World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
25998
World Ranking
19027
National Ranking
1718

Peter L. Lantos publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter L. Lantos sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 275 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter L. Lantos D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter L. Lantos sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter L. Lantos is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research work spans topics in medical history and research, with a particular focus on the history subfield.

The scientist has contributed to academic discourse through publications in notable venues such as PubMed and BMJ.

Recent papers by Peter L. Lantos include:

  • Between two worlds, 2020, PubMed
  • Medical information from Nazi atrocities transgresses the Nuremberg Code, 2020, BMJ

Collaborations are an integral part of Lantos's research activity. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Simon Gordon
  • T. Kádas
  • Afsana Safa

The main topics addressed in their work center on medical history and research, reflecting a thematic consistency across multiple publications.

Lantos's focus on historical perspectives in medicine contributes to the examination of ethical and historical issues in healthcare research, as seen in their publications discussing transgressions related to medical information and historical events.

Best Publications

  • The same prion strain causes vCJD and BSE

    Andrew F. Hill;Melanie Desbruslais;Susan Joiner;Katie C. L. Sidle

  • Greenfield's Neuropathology

    Joseph Godwin Greenfield;David Ian Graham;Peter L Lantos

  • A clinicopathological study of autism.

    A Bailey;P Luthert;A Dean;B Harding

  • Glial cytoplasmic inclusions in the CNS of patients with multiple system atrophy (striatonigral degeneration, olivopontocerebellar atrophy and Shy-Drager syndrome).

    Matyas I. Papp;Jacob E. Kahn;Peter L. Lantos

  • Filamentous α-synuclein inclusions link multiple system atrophy with Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies

    M G Spillantini;R A Crowther;R Jakes;N J Cairns

  • Preliminary NINDS neuropathologic criteria for Steele‐Richardson‐Olszewski syndrome (progressive supranuclear palsy)

    J.-J. Hauw;S. E. Daniel;D. Dickson;D. S. Horoupian

  • Investigation of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other human prion diseases with tonsil biopsy samples

    AF Hill;RJ Butterworth;S Joiner;G Jackson

  • Office of Rare Diseases neuropathologic criteria for corticobasal degeneration.

    Dennis W. Dickson;C. Bergeron;S. S. Chin;C. Duyckaerts

  • Neuronal loss in the frontal cortex in HIV infection.

    I.P Everall;P.J Luthert;P.L Lantos

  • Validity and reliability of the preliminary NINDS neuropathologic criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy and related disorders.

    I Litvan;J J Hauw;J J Bartko;P L Lantos

  • Neuropathological Diagnostic-criteria for Creutzfeldt-jakob-disease (cjd) and Other Human Spongiform Encephalopathies (prion Diseases)

    Herbert Budka;Adriano Aguzzi;Paul Brown;Jean-Marie Brucher

  • Validity of current clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies.

    Clive Holmes;Nigel Cairns;Peter L. Lantos;Anthony Mann

  • Corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy share a common tau haplotype

    H. Houlden;M. Baker;H. R. Morris;N. MacDonald

  • Psychiatric morbidity in dementia with Lewy bodies: a prospective clinical and neuropathological comparative study with Alzheimer's disease.

    Clive Ballard;Clive Holmes;Ian McKeith;David Neill

  • The structure of the presenilin 1 (S182) gene and identification of six novel mutations in early onset AD families

    Robert Clark;Michael Hutton;Rebecca Fuldner;Sue Froelich

  • HIV-associated disease of the nervous system: review of nomenclature and proposal for neuropathology-based terminology.

    Herbert Budka;Clayton A. Wiley;Paul Kleihues;Juan Artigas

  • Species-barrier-independent prion replication in apparently resistant species

    Andrew F. Hill;Susan Joiner;Jackie Linehan;Melanie Desbruslais

  • Cholinergic system and memory in the rat: effects of chronic ethanol, embryonic basal forebrain brain transplants and excitotoxic lesions of cholinergic basal forebrain projection system.

    T. Arendt;Y. Allen;R.M. Marchbanks;M.M. Schugens

  • Neocortical cholinergic activities differentiate Lewy body dementia from classical Alzheimer's disease

    Elaine K. Perry;Vahram Haroutunian;Kenneth L. Davis;Raymond Levy

  • Cholinergic-rich brain transplants reverse alcohol-induced memory deficits

    Thomas Arendt;Yvonne Allen;John Sinden;Markus M. Schugens

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin N. Rossor
Martin N. Rossor University College London
Nigel J. Cairns
Nigel J. Cairns University of Exeter
John Collinge
John Collinge University College London
James W. Ironside
James W. Ironside University of Edinburgh
Robert H. Perry
Robert H. Perry Newcastle University
John Hardy
John Hardy University College London
Brian H. Anderton
Brian H. Anderton King's College London
Matti Haltia
Matti Haltia University of Helsinki
Michael Mullan
Michael Mullan Roskamp Institute
Elizabeth K. Warrington
Elizabeth K. Warrington University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For aspiring healthcare professionals, exploring online degrees can offer flexibility and fast-tracked options. Many students look for programs that help them advance their nursing credentials while balancing work and personal commitments.

One popular pathway is pursuing an rn to bsn online with no clinicals, which allows registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree without traditional in-person requirements. For those interested in advancing to higher levels of practice or leadership, dnp online programs offer a flexible, often accelerated, route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

Some prospective students seek the dnp program without clinical hours, which minimizes hands-on requirements and can be more accessible for working professionals. Alternatively, those starting their nursing journey may consider online lpn programs that provide a quicker entry into the field.

Each of these online pathways comes with its own set of requirements, advantages, and potential career outcomes. Careful research can help determine which path aligns best with your personal goals and circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Peter L. Lantos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles