World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Russia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
46
Citations
6547
World Ranking
425
National Ranking
2

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
52
Citations
8343
World Ranking
3705
National Ranking
2

Roman Fediuk publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roman Fediuk sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 252 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Roman Fediuk D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roman Fediuk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Russia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Roman Fediuk is affiliated with the Far Eastern Federal University in the Russian Federation. Their research primarily spans the field of engineering, with a focus on civil and structural engineering, building and construction, and materials chemistry. Additional work includes subfields such as mechanical engineering and biomedical engineering.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Innovative Concrete Reinforcement Materials
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Recycling and Utilization of Industrial and Municipal Waste in Materials Production
  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Structural Mechanics and Materials
  • Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

Their recent notable publications include:

  • Long-term durability properties of geopolymer concrete: An in-depth review, 2021, Case Studies in Construction Materials
  • Slag uses in making an ecofriendly and sustainable concrete: A review, 2020, Construction and Building Materials
  • Fiber-reinforced alkali-activated concrete: A review, 2021, Journal of Building Engineering
  • Rice Husk Ash-Based Concrete Composites: A Critical Review of Their Properties and Applications, 2021, Crystals
  • Natural Fibers as an Alternative to Synthetic Fibers in Reinforcement of Geopolymer Matrices: A Comparative Review, 2021, Polymers

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Roman Fediuk include:

  • Mugahed Amran
  • Nikolai Vatin
  • G. Murali
  • Sergey Klyuev
  • Afonso Rangel Garcez de Azevedo

The scientist publishes mostly in the following venues:

  • Materials
  • Construction and Building Materials
  • Case Studies in Construction Materials
  • Crystals
  • Sustainability

Roman Fediuk has contributed extensively to the body of knowledge in concrete and construction materials, with a research output reflecting a consistent focus on sustainable materials and innovative reinforcement techniques.

Best Publications

  • Slag uses in making an ecofriendly and sustainable concrete: A review

    Mugahed Amran;G. Murali;Nur Hafizah A. Khalid;Roman Fediuk

  • Self-Healing Concrete as a Prospective Construction Material: A Review

    Unknown

  • Fiber-reinforced alkali-activated concrete: A review

    Mugahed Amran;Roman Fediuk;Hakim S. Abdelgader;G. Murali

  • Rice Husk Ash-Based Concrete Composites: A Critical Review of Their Properties and Applications

    Mugahed Amran;Roman Fediuk;Gunasekaran Murali;Nikolai Vatin

  • Long-term durability properties of geopolymer concrete: An in-depth review

    Mugahed Amran;Amin Al-Fakih;S.H. Chu;Roman Fediuk

  • Natural Fibers as an Alternative to Synthetic Fibers in Reinforcement of Geopolymer Matrices: A Comparative Review.

    Afonso R. G. de Azevedo;Ariana S. A. Cruz;Markssuel T. Marvila;Leandro B. de Oliveira

  • Application of Plastic Wastes in Construction Materials: A Review Using the Concept of Life-Cycle Assessment in the Context of Recent Research for Future Perspectives.

    Tulane Rodrigues da Silva;Afonso Rangel Garcez de Azevedo;Daiane Cecchin;Markssuel Teixeira Marvila

  • Fly Ash-Based Eco-Efficient Concretes: A Comprehensive Review of the Short-Term Properties

    Mugahed Amran;Roman Fediuk;Gunasekaran Murali;Siva Avudaiappan

  • Fibre-Reinforced Foamed Concretes: A Review.

    Mugahed Amran;Roman Fediuk;Nikolai Vatin;Yeong Huei Lee

  • Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregates in Production of Green Cement-Based Concrete Composites: A Review

    Natt Makul;Roman Fediuk;Mugahed Amran;Abdullah M. Zeyad

  • Acoustic Properties of Innovative Concretes: A Review.

    Roman Fediuk;Mugahed Amran;Nikolai Vatin;Yuriy Vasilev

  • Experimental research on impact response of novel steel fibrous concretes under falling mass impact

    T. Abirami;M. Loganaganandan;G. Murali;Roman Fediuk

  • Palm Oil Fuel Ash-Based Eco-Efficient Concrete: A Critical Review of the Short-Term Properties.

    Mugahed Amran;Gunasekaran Murali;Roman Fediuk;Nikolai Vatin

  • Mechanical Activation of Construction Binder Materials by Various Mills

    R S Fediuk

  • Design Strategy for Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Review of Status and Future Perspectives

    Natt Makul;Roman Fediuk;Mugahed Amran;Abdullah M. Zeyad

  • Global carbon recoverability experiences from the cement industry

    Unknown

  • A Critical Review on the Properties and Applications of Sulfur-Based Concrete.

    Roman Fediuk;Y. H. Mugahed Amran;Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah;Aamar Danish

  • Impact response of two-layered grouted aggregate fibrous concrete composite under falling mass impact

    M.K. Haridharan;S. Matheswaran;G. Murali;Sallal R. Abid

  • Use of geonics scientific positions for designing of building composites for protective (fortification) structures

    R S Fediuk;Yu G Yevdokimova;A K Smoliakov;N Yu Stoyushko

  • Experimental Tests and Reliability Analysis of the Cracking Impact Resistance of UHPFRC

    Hussain A. Jabir;Sallal R. Abid;Gunasekaran Murali;Sajjad H. Ali

  • Improving the early strength of concrete: Effect of mechanochemical activation of the cementitious suspension and using of various superplasticizers

    Ruslan Ibragimov;Roman Fediuk

  • Reusing marble and granite dust as cement replacement in cementitious composites: A review on sustainability benefits and critical challenges

    Aamar Danish;Aamar Danish;Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah;Muhammad Usama Salim;Muhammad Usama Salim;Roman Fediuk

  • High-strength fibrous concrete of Russian Far East natural materials

    R Fediuk

  • Composite binders for concrete with reduced permeability

    R Fediuk;A Yushin

  • Investigation of the Potential Use of Curauá Fiber for Reinforcing Mortars

    Afonso R. G. de Azevedo;Sergey Klyuev;Markssuel T. Marvila;Nikolai Vatin

  • Impact performance of novel multi-layered prepacked aggregate fibrous composites under compression and bending

    G. Murali;Sallal R. Abid;Y.H. Mugahed Amran;Hakim S. Abdelgader;Hakim S. Abdelgader

Frequent Co-Authors

Togay Ozbakkaloglu
Togay Ozbakkaloglu Texas State University
Doo-Yeol Yoo
Doo-Yeol Yoo Yonsei University
Sergio Neves Monteiro
Sergio Neves Monteiro Military Institute of Engineering
Aliakbar Gholampour
Aliakbar Gholampour Flinders University
Raj Das
Raj Das RMIT University
Wesam Salah Alaloul
Wesam Salah Alaloul Universiti Teknologi Petronas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA opens up many related academic and career opportunities. Today, a wide range of 6 week certification programs online allow students to quickly build technical skills or add industry credentials from the comfort of home. These short, intensive courses can be an excellent stepping stone to more advanced degrees or new career fields.

For those interested in blending technical and business skills, pursuing an online finance degree program or one of the top accelerated mba programs usa can be a strategic move. These programs are designed for motivated learners who want to advance their careers quickly while maintaining flexibility.

Technical professionals and recent graduates might also explore the accelerated paralegal program options available online. These fast-track programs provide essential legal knowledge to expand your career into areas like patent law or technology compliance. The landscape of online education is dynamic, offering diverse pathways suitable for busy students aiming to stay ahead in a competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Roman Fediuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles