World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
61
Citations
32546
World Ranking
2694
National Ranking
208

Dorothee C. E. Bakker publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorothee C. E. Bakker sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 186 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Dorothee C. E. Bakker D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorothee C. E. Bakker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dorothee C. E. Bakker is affiliated with the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom and specializes in research within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work predominantly focuses on subfields including Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Chemistry, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research covers various topics with significant publication activity in areas such as Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, and Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics.

Research outputs by Bakker include a range of recent papers published in notable scientific venues. Among these are:

  • Global Carbon Budget 2021, 2022, Earth system science data
  • Global Carbon Budget 2023, 2023, Earth system science data
  • Consistency and Challenges in the Ocean Carbon Sink Estimate for the Global Carbon Budget, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Trends and variability in the ocean carbon sink, 2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Carbon on the Northwest European Shelf: Contemporary Budget and Future Influences, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science

Frequent collaborators in Bakker's research include:

  • Peter Landschützer
  • Judith Hauck
  • Corinne Le Quéré
  • Nicolas Gruber
  • Christian Rödenbeck

Bakker's publications appear most frequently in the following outlets:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Ocean Science
  • Earth system science data

Best Publications

  • Global Carbon Budget 2016

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Josep G. Canadell;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2015

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;J. G. Canadell

  • Global carbon budget 2013

    C. Le Quere;G.P. Peters;R.J. Andres;Robbie M Andrew

  • Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans

    Taro Takahashi;Stewart C. Sutherland;Rik H. Wanninkhof;Colm Sweeney

  • A mesoscale phytoplankton bloom in the polar Southern Ocean stimulated by iron fertilization

    Philip W. Boyd;Andrew J. Watson;Cliff S. Law;Edward R. Abraham

  • Global Carbon Budget 2019

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Matthew W. Jones;Michael O'Sullivan;Robbie Andrew

  • Global Carbon Budget 2017

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • Importance of iron for plankton blooms and carbon dioxide drawdown in the Southern Ocean

    Hein J. W. de Baar;Jeroen T. M. de Jong;Dorothée C. E. Bakker;Bettina M. Löscher

  • Synthesis of iron fertilization experiments: From the iron age in the age of enlightenment

    Hein J.W. de Baar;Philip W. Boyd;Kenneth H. Coale;Michael R. Landry

  • A multi-decade record of high-quality fCO2 data in version 3 of the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT)

    Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Benjamin Pfeil;Benjamin Pfeil;Camilla S. Landa;Camilla S. Landa;Nicolas Metzl

  • The reinvigoration of the Southern Ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschützer;Nicolas Gruber;F. Alexander Haumann;Christian Rödenbeck

  • Recent variability of the global ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschutzer;Peter Landschutzer;Nicholas Gruber;Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Ute Schuster

  • Decadal variations and trends of the global ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschützer;Peter Landschützer;Nicolas Gruber;Dorothee C. E. Bakker

  • On the Future of Argo: A Global, Full-Depth, Multi-Disciplinary Array

    Dean Roemmich;Matthew H. Alford;Hervé Claustre;Kenneth Johnson

  • Southern Ocean deep-water carbon export enhanced by natural iron fertilization

    Raymond T. Pollard;Ian Salter;Richard J. Sanders;Mike I. Lucas

  • Extensive dissolution of live pteropods in the Southern Ocean

    N. Bednarsek;N. Bednarsek;N. Bednarsek;G. A. Tarling;D. C. E. Bakker;S. Fielding

  • Current status and past trends of the global carbon cycle

    C. L. Sabine;M. Heimann;P. Artaxo;D. C. E. Bakker

  • A neural network-based estimate of the seasonal to inter-annual variability of the Atlantic Ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschützer;Nicolas Gruber;Dorothee C.E. Bakker;Ute Schuster;Ute Schuster

  • Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean pCO2 Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)

    Christian Rödenbeck;Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Nicolas Gruber;Yosuke Iida

  • Corrigendum to "Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea-air CO2 flux over the global oceans" Deep Sea Res. II 56 (2009) 554-577 (DOI:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009)

    T Takahashi;SC Sutherland;R Wanninkhof;C Sweeney

  • Consistency and Challenges in the Ocean Carbon Sink Estimate for the Global Carbon Budget

    Judith Hauck;Moritz Zeising;Corinne Le Quéré;Nicolas Gruber

  • Corrigendum to "Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea-air CO2 flux over the global oceans" [Deep Sea Res. II 56 (2009) 554-577]

    Taro Takahashi;Stewart C. Sutherland;Rik H. Wanninkhof;Colm Sweeney

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Watson
Andrew J. Watson University of Exeter
Are Olsen
Are Olsen University of Bergen
Nicolas Metzl
Nicolas Metzl Sorbonne University
Bronte Tilbrook
Bronte Tilbrook CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Ute Schuster
Ute Schuster University of Exeter
Mario Hoppema
Mario Hoppema Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Christopher L. Sabine
Christopher L. Sabine University of Hawaii at Manoa
Richard A. Feely
Richard A. Feely University of Washington
Peter Landschützer
Peter Landschützer Max Planck Society
Truls Johannessen
Truls Johannessen University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students start with an affordable online general studies degree to build a versatile foundation before specializing.

If flexibility and time efficiency are priorities, some of the easiest degree to get options may include programs aligned with environmental studies, which can help students complete their education faster while gaining valuable skills.

For a more technical focus, an online geologist degree online offers specialized knowledge in earth sciences that complements environmental work, preparing students for careers in resource management, conservation, and research.

Additionally, the growing field of geographic information systems (GIS) plays a crucial role in environmental analysis. Pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs can enhance your ability to analyze spatial data and support decision-making in environmental management.

Best Scientists Citing Dorothee C. E. Bakker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles