World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
9539
World Ranking
6171
National Ranking
496

Ilias Tachtsidis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilias Tachtsidis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 262 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ilias Tachtsidis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilias Tachtsidis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ilias Tachtsidis is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, and Cognitive Neuroscience. They also work in Pediatric and Perinatal health, as well as Biophysics.

Their main research topics include Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques, Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring, Neonatal and Fetal Brain Pathology, Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging, and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control.

Tachtsidis has contributed to numerous publications in several well-known scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include Neurophotonics, Biomedical Optics Express, Journal of Biomedical Optics, arXiv (Cornell University), and Scientific Reports.

Some of the recent papers associated with or linked to their work include:

  • Best practices for fNIRS publications, 2021, Neurophotonics
  • Optical imaging and spectroscopy for the study of the human brain: status report, 2022, Neurophotonics
  • Quantification of inter-brain coupling: A review of current methods used in haemodynamic and electrophysiological hyperscanning studies, 2023, NeuroImage
  • Systemic physiology augmented functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a powerful approach to study the embodied human brain, 2022, Neurophotonics
  • Cerebral Near Infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring in Term Infants With Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy-A Systematic Review, 2020, Frontiers in Neurology

Tachtsidis has collaborated frequently with various researchers in their field. Some of their frequent co-authors are Frédéric Lange, Paola Pinti, Antonia F. de C. Hamilton, Subhabrata Mitra, and Luca Giannoni.

Best Publications

  • The present and future use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience

    Paola Pinti;Ilias Tachtsidis;Antonia Hamilton;Joy Hirsch

  • False positives and false negatives in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: issues, challenges, and the way forward

    Ilias Tachtsidis;Felix Scholkmann

  • The physiological origin of task-evoked systemic artefacts in functional near infrared spectroscopy

    Evgeniya Kirilina;Alexander Jelzow;Angela Heine;Michael Niessing

  • Best practices for fNIRS publications

    Meryem A. Yücel;Alexander v. Lühmann;Alexander v. Lühmann;Felix Scholkmann;Judit Gervain

  • Current Status and Issues Regarding Pre-processing of fNIRS Neuroimaging Data: An Investigation of Diverse Signal Filtering Methods Within a General Linear Model Framework.

    Paola Pinti;Felix Scholkmann;Antonia Hamilton;Paul Burgess

  • Long-Term Enhancement of Brain Function and Cognition Using Cognitive Training and Brain Stimulation

    Albert Snowball;Ilias Tachtsidis;Tudor Popescu;Jacqueline Thompson

  • A Review on the Use of Wearable Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Naturalistic Environments

    Paola Pinti;Clarisse Aichelburg;Sam Gilbert;Antonia Hamilton

  • Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks

    Paola Pinti;Clarisse Aichelburg;Frida Lind;Sarah Power

  • From Jöbsis to the present day: a review of clinical near-infrared spectroscopy measurements of cerebral cytochrome-c-oxidase

    Gemma Bale;Clare E. Elwell;Ilias Tachtsidis

  • Identifying and quantifying main components of physiological noise in functional near infrared spectroscopy on the prefrontal cortex

    Evgeniya Kirilina;Na Yu;Alexander Jelzow;Heidrun Wabnitz

  • Synchronization between arterial blood pressure and cerebral oxyhaemoglobin concentration investigated by wavelet cross-correlation

    A B Rowley;S J Payne;I Tachtsidis;M J Ebden

  • Investigation of cerebral haemodynamics by near-infrared spectroscopy in young healthy volunteers reveals posture-dependent spontaneous oscillations

    Ilias Tachtsidis;Clare E Elwell;Terence S Leung;Chuen-Wai Lee

  • Modelling confounding effects from extracerebral contamination and systemic factors on functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

    Matthew Caldwell;Felix Vishnu Scholkmann;Ursula Wolf;Martin Wolf

  • Increase in cerebral aerobic metabolism by normobaric hyperoxia after traumatic brain injury

    Martin M. Tisdall;Ilias Tachtsidis;Terence S. Leung;Clare E. Elwell

  • A new broadband near-infrared spectroscopy system for in-vivo measurements of cerebral cytochrome-c-oxidase changes in neonatal brain injury

    Gemma Bale;Subhabrata Mitra;Judith Meek;Nicola Robertson

  • Clinical Brain Monitoring with Time Domain NIRS: A Review and Future Perspectives

    Frédéric Lange;Ilias Tachtsidis

  • Brain mitochondrial oxidative metabolism during and after cerebral hypoxia–ischemia studied by simultaneous phosphorus magnetic-resonance and broadband near-infrared spectroscopy

    Alan Bainbridge;Ilias Tachtsidis;S. D. Faulkner;David Price

  • Cytochrome c oxidase response to changes in cerebral oxygen delivery in the adult brain shows higher brain-specificity than haemoglobin.

    Christina Kolyva;Arnab Ghosh;Ilias Tachtsidis;David Highton

  • A physiological model of cerebral blood flow control.

    Murad Banaji;Ilias Tachtsidis;David Delpy;Stephen Baigent

  • Estimating a modified Grubb's exponent in healthy human brains with near infrared spectroscopy and transcranial Doppler.

    Terence S Leung;Ilias Tachtsidis;Martin M Tisdall;Caroline Pritchard

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin D. Smith
Martin D. Smith University of Oxford
Chris E. Cooper
Chris E. Cooper University of Essex
Antonia F. de C. Hamilton
Antonia F. de C. Hamilton University College London
Paul W. Burgess
Paul W. Burgess University College London
Pierre Gressens
Pierre Gressens Université Paris Cité
Joy Hirsch
Joy Hirsch Yale University
David L. Thomas
David L. Thomas Johns Hopkins University
Kenneth Smith
Kenneth Smith University of Nottingham
Maria Gazouli
Maria Gazouli National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Martin J. Elliott
Martin J. Elliott University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and career options. For those interested in clinical or counseling roles, online psych d programs offer a flexible path to earning a doctorate in psychology, which can complement a neuroscience background and expand your expertise.

If mental health counseling and family therapy are of interest, consider the online masters mft route. These programs can be completed quickly and prepare you for licensure in marriage and family therapy—a profession often intertwined with neuroscience discoveries.

For learners wanting to jumpstart their neuroscience careers, an accelerated bachelor's degree offers a fast-track option to enter the workforce or pursue graduate school sooner.

Finally, many neuroscience-related careers align with some of the highest paying majors, including healthcare, biotechnology, and clinical research roles. Choosing an online degree that matches your career goals can lead to rewarding and lucrative opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Ilias Tachtsidis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles