World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
30491
World Ranking
2322
National Ranking
256

Neuroscience

D-Index
69
Citations
30487
World Ranking
2576
National Ranking
256

Paul W. Burgess publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Burgess sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul W. Burgess D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Burgess sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul W. Burgess is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several intersecting fields including Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology as prominent subfields. Their work engages advanced imaging techniques and clinical applications, contributing to knowledge in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Orthopedics, Sports Medicine, and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics explored in Paul W. Burgess's research include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Education and Training Studies

The scientist has published several papers recently, reflecting diverse interests and collaborations. Some of their latest work includes:

  • Quantification of inter-brain coupling: A review of current methods used in haemodynamic and electrophysiological hyperscanning studies, 2023, NeuroImage
  • Attentional, anticipatory and spatial cognition fluctuate throughout the menstrual cycle: Potential implications for female sport, 2024, Neuropsychologia
  • An Approach to Neuroimaging Interpersonal Interactions in Mental Health Interventions, 2022, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Decreased Exercise-Induced Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamics Are Associated With Depressive Symptoms, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroergonomics
  • Clinic evaluation of cognitive impairment in post-COVID syndrome: Performance on legacy pen-and-paper and new digital cognitive tests, 2024, Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated multiple times with Paul W. Burgess include:

  • Flaminia Ronca
  • Antonia F. de C. Hamilton
  • Ilias Tachtsidis
  • Joy Hirsch
  • Cian Xu

Publications by this researcher have appeared regularly in several respected venues. Their more frequent publication outlets include:

  • Neuropsychologia
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • NeuroImage
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Frontiers in Neuroergonomics

Best Publications

  • Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man

    Tim Shallice;Paul W. Burgess

  • The Hayling and Brixton Tests

    PW Burgess;T Shallice

  • The ecological validity of tests of executive function.

    Paul W. Burgess;Nick Alderman;Jon Evans;Hazel Emslie

  • Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome

    Barbara A. Wilson;Jonathan J. Evans;Nick Alderman;Paul W. Burgess

  • Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions

    Paul W Burgess;Tim Shallice

  • The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour.

    Timothy Shallice;Paul Burgess

  • The present and future use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience

    Paola Pinti;Ilias Tachtsidis;Antonia Hamilton;Joy Hirsch

  • The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function.

    Paul W. Burgess;Iroise Dumontheil;Iroise Dumontheil;Sam J. Gilbert

  • The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking

    Paul W Burgess;Emma Veitch;Angela de Lacy Costello;Tim Shallice

  • Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions

    John Duncan;Paul Burgess;Hazel Emslie

  • Theory and Methodology in Executive Function Research

    Paul W. Burgess

  • Functional Specialization within Rostral Prefrontal Cortex (Area 10): A Meta-analysis

    Sam J. Gilbert;Stephanie Spengler;Jon S. Simons;J. Douglas Steele

  • The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology

    Paul W. Burgess;Nick Alderman;Catrin Forbes;Angela Costello

  • Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography

    Paul W. Burgess;Angela Quayle;Christopher D. Frith

  • Confabulation and the Control of Recollection

    Paul W. Burgess;Tim Shallice

  • A Neural Mechanism Mediating the Impact of Episodic Prospection on Farsighted Decisions

    Roland G. Benoit;Roland G. Benoit;Sam J. Gilbert;Paul W. Burgess

  • The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: a lateral versus medial dissociation.

    Paul W Burgess;Sophie K Scott;Christopher D Frith

  • Current Status and Issues Regarding Pre-processing of fNIRS Neuroimaging Data: An Investigation of Diverse Signal Filtering Methods Within a General Linear Model Framework.

    Paola Pinti;Felix Scholkmann;Antonia Hamilton;Paul Burgess

  • Differential components of prospective memory? Evidence from fMRI.

    Jon S Simons;Marieke L Schölvinck;Sam J Gilbert;Chris D Frith

  • HIGHER-ORDER COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS AND FRONTAL-LOBE LESIONS IN MAN

    Tim Shallice;Paul Burgess

  • Ecological validity of a simplified version of the multiple errands shopping test

    Nick Alderman;Paul W. Burgess;Caroline Knight;Collette Henman

Frequent Co-Authors

Sam J. Gilbert
Sam J. Gilbert University College London
Chris D. Frith
Chris D. Frith University College London
Jon S. Simons
Jon S. Simons University of Cambridge
Tim Shallice
Tim Shallice University College London
Iroise Dumontheil
Iroise Dumontheil Birkbeck, University of London
Emmanuelle Volle
Emmanuelle Volle Sorbonne University
Ilias Tachtsidis
Ilias Tachtsidis University College London
Antonia F. de C. Hamilton
Antonia F. de C. Hamilton University College London
Geraint Rees
Geraint Rees University College London
Geoffrey Bird
Geoffrey Bird University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of psychology continues to evolve, many students consider related degrees and alternative career paths that offer flexibility and strong outcomes. One popular option is pursuing a degree in social work. Social work programs are available online across the country, allowing students to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments.

Choosing the right program is crucial. For instance, those searching for a balance of quality and affordability may look into the best value online social work degrees in Connecticut or consider the best value online social work degrees in Dubuque for region-specific opportunities. Both regions feature online programs recognized for excellent outcomes and robust student support.

Additionally, students from other states have options such as the best value online social work degrees in Indiana and most valuable online social work degrees in Kansas. These programs are tailored for those interested in a career that blends psychology knowledge with community impact, including roles in counseling, case management, and advocacy. With the flexibility of online study, these degrees open doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways related to psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Paul W. Burgess

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles