World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 89 1807 1739 549 512 309 25193
Engineering and Technology 90 274 261 95 89 333 25498

Togay Ozbakkaloglu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Togay Ozbakkaloglu between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Togay Ozbakkaloglu published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 16.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2022. 43 of the 361 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2022. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 50 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 15 publications
2004 2025

361 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Togay Ozbakkaloglu: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 8
2008 8
2009 6
2010 1
2011 1
2012 2
2013 17
2014 16
2015 18
2016 20
2017 28
2018 19
2019 16
2020 34
2021 36
2022 50
2023 29
2024 28
2025 15
Total 361
Download as CSV

Togay Ozbakkaloglu publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Togay Ozbakkaloglu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 328–337 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 333 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159 333
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Togay Ozbakkaloglu D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Togay Ozbakkaloglu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23 90
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Togay Ozbakkaloglu is affiliated with Texas State University in the United States and specializes in engineering, with a strong focus on civil and structural engineering. Their research contributions extend notably in building and construction, mechanical engineering, materials chemistry, and polymers and plastics, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to engineering challenges.

The scientist's work revolves around several main topics, including concrete and cement materials research, innovative concrete reinforcement materials, structural behavior of reinforced concrete, recycled aggregate concrete performance, recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production, magnesium oxide properties and applications, and innovations in concrete and construction materials.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Togay Ozbakkaloglu include Osman Gençel, Aliakbar Gholampour, Mehrab Nodehi, Aamar Danish, and Ahmet Sarı. This indicates a diverse and active research network within the field.

Their publications are predominantly featured in key journals such as Construction and Building Materials, Journal of Building Engineering, Materials, Sustainability, and Journal of Cleaner Production. These venues align with their areas of study and research interests.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Togay Ozbakkaloglu include:

  • Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: A critical review of the long-term durability properties (2020, Construction and Building Materials)
  • Recent trends in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC): Current status, challenges, and future prospects (2022, Construction and Building Materials)
  • Lignocellulosic fiber reinforced composites: Progress, performance, properties, applications, and future perspectives (2021, Polymer Composites)
  • Slag uses in making an ecofriendly and sustainable concrete: A review (2020, Construction and Building Materials)
  • Fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag-based alkali-activated concrete: Mechanical, transport and microstructural properties (2020, Construction and Building Materials)

The emphasis on eco-friendly and sustainable construction materials is noticeable, particularly regarding the use of industrial by-products like fly ash and slag in concrete formulations. The exploration of fiber-reinforced composites also highlights a focus on improving the performance and durability of construction materials.

Best Publications

  • Mechanical and durability properties of high-strength concrete containing steel and polypropylene fibers

    Vahid Afroughsabet;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Use of recycled plastics in concrete: A critical review.

    Lei Gu;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress-strain models

    Togay Ozbakkaloglu;Jian C. Lim;Thomas Vincent

  • High-performance fiber-reinforced concrete: a review

    Vahid Afroughsabet;Luigi Biolzi;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete: Experimental test database and a new design-oriented model

    Togay Ozbakkaloglu;Jian C. Lim

  • Lignocellulosic fiber reinforced composites: Progress, performance, properties, applications, and future perspectives

    Sanjay Mavinkere Rangappa;Suchart Siengchin;Jyotishkumar Parameswaranpillai;Mohammad Jawaid

  • New formulations for mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete using gene expression programming

    Aliakbar Gholampour;Amair H. Gandomi;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Behavior of low-calcium fly and bottom ash-based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature

    Tianyu Xie;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Behavior of FRP-Confined Normal- and High-Strength Concrete under Cyclic Axial Compression

    Togay Ozbakkaloglu;Emre Akin

  • Influence of concrete strength and confinement method on axial compressive behavior of FRP confined high- and ultra high-strength concrete

    Thomas Vincent;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Mechanical and Durability Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete: Effect of Recycled Aggregate Properties and Content

    Togay Ozbakkaloglu;Aliakbar Gholampour;Tianyu Xie

  • Influence of double hooked-end steel fibers and slag on mechanical and durability properties of high performance recycled aggregate concrete

    Vahid Afroughsabet;Luigi Biolzi;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Stress–strain model for normal- and light-weight concretes under uniaxial and triaxial compression

    Jian C. Lim;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Influence of fiber orientation and specimen end condition on axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete

    Thomas Vincent;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Compressive behavior of concrete-filled FRP tube columns: Assessment of critical column parameters

    Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Confinement Model for FRP-Confined High-Strength Concrete

    Jian C. Lim;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • From Graphene Oxide to Reduced Graphene Oxide: Impact on the Physiochemical and Mechanical Properties of Graphene–Cement Composites

    Aliakbar Gholampour;Meisam Valizadeh Kiamahalleh;Diana N. H. Tran;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Synthetic fibers for cementitious composites: A critical and in-depth review of recent advances

    Hamid Reza Pakravan;Togay Ozbakkaloglu

  • Axial Compressive Behavior of Circular High-Strength Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes

    Togay Ozbakkaloglu;Thomas Vincent

Frequent Co-Authors

Aliakbar Gholampour
Aliakbar Gholampour Flinders University
Murat Saatcioglu
Murat Saatcioglu University of Ottawa
Dusan Losic
Dusan Losic University of Adelaide
Osman Gencel
Osman Gencel Bartin University
Deric J. Oehlers
Deric J. Oehlers University of Adelaide
Rudolf Seracino
Rudolf Seracino North Carolina State University
Michael C. Griffith
Michael C. Griffith University of Adelaide
Ching-Tai Ng
Ching-Tai Ng University of Adelaide
Behrooz Keshtegar
Behrooz Keshtegar Zabol University
Jian-Guo Dai
Jian-Guo Dai City University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology students interested in expanding their qualifications can explore a variety of online learning options. For those passionate about the intersection of sports and technology, pursuing sports degrees online can open doors to management, analytics, and operational roles in the sports industry.

If urban infrastructure and innovation pique your interest, consider the advantages of an online degree urban planning program. These flexible courses can help prepare you for in-demand careers in urban development and smart cities—a growing sector for tech-minded professionals.

Many professionals seek to accelerate their career growth with programs like a 6-month master's degree online. Earning a master’s in a short timeframe allows you to quickly advance your skills and qualify for higher-level positions in engineering, IT, project management, and more.

For career changers or those looking to specialize, choosing from top certification programs can provide a fast-track into rewarding technical and engineering roles. These certifications often require less time than a traditional degree and focus on the practical skills employers want most.

Best Scientists Citing Togay Ozbakkaloglu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles