World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 33 9413 9053 461 453 86 4523

M.S. Mohamed Ali publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M.S. Mohamed Ali between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M.S. Mohamed Ali published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2011. 5 of the 94 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2011. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1998 2025

94 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M.S. Mohamed Ali: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 3
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 7
2009 4
2010 6
2011 8
2012 4
2013 3
2014 4
2015 5
2016 2
2017 6
2018 8
2019 4
2020 3
2021 5
2022 2
2023 3
2024 2
2025 3
Total 94
Download as CSV

M.S. Mohamed Ali publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.S. Mohamed Ali sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190 86
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

M.S. Mohamed Ali D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.S. Mohamed Ali sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189 33
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

M.S. Mohamed Ali is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and specializes in engineering, with a particular focus on civil and structural engineering. Their research spans a variety of subfields including building and construction, materials chemistry, and ceramics and composites.

Their research topics include:

  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Concrete and cement materials research
  • Structural behavior of reinforced concrete
  • Structural load-bearing analysis
  • Concrete properties and behavior
  • Magnesium oxide properties and applications
  • Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

M.S. Mohamed Ali has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Construction and Building Materials
  • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
  • Journal of Building Engineering
  • Engineering Structures
  • Composite Structures

Some recent publications by M.S. Mohamed Ali include:

  • "The influence of steel fibre properties on the shrinkage of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete," 2020, published in Construction and Building Materials
  • "Development of ECO-UHPC with very-low-C3A cement and ground granulated blast-furnace slag," 2021, published in Construction and Building Materials
  • "ECO-UHPC with High-Volume Class-F Fly Ash: New Insight into Mechanical and Durability Properties," 2021, published in Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
  • "Experimental and numerical investigations on concrete filled carbon FRP tube (CFRP-CFFT) columns manufactured with ultra-high-performance fibre reinforced concrete," 2020, published in Composite Structures
  • "An investigation into the feasibility of normal and fibre-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete multi-cell and composite sandwich panels," 2021, published in Journal of Building Engineering

M.S. Mohamed Ali collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Abdul Hamid Sheikh
  • Mohamed Elchalakani
  • S. Mahdi
  • Mohammad Alameri
  • Tanvir Ahmed

Best Publications

  • Local and global bond characteristics of steel reinforcing bars

    Matthew Haskett;Deric John Oehlers;M.S. Mohamed Ali

  • Bond Strength of Near-Surface Mounted FRP Strip-to-Concrete Joints

    Rudolf Seracino;Nicola M. Jones;M. S. M. Ali;Mark W. Page

  • Experimental and numerical study of the flexural behaviour of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete beams

    M. Singh;A.H. Sheikh;M.S. Mohamed Ali;P. Visintin

  • Assessing Behaviour of Fresh and Hardened Geopolymer Concrete Mixed with Class-F Fly Ash

    M. Albitar;P. Visintin;M. S. Mohamed Ali;M. Drechsler

  • Effect of granulated lead smelter slag on strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete

    M. Albitar;M.S. Mohamed Ali;P. Visintin;M. Drechsler

  • Experiments and Finite Element Analysis of GFRP Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Rectangular Columns Subjected to Concentric and Eccentric Axial Loading

    Mohamed Elchalakani;Ali Karrech;Minhao Dong;M.S. Mohamed Ali

  • Interfacial stress transfer of near surface-mounted FRP-to-concrete joints

    M.S. Mohamed Ali;D.J. Oehlers;M.C. Griffith;R. Seracino

  • Manufacturing ultra-high performance concrete utilising conventional materials and production methods

    H.R. Sobuz;P. Visintin;M.S. Mohamed Ali;M. Singh

  • Rigid body moment-rotation mechanism for reinforced concrete beam hinges

    Matthew Haskett;Deric John Oehlers;M.S. Mohamed Ali;Chengqing Wu

  • Plate–concrete interfacial bond strength of FRP and metallic plated concrete specimens

    S.K. Sharma;M.S. Mohamed Ali;D. Goldar;P.K. Sikdar

  • The Tension Stiffening Mechanism in Reinforced Concrete Prisms

    Rahimah Muhamad;M.S. Mohamed Ali;Deric John Oehlers;Michael Griffith

  • A structural engineering approach to adhesive bonding longitudinal plates to RC beams and slabs

    D.J. Oehlers;S.M. Park;M.S. Mohamed Ali

  • Experimental study on fly ash and lead smelter slag-based geopolymer concrete columns

    M. Albitar;M.S. Mohamed Ali;P. Visintin

  • Evaluating the shear-friction resistance across sliding planes in concrete

    Matthew Haskett;Deric John Oehlers;M.S. Mohamed Ali;Surjit Kumar Sharma

  • Vertical shear interaction model between external FRP transverse plates and internal steel stirrups

    M.S. Mohamed Ali;D.J. Oehlers;R. Seracino

  • Shear behaviour of geopolymer concrete beams without stirrups

    P. Visintin;M.S. Mohamed Ali;M. Albitar;W. Lucas

  • Yield Penetration Hinge Rotation in Reinforced Concrete Beams

    Matthew Haskett;Deric John Oehlers;M. S. Mohamed Ali;Chengqing Wu

  • Derivation of the bond–slip characteristics for FRP plated steel members

    Ibrisam Akbar;Deric John Oehlers;M.S. Mohamed Ali

  • FRP-Reinforced Concrete Beams: Unified Approach Based on IC Theory

    Deric John Oehlers;M. S. Mohamed Ali;Matthew Haskett;Wade Lucas

  • Experimental Investigation of Rectangular Air-Cured Geopolymer Concrete Columns Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Stirrups

    M. Elchalakani;M. Dong;A. Karrech;G. Li

  • Upgrading Continuous Reinforced Concrete Beams by Gluing Steel Plates to Their Tension Faces

    D. J. Oehlers;M. S. Mohamed Ali;Weimin Luo

Frequent Co-Authors

Deric J. Oehlers
Deric J. Oehlers University of Adelaide
Phillip Visintin
Phillip Visintin University of Adelaide
Michael C. Griffith
Michael C. Griffith University of Adelaide
Abdul Hamid Sheikh
Abdul Hamid Sheikh University of Adelaide
Mohamed Elchalakani
Mohamed Elchalakani University of Western Australia
Mark A. Bradford
Mark A. Bradford University of New South Wales
Rudolf Seracino
Rudolf Seracino North Carolina State University
Chengqing Wu
Chengqing Wu University of Technology Sydney
Togay Ozbakkaloglu
Togay Ozbakkaloglu Texas State University
Allan Manalo
Allan Manalo University of Southern Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online learning options can open up flexible and affordable pathways for those interested in Engineering and Technology in the USA. For those looking to specialize, consider pursuing a masters in urban planning online. This option combines engineering concepts with urban development, and online format allows you to study at your own pace.

If you want to fast-track your career, 6 months masters degree programs offer an accelerated route to a master’s credential. These programs are ideal for motivated learners who want results quickly.

Not ready for a full degree? Upskill with one of the best certifications for jobs. Shorter certification programs can boost your employment opportunities and provide specialized knowledge relevant to engineering and technology fields.

For learners balancing work, family, and education, online courses can be particularly helpful. If you’re looking for programs that offer flexibility, browse some of the best online degrees for moms, which are tailored for busy schedules without compromising academic quality.

Best Scientists Citing M.S. Mohamed Ali

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles