World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
32285
World Ranking
16435
National Ranking
8267

Lorraine C. Racusen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorraine C. Racusen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 214 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lorraine C. Racusen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorraine C. Racusen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lorraine C. Racusen is a researcher affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their scholarly contributions span multiple disciplines within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their research output includes publications that focus on transplantation, nephrology, clinical biochemistry, and surgical fields. The scientist has contributed to the understanding of renal transplantation outcomes, organ transplantation techniques, metabolism and genetic disorders, and medical history and innovations.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Lorraine C. Racusen include:

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection, 2020, American Journal of Transplantation
  • In memoriam- Dr. Robert Hodgson Heptinstall, 2021, BMC Nephrology
  • In memoriam: Robert Hodgson Heptinstall, 1920-2021, 2021, Kidney International
  • Table of Contents, 2021, Kidney International
  • Mechanisms of lysine-induced acute renal failure in rats, 2021, UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lorraine C. Racusen include:

  • Kim Solez
  • Michael Kashgarian
  • Alexandre Loupy
  • Mark Haas
  • Candice Roufosse

Common publication venues for their research are:

  • Kidney International
  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • BMC Nephrology
  • UNC Libraries

The main fields of study associated with Lorraine C. Racusen's work are:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

The scientist's subfields of study encompass:

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Transplantation
  • History
  • Nephrology

Key research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Medical History and Innovations
  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders

Best Publications

  • The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Kim Solez;Robert B. Colvin;Stephen M. Bonsib

  • Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology: Updates and Future Directions

    K. Solez;R. B. Colvin;L. C. Racusen;M. Haas

  • International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection : the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology

    K.i.m. Solez;Roy A. Axelsen;Hallgrimur Benediktsson;James F. Burdick

  • Banff '05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN').

    K. Solez;R. B. Colvin;L. C. Racusen;B. Sis

  • Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions

    M. Haas;B. Sis;L. C. Racusen;K. Solez

  • Antibody-mediated rejection criteria - an addition to the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft rejection.

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Robert B. Colvin;Kim Solez;Michael J. Mihatsch

  • The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials

    M. Haas;A. Loupy;C. Lefaucheur;C. Roufosse

  • Banff '09 meeting report: Antibody mediated graft deterioration and implementation of Banff working groups

    B. Sis;M. Mengel;M. Haas;R. B. Colvin

  • PLASMAPHERESIS AND INTRAVENOUS IMMUNE GLOBULIN PROVIDES EFFECTIVE RESCUE THERAPY FOR REFRACTORY HUMORAL REJECTION AND ALLOWS KIDNEYS TO BE SUCCESSFULLY TRANSPLANTED INTO CROSS-MATCH-POSITIVE RECIPIENTS

    Robert A. Montgomery;Andrea A. Zachary;Lorraine C. Racusen;Mary S. Leffell

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection

    Alexandre Loupy;Mark Haas;Candice Roufosse;Maarten Naesens

  • The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology.

    A. Loupy;M. Haas;K. Solez;L. Racusen

  • Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus maintenance therapy in renal allograft recipients: 24-month efficacy and safety results from the CONVERT trial.

    Francesco P. Schena;Michael D. Pascoe;Josefina Alberu;Maria del Carmen Rial

  • A 2018 Reference Guide to the Banff Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology.

    Candice Roufosse;Naomi Simmonds;Marian Clahsen-van Groningen;Mark Haas

  • The Banff 2007 working classification of skin-containing composite tissue allograft pathology.

    L. C. Cendales;J. Kanitakis;S. Schneeberger;S. Schneeberger;C. Burns

  • Banff 2011 Meeting Report: New Concepts in Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

    M. Mengel;B. Sis;M. Haas;R. B. Colvin

  • Banff 2003 meeting report: new diagnostic insights and standards.

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Philip F. Halloran;Kim Solez

  • Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society Consensus Report on Pathologic Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting of GN

    Sanjeev Sethi;Mark Haas;Glen S. Markowitz;Vivette D. D’Agati

  • B Cell Deficiency Confers Protection from Renal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

    Melissa J. Burne-Taney;Dolores B. Ascon;Frank Daniels;Lorraine Racusen

  • C4d and C3d Staining in Biopsies of ABO- and HLA-Incompatible Renal Allografts: Correlation with Histologic Findings

    M. Haas;M. H. Rahman;L. C. Racusen;E. S. Kraus

  • Transcriptional analysis of kidneys during repair from AKI reveals possible roles for NGAL and KIM-1 as biomarkers of AKI-to-CKD transition.

    Gang Jee Ko;Dmitry N Grigoryev;Douglas Linfert;Hye Ryoun Jang

Frequent Co-Authors

Hamid Rabb
Hamid Rabb Johns Hopkins University
Robert A. Montgomery
Robert A. Montgomery New York University
Mark Haas
Mark Haas Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Andrea A. Zachary
Andrea A. Zachary Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Robert B. Colvin
Robert B. Colvin Harvard University
Philip F. Halloran
Philip F. Halloran University of Alberta
Michael Mengel
Michael Mengel University of Alberta
Dorry L. Segev
Dorry L. Segev Johns Hopkins University
Robert R. Montgomery
Robert R. Montgomery Medical College of Wisconsin
Anthony J. Demetris
Anthony J. Demetris University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine isn’t the only pathway to a rewarding career in healthcare. There are several flexible online degree options that offer unique opportunities and distinct advantages for students at various stages of their education.

If you’re interested in medical administration and want a fast track, a healthcare administration accelerated degree can help launch your career quickly. For those passionate about clinical care, nursing programs are expanding accessibility, including nursing school that doesn't require teas—making the application process less stressful for some applicants.

Entry-level healthcare roles are also in demand. Wondering about support jobs with growth potential? You can get information about can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding to help start your journey without breaking the bank. Already a registered nurse with an ADN? Accelerated bridges like adn to np bridge programs enable RNs to advance more rapidly into advanced practice roles.

Online programs offer greater flexibility and accessibility for many students, whether you are beginning your healthcare career or aiming to specialize.

Best Scientists Citing Lorraine C. Racusen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles