World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
13730
World Ranking
4361
National Ranking
199

Tobias Luck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Luck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 210 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tobias Luck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Luck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tobias Luck is affiliated with Leipzig University in Germany and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their research often intersects Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Social Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience, indicating a broad engagement with topics related to mental health and cognitive processes.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis

Luck has contributed to multiple journals, with frequent publications in venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Psychiatrische Praxis
  • ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • Das Gesundheitswesen

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Tobias Luck include:

  • "Feelings of guilt in the general adult population: prevalence, intensity and association with depression," 2020, Psychology Health & Medicine
  • "Cohort Profile: The LIFE-Adult-Study," 2022, International Journal of Epidemiology
  • "Mindreading From the Eyes Declines With Aging - Evidence From 1,603 Subjects," 2020, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • "Loss and grief in elderly people: Results from the LIFE-Adult-Study," 2020, Death Studies
  • "Increased Serum NSE and S100B Indicate Neuronal and Glial Alterations in Subjects Under 71 Years With Mild Neurocognitive Disorder/Mild Cognitive Impairment," 2022, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Tobias Luck's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Steffi G. Riedel-Heller (18 publications)
  • Arno Villringer (7 publications)
  • Melanie Luppa (7 publications)
  • Christoph Engel (6 publications)
  • Matthias L. Schroeter (6 publications)

Luck's research contributes to understanding complex psychological and neurological conditions, with particular focus on aging, mental health disorders, and cognitive impairments. Their interdisciplinary work spans empirical studies and reviews published in journals dedicated to aging neuroscience, psychology, epidemiology, and mental health.

Best Publications

  • Prediction of Institutionalization in the Elderly. A Systematic Review

    Melanie Luppa;Tobias Luck;Siegfried Weyerer;Hans-Helmut König

  • Age- and gender-specific prevalence of depression in latest-life – Systematic review and meta-analysis

    M. Luppa;C. Sikorski;T. Luck;L. Ehreke

  • Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function

    Gail Davies;Max Lam;Sarah E. Harris;Joey W. Trampush

  • Prediction of dementia by subjective memory impairment: effects of severity and temporal association with cognitive impairment.

    Frank Jessen;Birgitt Wiese;Cadja Bachmann;Sandra Eifflaender-Gorfer

  • AD dementia risk in late MCI, in early MCI, and in subjective memory impairment

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Steffen Wolfsgruber;Steffen Wolfsgruber;Birgitt Wiese;Horst Bickel

  • Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment

    Franziskus Liem;Gaël Varoquaux;Gaël Varoquaux;Jana Kynast;Frauke Beyer;Frauke Beyer

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies

    Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Colette M. Smart;Paul K. Crane;Rebecca E. Amariglio

  • Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener GAD-7, based on a large German general population sample.

    Andreas Hinz;Annette M. Klein;Elmar Brähler;Heide Glaesmer

  • Subjective cognitive decline and rates of incident Alzheimer's disease and non–Alzheimer's disease dementia

    Rosalinde E.R. Slot;Sietske A.M. Sikkes;Johannes Berkhof;Henry Brodaty

  • Prediction of institutionalisation in dementia. A systematic review.

    Melanie Luppa;Tobias Luck;Elmar Brähler;Hans-Helmut König

  • The LIFE-Adult-Study: objectives and design of a population-based cohort study with 10,000 deeply phenotyped adults in Germany

    Markus Loeffler;Christoph Engel;Peter Ahnert;Dorothee Alfermann

  • Mild cognitive impairment in general practice: age-specific prevalence and correlate results from the German study on ageing, cognition and dementia in primary care patients (AgeCoDe).

    Tobias Luck;Steffi G. Riedel-Heller;Hanna Kaduszkiewicz;Horst Bickel

  • Longitudinal Predictors of Institutionalization in Old Age.

    André Hajek;Christian Brettschneider;Carolin Lange;Tina Posselt

  • Nursing home staff training in dementia care. A systematic review of evaluated programs

    B Kuske;S Hanns;T Luck;M Angermeyer

  • Prediction of Dementia in Primary Care Patients

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Birgitt Wiese;Horst Bickel;Sandra Eiffländer-Gorfer

  • Patterns of subjective memory impairment in the elderly: association with memory performance.

    Frank Jessen;Birgitt Wiese;Gabriela Cvetanovska;Angela Fuchs

  • Systematic review of the effect of the psychosocial working environment on cognition and dementia

    Francisca S Then;Tobias Luck;Tobias Luck;Melanie Luppa;Marleen Thinschmidt

  • Training in dementia care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a training program for nursing home staff in Germany.

    Bettina Kuske;Tobias Luck;Stephanie Hanns;Herbert Matschinger

  • Alzheimer’s disease-associated (hydroxy)methylomic changes in the brain and blood

    Roy Lardenoije;Roy Lardenoije;Janou A. Y. Roubroeks;Janou A. Y. Roubroeks;Ehsan Pishva;Ehsan Pishva;Markus Leber

  • Risk factors for incident mild cognitive impairment--results from the German Study on Ageing, Cognition and Dementia in Primary Care Patients (AgeCoDe).

    T. Luck;S. G. Riedel‐Heller;M. Luppa;B. Wiese

  • Subjective cognitive decline and rates of incident Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's disease dementia

    Rosalinde E. R. Slot;Sietske A. M. Sikkes;Johannes Berkhof;Henry Brodaty

Frequent Co-Authors

Steffi G. Riedel-Heller
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller Leipzig University
Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Wolfgang Maier
Wolfgang Maier University of Bonn
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner TU Dresden
Hans-Helmut König
Hans-Helmut König Universität Hamburg
Siegfried Weyerer
Siegfried Weyerer Heidelberg University
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Melanie Luppa
Melanie Luppa Leipzig University
Birgitt Wiese
Birgitt Wiese Hannover Medical School
Christoph Engel
Christoph Engel Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a degree in Psychology in the USA, it's important to recognize closely related disciplines that may broaden your career opportunities. Social work, counseling, and human services are popular options for those passionate about supporting individuals and communities.

Many students choose to pursue online degrees in social work due to the field’s strong job outlook and direct community impact. For example, if you’re interested in the Pacific Northwest, you can explore the best social work degree programs in Portland or discover top programs by reviewing the top social work degrees in Tacoma.

Other regions also offer excellent options. If you're considering Utah, researching the top social work programs in Salt Lake City can help you find the best fit. In California, you might review the top social work degrees in San Diego for more choices.

Graduates with psychology or social work backgrounds find roles in mental health settings, schools, non-profits, or private practice. By exploring related fields and accredited online programs, you can tailor your education for flexible, impactful career pathways nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Tobias Luck

Trending Scientists