World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 81 1576 1435 141 136 373 23340

Günter K. Stalla publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Günter K. Stalla between 1983 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Günter K. Stalla published across 44 years, from 1983 to 2026, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2017. 9 of the 616 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2017. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 58 publications 2018: 51 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1983 2026

616 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Günter K. Stalla: publications per year, 1983 to 2026
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 6
1985 2
1986 8
1987 5
1988 6
1989 4
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 9
1994 10
1995 6
1996 5
1997 0
1998 9
1999 7
2000 10
2001 8
2002 4
2003 13
2004 11
2005 13
2006 26
2007 25
2008 23
2009 31
2010 26
2011 23
2012 24
2013 38
2014 24
2015 30
2016 24
2017 58
2018 51
2019 19
2020 13
2021 11
2022 3
2023 8
2024 10
2025 8
2026 1
Total 616
Download as CSV

Günter K. Stalla publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter K. Stalla sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 368–377 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 373 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59 373
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Günter K. Stalla D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter K. Stalla sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113 81
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Günter K. Stalla is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany, focusing their research within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work concentrates primarily on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, with additional contributions to Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, and Surgery.

The topics most frequently addressed in their research are:

  • Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors

Their recent notable publications include:

  • "Multivariable Prediction Model for Biochemical Response to First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly," 2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • "TP53 mutations in functional corticotroph tumors are linked to invasion and worse clinical outcome," 2022, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • "Thyroid and colorectal cancer screening in acromegaly patients: should it be different from that in the general population?", 2020, European Journal of Endocrinology
  • "Improved pasireotide response in USP8 mutant corticotroph tumours in vitro," 2022, Endocrine Related Cancer
  • "Hypoxia and the hypoxia inducible factor 1α activate protein kinase A by repressing RII beta subunit transcription," 2020, Oncogene

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Günter K. Stalla include:

  • Nicole Reisch
  • Alessandro Prete
  • Verena Theiler-Schwetz
  • Wiebke Arlt
  • Catherine Napier

Their research outputs have been published in several recurring venues, reflecting their primary engagement in endocrinology and related medical fields. These include:

  • Endocrine Abstracts
  • Journal of the Endocrine Society
  • European Journal of Endocrinology
  • BMC Medicine
  • Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes

Best Publications

  • The endogenous cannabinoid system affects energy balance via central orexigenic drive and peripheral lipogenesis

    Daniela Cota;Giovanni Marsicano;Matthias Tschöp;Yvonne Grübler

  • Impaired stress response and reduced anxiety in mice lacking a functional corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1

    Peter Timpl;Rainer Spanagel;Inge Sillaber;Adelheid Kresse

  • Treatment of Adrenocorticotropin-Dependent Cushing’s Syndrome: A Consensus Statement

    B.M.K. Biller;Ashley Barry Grossman;P.M. Stewart;Shlomo Melmed

  • The Predictive Value of Different Measures of Obesity for Incident Cardiovascular Events and Mortality

    Harald J Schneider;Nele Friedrich;Jens Klotsche;Lars Pieper

  • Accuracy of anthropometric indicators of obesity to predict cardiovascular risk.

    Harald J. Schneider;Heide Glaesmer;Jens Klotsche;Steffen Böhler

  • Somatostatin receptors: From signaling to clinical practice

    Marily Theodoropoulou;Günter K. Stalla

  • Endogenous cannabinoid system as a modulator of food intake

    D Cota;G Marsicano;B Lutz;V Vicennati

  • Clinical Characteristics and Therapeutic Responses in Patients with Germ-Line AIP Mutations and Pituitary Adenomas: An International Collaborative Study

    Adrian F. Daly;Maria A. Tichomirowa;Patrick Petrossians;Elina Heliövaara

  • Activation and Induction of NUR77/NURR1 in Corticotrophs by CRH/cAMP: Involvement of Calcium, Protein Kinase A, and MAPK Pathways

    Damián Kovalovsky;Damián Refojo;Ana Clara Liberman;Daniel Hochbaum

  • Consensus guidelines on screening for hypopituitarism following traumatic brain injury

    E. Ghigo;Brent Masel;G. Aimaretti;J. Léon-Carrión

  • Evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with Cushing's syndrome with a new questionnaire

    S M Webb;X Badia;M J Barahona;A Colao

  • Serial assessment of corticotropin-releasing hormone response after dexamethasone in depression. Implications for pathophysiology of DST nonsuppression.

    F. Holsboer;U. von Bardeleben;K. Wiedemann;O.A. Müller

  • Octreotide, a somatostatin analogue, mediates its antiproliferative action in pituitary tumor cells by altering phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling and inducing Zac1 expression.

    Marily Theodoropoulou;Jing Zhang;Sandra Laupheimer;Marcelo Paez-Pereda

  • Requirement of cannabinoid receptor type 1 for the basal modulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function.

    Daniela Cota;Michel-Alexander Steiner;Giovanni Marsicano;Cristina Cervino

  • The Gene of the Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 8 Is Frequently Mutated in Adenomas Causing Cushing's Disease.

    Luis G. Perez-Rivas;Marily Theodoropoulou;Francesco Ferraù;Clara Nusser

  • Retinoic acid prevents experimental Cushing syndrome

    Marcelo Páez-Pereda;Damian Kovalovsky;Ursula Hopfner;Marily Theodoropoulou

  • Involvement of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) in pituitary prolactinoma pathogenesis through a Smad/estrogen receptor crosstalk

    Marcelo Páez-Pereda;Damiana Giacomini;Damian Refojo;Alberto Carbia Nagashima

  • Clinical and Genetic Characterization of Pituitary Gigantism: An International Collaborative Study in 208 Patients

    Liliya Rostomyan;Adrian F. Daly;Patrick Petrossians;Emil Nachev

  • Modulation of the sleep electroencephalogram by estrogen replacement in postmenopausal women.

    Irina A. Antonijevic;Günter K. Stalla;Axel Steiger

  • Outcomes in patients with Cushing's disease undergoing transsphenoidal surgery: Systematic review assessing criteria used to define remission and recurrence

    Stephan Petersenn;Albert Beckers;Diego Ferone;Aart van der Lely

  • Pathophysiological Role of the Cytokine Network in the Anterior Pituitary Gland

    Eduardo Arzt;Marcelo Páez Pereda;Carolina Perez Castro;Uberto Pagotto

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Buchfelder
Michael Buchfelder University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Hendrik Lehnert
Hendrik Lehnert University of Warwick
Florian Holsboer
Florian Holsboer Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry
Andreas M. Zeiher
Andreas M. Zeiher Goethe University Frankfurt
Martin Reincke
Martin Reincke Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Felix Beuschlein
Felix Beuschlein University of Zurich
Uberto Pagotto
Uberto Pagotto University of Bologna
Jérôme Bertherat
Jérôme Bertherat Université Paris Cité
Paolo Beck-Peccoz
Paolo Beck-Peccoz University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in neuroscience can open the door to many rewarding careers. However, it’s important to consider your options when choosing a related program or career path. For those driven by earning potential, exploring what degrees make the most money is a smart starting point. Fields like computer science, engineering, and health sciences can also align well with neuroscience and offer strong salaries.

If affordability is a concern, consider enrolling in one of the cheap online colleges that accept federal financial aid. This can make pursuing your degree more accessible and less financially stressful.

Not ready for a full degree? There are short certificate programs that pay well, such as medical coding or data analysis. These options allow you to quickly enter the workforce and gain experience in related industries.

And if you’re looking for a smoother academic path, it’s helpful to review the easiest online degrees. These programs can offer flexibility and less academic pressure while still connecting you to careers related to neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Günter K. Stalla

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles