and similar institutions to find the best fit.

Exploring online degrees—whether in nursing, science, or education—can provide the flexibility and specialized knowledge needed to thrive in evolving fields connected to ecology and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Jacob R. Goheen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles