World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
28828
World Ranking
4132
National Ranking
285

Mario Hoppema publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Hoppema sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 276 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mario Hoppema D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Hoppema sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mario Hoppema is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research focuses primarily on oceanography, atmospheric science, and global and planetary change, with additional specialization in environmental chemistry and ecology.

The main topics within their body of work include Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, ocean acidification effects and responses, marine and coastal ecosystems, methane hydrates and related phenomena, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, marine biology and ecology research, and oceanographic and atmospheric processes.

Recent significant publications by Mario Hoppema include:

  • "An updated version of the global interior ocean biogeochemical data product, GLODAPv2.2020" (2020), published in Earth System Science Data
  • "GLODAPv2.2022: the latest version of the global interior ocean biogeochemical data product" (2022), published in Earth System Science Data
  • "Best Practice Data Standards for Discrete Chemical Oceanographic Observations" (2022), published in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Sea-ice derived meltwater stratification slows the biological carbon pump: results from continuous observations" (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • "Multidecadal Warming and Density Loss in the Deep Weddell Sea, Antarctica" (2020), published in Journal of Climate

Their frequent co-authors include Elise S. Droste, Are Olsen, Toste Tanhua, Alex Kozyr, and Fí̄z F. Pérez, indicating ongoing collaborations in interdisciplinary research efforts.

Major publication venues where Mario Hoppema has frequently published are Earth System Science Data, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, Nature Communications, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Journal of Climate.

Best Publications

  • The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2.

    Christopher L. Sabine;Richard A. Feely;Nicolas Gruber;Robert M. Key

  • Global Carbon Budget 2016

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Josep G. Canadell;Stephen Sitch

  • Global carbon budget 2014

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;G. P. Peters

  • Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans

    Taro Takahashi;Stewart C. Sutherland;Rik H. Wanninkhof;Colm Sweeney

  • Global Carbon Budget 2018

    Corinne Le Quéré;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007

    Nicolas Gruber;Dominic Clement;Brendan Carter;Brendan Carter;Richard A. Feely

  • A multi-decade record of high-quality fCO2 data in version 3 of the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT)

    Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Benjamin Pfeil;Benjamin Pfeil;Camilla S. Landa;Camilla S. Landa;Nicolas Metzl

  • The Global Ocean Data Analysis Project version 2 (GLODAPv2) – an internally consistent data product for the world ocean

    Are Olsen;Robert M. Key;Steven van Heuven;Siv K. Lauvset;Siv K. Lauvset

  • The reinvigoration of the Southern Ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschützer;Nicolas Gruber;F. Alexander Haumann;Christian Rödenbeck

  • A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: the 1° × 1° GLODAP version 2

    Siv Kari Lauvset;Siv Kari Lauvset;Robert M. Key;Are Olsen;Are Olsen;Steven van Heuven

  • Corrigendum to "Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea-air CO2 flux over the global oceans" Deep Sea Res. II 56 (2009) 554-577 (DOI:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009)

    T Takahashi;SC Sutherland;R Wanninkhof;C Sweeney

  • Corrigendum to "Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea-air CO2 flux over the global oceans" [Deep Sea Res. II 56 (2009) 554-577]

    Taro Takahashi;Stewart C. Sutherland;Rik H. Wanninkhof;Colm Sweeney

  • Substantial advective iron loss diminishes phytoplankton production in the Antarctic Zone

    Mario Hoppema;Mario Hoppema;Hein J. W. de Baar;Eberhard Fahrbach;Hartmut H. Hellmer

  • A uniform, quality controlled Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT)

    B. Pfeil;B. Pfeil;B. Pfeil;A. Olsen;D.C.E. Bakker;S. Hankin

  • Sea–air CO 2 fluxes in the Southern Ocean for the period 1990–2009

    Andrew Lenton;Bronte Tilbrook;Bronte Tilbrook;R. M. Law;Dorothee C. E. Bakker

  • An update to the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT version 2)

    Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Benjamin Pfeil;Benjamin Pfeil;K. Smith;K. Smith;S. Hankin

  • The Weddell Gyre, Southern Ocean: Present Knowledge and Future Challenges

    M. Vernet;Walter Geibert;Mario Hoppema;P.J. Brown

  • Seasonally different carbon flux changes in the Southern Ocean in response to the southern annular mode

    Judith Hauck;Christoph Völker;Tingting Wang;Mario Hoppema

  • GLOBAL OCEAN DATA ANALYSIS PROJECT, VERSION 2 (GLODAPv2)

    R. M. Key;A. Olsen;S. van Heuven;S. K. Lauvset

  • Decadal-scale variations of water mass properties in the deep Weddell Sea

    Eberhard Fahrbach;Mario Hoppema;Gerd Rohardt;Michael Schröder

  • GLODAPv2.2019 – an update of GLODAPv2

    Are Olsen;Nico Lange;Robert M. Key;Toste Tanhua

  • Climatological Mean and Decadal Change in Surface Ocean Pco(2), and Net Sea-Air Co2 Flux Over the Global Oceans (Vol 56, Pg 554, 2009)

    T. Takahashi;S. C. Sutherland;R. Wanninkhof;C. Sweeney

Frequent Co-Authors

Are Olsen
Are Olsen University of Bergen
Bronte Tilbrook
Bronte Tilbrook CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Andrew J. Watson
Andrew J. Watson University of Exeter
Masao Ishii
Masao Ishii Japan Meteorological Agency
Truls Johannessen
Truls Johannessen University of Bergen
Dorothee C. E. Bakker
Dorothee C. E. Bakker University of East Anglia
Taro Takahashi
Taro Takahashi Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Robert M. Key
Robert M. Key Princeton University
Richard A. Feely
Richard A. Feely University of Washington
Christopher L. Sabine
Christopher L. Sabine University of Hawaii at Manoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several online degree options provide flexible and accessible pathways. Educators and professionals seeking advanced qualifications can explore edd no dissertation programs that offer doctoral-level education without the stress of a dissertation requirement.

Additionally, accredited educators looking to elevate their credentials might consider accredited eds to edd programs. These pathways facilitate a smooth academic transition from a master's-level education to a doctoral degree, ideal for career advancement in academia or administration.

For those interested in community engagement and social improvement, online options like the dsw program offer affordable and credible opportunities to make a tangible impact through social work at an advanced level.

Moreover, obtaining an accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide a broad academic foundation, complementing specialized knowledge in environmental sciences and opening doors to diverse career options.

Best Scientists Citing Mario Hoppema

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles