World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 44 6687 6419 2387 2215 141 8446

Nicole S. Lovenduski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicole S. Lovenduski between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicole S. Lovenduski published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2023. 25 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2023. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 50 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 4 publications
2005 2026

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicole S. Lovenduski: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 0
2007 2
2008 4
2009 2
2010 0
2011 1
2012 2
2013 3
2014 3
2015 9
2016 11
2017 10
2018 14
2019 19
2020 24
2021 17
2022 10
2023 50
2024 19
2025 21
2026 4
Total 227
Download as CSV

Nicole S. Lovenduski publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicole S. Lovenduski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 141
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicole S. Lovenduski D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicole S. Lovenduski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330 44
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicole S. Lovenduski is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within Earth and Environmental Sciences, with a focus on climate and oceanographic processes.

The main fields of study include Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. More specific subfields encompass Oceanography, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, and Political Science and International Relations.

Their work frequently addresses a range of topics, such as Marine and coastal ecosystems, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, Cryospheric studies and observations, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Climate variability and models, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses.

Recent papers highlight significant contributions to understanding climate systems and ocean dynamics:

  • Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections, 2020, Biogeosciences
  • Initialized Earth System prediction from subseasonal to decadal timescales, 2021, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Quantifying Errors in Observationally Based Estimates of Ocean Carbon Sink Variability, 2021, Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • External Forcing Explains Recent Decadal Variability of the Ocean Carbon Sink, 2020, AGU Advances

Nicole S. Lovenduski has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Cara Nissen
  • Tessa Gorte
  • Jan T. M. Lenaerts
  • Jeffrey B. Weiss
  • Charles Bardeen

Their publications are often found in the following venues:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Communications Earth & Environment

Best Publications

  • Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects

    Clara Deser;Flavio Lehner;Keith B. Rodgers;Toby R. Ault

  • Global Carbon and other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedbacks

    Josep G. Canadell;Pedro M.S. Monteiro;Marcos H. Costa;Leticia Cotrim Da Cunha

  • Enhanced CO2 outgassing in the Southern Ocean from a positive phase of the Southern Annular Mode

    Nicole S. Lovenduski;Nicolas Gruber;Nicolas Gruber;Scott C. Doney;Ivan D. Lima

  • The Variable Southern Ocean Carbon Sink.

    Nicolas Gruber;Peter Landschützer;Nicole S Lovenduski

  • Toward a mechanistic understanding of the decadal trends in the Southern Ocean carbon sink

    Nicole S. Lovenduski;Nicolas Gruber;Scott C. Doney

  • Impact of the Southern Annular Mode on Southern Ocean circulation and biology

    Nicole S. Lovenduski;Nicolas Gruber

  • Predicting near-term changes in the Earth System: A large ensemble of initialized decadal prediction simulations using the Community Earth System Model

    S. G. Yeager;G. Danabasoglu;N. A. Rosenbloom;W. Strand

  • Sea–air CO 2 fluxes in the Southern Ocean for the period 1990–2009

    Andrew Lenton;Bronte Tilbrook;Bronte Tilbrook;R. M. Law;Dorothee C. E. Bakker

  • Initialized Earth System prediction from subseasonal to decadal timescales

    Gerald A. Meehl;Jadwiga H. Richter;Haiyan Teng;Antonietta Capotondi;Antonietta Capotondi

  • Quantifying Errors in Observationally Based Estimates of Ocean Carbon Sink Variability

    Lucas Gloege;Galen A. McKinley;Peter Landschützer;Amanda R. Fay

  • Natural Variability and Anthropogenic Trends in the Ocean Carbon Sink

    Galen A. McKinley;Amanda R. Fay;Nicole S. Lovenduski;Darren J. Pilcher

  • Timescales for detection of trends in the ocean carbon sink

    Galen A. McKinley;Darren J. Pilcher;Darren J. Pilcher;Amanda R. Fay;Keith Lindsay

  • Coccolithophore growth and calcification in a changing ocean

    Kristen M. Krumhardt;Nicole S. Lovenduski;M. Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez;Joan A. Kleypas

  • External Forcing Explains Recent Decadal Variability of the Ocean Carbon Sink

    Galen A. McKinley;Amanda R. Fay;Yassir A. Eddebbar;Lucas Gloege

  • Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change.

    Joshua L Laughner;Jessica L Neu;David Schimel;Paul O Wennberg

  • Reducing uncertainty in projections of terrestrial carbon uptake

    Nicole S Lovenduski;Gordon B Bonan

  • Recent evidence for a strengthening CO2 sink in the Southern Ocean from carbonate system measurements in the Drake Passage (2002–2015)

    David R. Munro;Nicole S. Lovenduski;Taro Takahashi;Britton B. Stephens

  • Rapidly expanding nuclear arsenals in Pakistan and India portend regional and global catastrophe

    Owen B. Toon;Charles G. Bardeen;Alan Robock;Lili Xia

  • Partitioning uncertainty in ocean carbon uptake projections: Internal variability, emission scenario, and model structure

    Nicole S. Lovenduski;Galen A. McKinley;Amanda R. Fay;Keith Lindsay

  • Estimates of net community production in the Southern Ocean determined from time series observations (2002–2011) of nutrients, dissolved inorganic carbon, and surface ocean pCO2 in Drake Passage

    David R. Munro;Nicole S. Lovenduski;Britton B. Stephens;Timothy Newberger;Timothy Newberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Galen A. McKinley
Galen A. McKinley Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Keith Lindsay
Keith Lindsay National Center for Atmospheric Research
Matthew C. Long
Matthew C. Long National Center for Atmospheric Research
Alan Robock
Alan Robock Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Stephen G. Yeager
Stephen G. Yeager National Center for Atmospheric Research
Owen B. Toon
Owen B. Toon University of Colorado Boulder
John C. Fyfe
John C. Fyfe University of Victoria
Andrew Lenton
Andrew Lenton Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Colm Sweeney
Colm Sweeney National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Tatiana Ilyina
Tatiana Ilyina Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Environmental Sciences, several related online degrees offer valuable skills and career opportunities. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental data analysis and decision-making. Exploring the best gis programs in the us can provide specialized training in mapping and spatial data management.

Leadership and public policy knowledge are also vital for driving environmental initiatives. Pursuing an online mpa degrees program equips graduates with skills in administration, policy analysis, and program management—key for advancing careers in government or nonprofit sectors.

Understanding societal dynamics is integral to addressing environmental challenges. An online bachelors degree in sociology online offers insights into human behavior, social structures, and community engagement, enhancing one’s ability to design effective environmental solutions.

For professionals aiming to contribute to academia or higher-level research, advanced degrees are essential. Options like an edd without dissertation provide flexible pathways to doctoral credentials without the traditional dissertation, saving time while advancing expertise in education leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Nicole S. Lovenduski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles