World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
16508
World Ranking
18584
National Ranking
1678

Martin J. Elliott publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Elliott sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 350 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin J. Elliott D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Elliott sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin J. Elliott is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on congenital heart disease, pediatric healthcare ethics, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The main fields of study for Elliott include Medicine, with subfields concentrating on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, and General Health Professions. The research topics covered reflect these areas and include:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Elliott has contributed to a range of recent publications with a focus on nomenclature in pediatric and congenital cardiac care as well as bioethical issues related to children's consent in heart surgery. Selected recent papers include:

  • Nomenclature for Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care: Unification of Clinical and Administrative Nomenclature - The 2021 International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC) and the Eleventh Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), 2021, Cardiology in the Young
  • Nomenclature for Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care: Unification of Clinical and Administrative Nomenclature - The 2021 International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC) and the Eleventh Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), 2021, World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
  • Living bioethics, clinical ethics committees and children's consent to heart surgery, 2021, Clinical Ethics
  • Cardiac surgery and congenital heart disease: reflections on a modern revolution, 2022, Heart
  • Living bioethics, theories and children's consent to heart surgery, 2022, Clinical Ethics

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Jeffrey P. Jacobs
  • Hiromi Kurosawa
  • Bohdan Maruszewski
  • Giovanni Stellin
  • Constantine Mavroudis

Publication venues where Elliott's work has appeared multiple times include:

  • Cardiology in the Young
  • World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
  • Clinical Ethics
  • Heart
  • Cancer Discovery

Best Publications

  • Patient Handover From Surgery to Intensive Care: Using Formula 1 Pit-Stop and Aviation Models to Improve Safety and Quality

    Ken R. Catchpole;Marc R. De Leval;Angus Mcewan;Nick Pigott

  • Stem-cell-based, tissue engineered tracheal replacement in a child: a 2-year follow-up study

    Martin J Elliott;Paolo De Coppi;Simone Speggiorin;Derek Roebuck

  • Interleukin-8 release and neutrophil degranulation after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass.

    Adam Finn;Suren Naik;Nigel Klein;Roland J. Levinsky

  • Comparison of Urokinase and Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Treatment of Childhood Empyema.

    Samatha Sonnappa;Gordon Cohen;Catherine M. Owens;Carin van Doorn

  • A prospective randomized study of a modified technique of ultrafiltration during pediatric open-heart surgery.

    S K Naik;A Knight;M Elliott

  • The nomenclature, definition and classification of cardiac structures in the setting of heterotaxy.

    Jeffrey P. Jacobs;Robert H. Anderson;Paul M. Weinberg;Henry L. Walters

  • Ultrafiltration and modified ultrafiltration in pediatric open heart operations

    Martin J. Elliott

  • A successful modification of ultrafiltration for cardiopulmonary bypass in children.

    SK Naik;A. Knight;MJ Elliott

  • D-transposition of the great arteries: the current era of the arterial switch operation.

    Juan Villafañe;M. Regina Lantin-Hermoso;Ami B. Bhatt;James S. Tweddell

  • What is operative mortality? Defining death in a surgical registry database: A report of the STS Congenital Database Taskforce and the Joint EACTS-STS Congenital Database Committee

    Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs;Constantine Mavroudis;Marshall Lewis Jacobs;Bohdan Maruszewski

  • Fate Of Subpulmonary Homograft Conduits: Determinants Of Latehomograft Failure

    J. Stark;C. Bull;M. Stajevic;M. Jothi

  • Modified Ultrafiltration Improves Left Ventricular Systolic Function In Infants After Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    Michael J. Davies;Khan Nguyen;J.William Gaynor;Martin J. Elliott

  • The nomenclature, definition and classification of hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

    Christo I. Tchervenkov;Jeffrey P. Jacobs;Paul M. Weinberg;Vera D. Aiello

  • Tissue-Engineered Tracheal Replacement in a Child: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study

    N. J. Hamilton;M. Kanani;D. J. Roebuck;R. J. Hewitt

  • Early postoperative monocyte deactivation predicts systemic inflammation and prolonged stay in pediatric cardiac intensive care

    Meredith L Allen;Mark J Peters;Allan Goldman;Martin Elliott

  • Increased plasma levels of endothelin-1 after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with pulmonary hypertension and congenital heart disease

    H. Komai;I.T. Adatia;M.J. Elliott;M.R. de Leval

  • Management of pulmonary venous obstruction after correction of TAPVC: risk factors for adverse outcome

    M Ricci;M Elliott;G A Cohen;G Catalan

  • Pediatric tracheal homograft reconstruction: A novel approach to complex tracheal stenoses in children

    Jeffrey P. Jacobs;Martin J. Elliott;Marcus P. Haw;C.Martin Bailey

  • Outcomes of slide tracheoplasty in 101 children: a 17-year single-center experience

    Colin R. Butler;Simone Speggiorin;Friso M. Rijnberg;Derek J. Roebuck

  • Nomenclature for congenital and paediatric cardiac disease: Historical perspectives and The International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code

    Rodney C.G. Franklin;Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs;Otto N. Krogmann;Marie J. Béland

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Jeffrey P. Jacobs University of Florida
J. William Gaynor
J. William Gaynor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Constantine Mavroudis
Constantine Mavroudis Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas
Marshall L. Jacobs
Marshall L. Jacobs Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Steven D. Colan
Steven D. Colan Boston Children's Hospital
Thomas L. Spray
Thomas L. Spray Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Ilias Tachtsidis
Ilias Tachtsidis University College London
Carl L. Backer
Carl L. Backer Northwestern University
Neil J. Sebire
Neil J. Sebire Great Ormond Street Hospital
Robert H. Anderson
Robert H. Anderson Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare but seeking flexible education options, there are numerous online degrees and pathways beyond medical school. Many choose nursing as a rewarding and in-demand career. Several easy nursing programs to get into offer alternative entry points to the field, making healthcare more accessible.

Registered Nurses (RNs) looking to advance their careers can enroll in rn to bsn online programs, which offer a convenient way to earn a bachelor's degree. For non-nurses with a bachelor’s in another discipline, direct entry online msn programs provide a fast track into nursing at the graduate level.

For those focused on advanced research and leadership, phd in nursing online programs allow students to pursue the highest level of nursing education without disrupting their personal or professional lives. Each pathway offers different timelines, prerequisites, and career outcomes, giving aspiring healthcare professionals several flexible options to reach their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Elliott

Trending Scientists