World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Blaise deB. Frederick

Blaise deB. Frederick

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
6283
World Ranking
6996
National Ranking
3014

Blaise deB. Frederick publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blaise deB. Frederick sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 129 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Blaise deB. Frederick D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blaise deB. Frederick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Blaise deB. Frederick is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and advanced neuroimaging techniques.

The scientist's work covers multiple subfields, including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The main topics of their publications involve:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The scientist has authored a number of papers in prominent journals. Recent notable publications include:

  • Safety and target engagement of an oral small-molecule sequestrant in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: an open-label phase 1b/2a trial, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Sex differences in functional network dynamics observed using coactivation pattern analysis, 2021, Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Nicotine acutely alters temporal properties of resting brain states, 2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Autonomic physiological coupling of the global fMRI signal, 2025, Nature Neuroscience
  • Introduction to the shared near infrared spectroscopy format, 2022, Neurophotonics

Frequent coauthors with whom Blaise deB. Frederick has collaborated include:

  • Amy C. Janes
  • Lia M. Hocke
  • Cole Korponay
  • Yunjie Tong
  • Roselinde H. Kaiser

The scientist's work is regularly published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Nature Medicine
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Best Publications

  • Brain Reactivity to Smoking Cues Prior to Smoking Cessation Predicts Ability to Maintain Tobacco Abstinence

    Amy C. Janes;Diego A. Pizzagalli;Sarah Richardt;Blaise de B. Frederick

  • Chemosensory cues to conspecific emotional stress activate amygdala in humans.

    Lilianne R. Mujica-Parodi;Helmut H. Strey;Blaise DeBonneval Frederick;Robert L. Savoy

  • Time lag dependent multimodal processing of concurrent fMRI and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data suggests a global circulatory origin for low-frequency oscillation signals in human brain

    Yunjie Tong;Blaise deB. Frederick;Blaise deB. Frederick

  • Choline, myo-inositol and mood in bipolar disorder: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study of the anterior cingulate cortex.

    Constance M Moore;Constance M Moore;Janis L Breeze;Staci A Gruber;Suzann M Babb;Suzann M Babb

  • Functional neuroimaging of reward circuitry responsivity to monetary gains and losses in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Igor Elman;Steven Lowen;Blaise B. Frederick;Won Chi

  • Low Frequency Systemic Hemodynamic "Noise" in Resting State BOLD fMRI: Characteristics, Causes, Implications, Mitigation Strategies, and Applications.

    Yunjie Tong;Lia Maria Hocke;Lia Maria Hocke;Blaise B Frederick;Blaise B Frederick

  • GABAergic neuroactive steroids and resting-state functional connectivity in postpartum depression: A preliminary study

    Kristina M. Deligiannidis;Elif M. Sikoglu;Scott A. Shaffer;Blaise Frederick;Blaise Frederick

  • Decoupled automated rotational and translational registration for functional MRI time series data: the DART registration algorithm.

    Luis C. Maas;Blaise deB. Frederick;Blaise deB. Frederick;Perry F. Renshaw;Perry F. Renshaw

  • In vivo detection of GABA in human brain using a localized double-quantum filter technique

    John R. Keltner;Lawrence L. Wald;Blaise De B. Frederick;Perry F. Renshaw

  • Partitioning of physiological noise signals in the brain with concurrent near-infrared spectroscopy and fMRI

    Yunjie Tong;Yunjie Tong;Kimberly P Lindsey;Kimberly P Lindsey;Blaise deB Frederick;Blaise deB Frederick

  • Prefrontal and limbic resting state brain network functional connectivity differs between nicotine-dependent smokers and non-smoking controls

    Amy C Janes;Lisa D Nickerson;Blaise De B Frederick;Marc J Kaufman

  • Low-frequency oscillations measured in the periphery with near-infrared spectroscopy are strongly correlated with blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signals

    Yunjie Tong;Yunjie Tong;Lia Maria Hocke;Lia Maria Hocke;Stephanie C. Licata;Stephanie C. Licata;Blaise deB. Frederick;Blaise deB. Frederick

  • Automated Processing of fNIRS Data—A Visual Guide to the Pitfalls and Consequences

    Lia Maria Hocke;Ibukunoluwa K. Oni;Chris C. Duszynski;Alex V. Corrigan

  • Grey and white matter GABA level differences in the human brain using two-dimensional, J-resolved spectroscopic imaging.

    J Eric Jensen;Blaise de B Frederick;Blaise de B Frederick;Perry F Renshaw;Perry F Renshaw;Perry F Renshaw

  • Neural substrates of attentional bias for smoking-related cues: an FMRI study.

    Amy C Janes;Diego A Pizzagalli;Sarah Richardt;Blaise de B Frederick

  • Multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies of brain purines in major depression.

    Perry F. Renshaw;Aimee M. Parow;Fuyuki Hirashima;Yong Ke

  • Cerebellar vermis involvement in cocaine-related behaviors.

    Carl M. Anderson;Luis C. Maas;Blaise De B. Frederick;Jacob T. Bendor

  • Insula-Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Coupling is Associated with Enhanced Brain Reactivity to Smoking Cues.

    Amy C Janes;Stacey Farmer;Alyssa L Peechatka;Blaise de B Frederick

  • Influence of baseline hematocrit and hemodilution on BOLD fMRI activation.

    Jonathan M. Levin;Blaise De B. Frederick;Marjorie H. Ross;Jonathan F. Fox

  • Correcting for Blood Arrival Time in Global Mean Regression Enhances Functional Connectivity Analysis of Resting State fMRI-BOLD Signals.

    Sinem B. Erdoğan;Sinem B. Erdoğan;Yunjie Tong;Yunjie Tong;Lia M. Hocke;Kimberly P. Lindsey;Kimberly P. Lindsey

  • Evaluating the effects of systemic low frequency oscillations measured in the periphery on the independent component analysis results of resting state networks

    Yunjie Tong;Lia Maria Hocke;Lia Maria Hocke;Lisa D. H. Nickerson;Lisa D. H. Nickerson;Stephanie C. Licata;Stephanie C. Licata

Frequent Co-Authors

Perry F. Renshaw
Perry F. Renshaw University of Utah
Scott E. Lukas
Scott E. Lukas Harvard Medical School
Marc J. Kaufman
Marc J. Kaufman Harvard University
Bruce M. Cohen
Bruce M. Cohen Harvard University
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd University of Utah
Maurizio Fava
Maurizio Fava Harvard University
John Hennen
John Hennen Harvard University
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
J. Eric Jensen
J. Eric Jensen Harvard University
Lawrence L. Wald
Lawrence L. Wald Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Blaise deB. Frederick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles