World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jyotishman Pathak

Jyotishman Pathak

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
10914
World Ranking
4601
National Ranking
2144

Jyotishman Pathak publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jyotishman Pathak sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 252 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jyotishman Pathak D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jyotishman Pathak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jyotishman Pathak is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with specific concentrations in Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's work has been published regularly in several prominent venues. These include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Translational Psychiatry, PLoS ONE, and arXiv (Cornell University).

Frequent co-authors in Pathak's publications include Mark Olfson, Prakash Adekkanattu, J. John Mann, Myrna M. Weissman, and Joanna M. Biernacka.

Major research topics covered by Pathak focus on areas such as Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum, Mental Health via Writing, Mental Health Research Topics, and Machine Learning in Healthcare.

Notable recent papers authored by Pathak or in collaboration include:

  • Deep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Social connectedness as a determinant of mental health: A scoping review, 2022, PLoS ONE
  • Extracting social determinants of health from electronic health records using natural language processing: a systematic review, 2021, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm for predicting the risk of postpartum depression among pregnant women, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Multimodal mental health analysis in social media, 2020, PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data

    Joshua C. Denny;Lisa Bastarache;Marylyn D. Ritchie;Robert J. Carroll

  • PheKB: A catalog and workflow for creating electronic phenotype algorithms for transportability

    Jacqueline Kirby;Peter Speltz;Luke V. Rasmussen;Melissa A. Basford

  • Electronic Medical Records for Genetic Research: Results of the eMERGE Consortium

    Abel N. Kho;Jennifer A. Pacheco;Peggy L. Peissig;Luke Rasmussen

  • Preemptive genotyping for personalized medicine: design of the right drug, right dose, right time-using genomic data to individualize treatment protocol.

    Suzette J. Bielinski;Janet E. Olson;Jyotishman Pathak;Richard M. Weinshilboum

  • Deep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review

    Chang Su;Zhenxing Xu;Jyotishman Pathak;Fei Wang

  • Variants Near FOXE1 Are Associated with Hypothyroidism and Other Thyroid Conditions: Using Electronic Medical Records for Genome- and Phenome-wide Studies

    Joshua C. Denny;Dana C. Crawford;Marylyn D. Ritchie;Suzette J. Bielinski

  • Electronic health records-driven phenotyping: challenges, recent advances, and perspectives

    Jyotishman Pathak;Abel N Kho;Joshua C Denny

  • Design and anticipated outcomes of the eMERGE-PGx project: a multicenter pilot for preemptive pharmacogenomics in electronic health record systems.

    Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik;Sarah C. Stallings;Adam S. Gordon;Berta Almoguera

  • Building a robust, scalable and standards-driven infrastructure for secondary use of EHR data

    Susan Rea;Jyotishman Pathak;Guergana Savova;Thomas A. Oniki

  • Extracting social determinants of health from electronic health records using natural language processing: a systematic review.

    Braja G Patra;Mohit M Sharma;Veer Vekaria;Prakash Adekkanattu

  • Evaluating the Process of Online Health Information Searching: A Qualitative Approach to Exploring Consumer Perspectives

    Alexander Fiksdal;Ashok Kumbamu;Ashutosh Sopan Jadhav;Christian Cocos

  • Genome- and Phenome-Wide Analyses of Cardiac Conduction Identifies Markers of Arrhythmia Risk

    Marylyn D. Ritchie;Joshua C. Denny;Rebecca L. Zuvich;Dana C. Crawford

  • A framework for semantic web services discovery

    Jyotishman Pathak;Neeraj Koul;Doina Caragea;Vasant G. Honavar

  • Knowledge-aware Assessment of Severity of Suicide Risk for Early Intervention

    Manas Gaur;Amanuel Alambo;Joy Prakash Sain;Ugur Kursuncu

  • Semi-Supervised Approach to Monitoring Clinical Depressive Symptoms in Social Media

    Amir Hossein Yazdavar;Hussein S. Al-Olimat;Monireh Ebrahimi;Goonmeet Bajaj

  • Leveraging informatics for genetic studies: use of the electronic medical record to enable a genome-wide association study of peripheral arterial disease

    Iftikhar J Kullo;Jin Fan;Jyotishman Pathak;Guergana K Savova

  • Normalization and standardization of electronic health records for high-throughput phenotyping: the SHARPn consortium

    Jyotishman D Pathak;Kent R Bailey;Calvin E. Beebe;Steven Bethard

  • Desiderata for computable representations of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithms

    Huan Mo;William K. Thompson;Luke V. Rasmussen;Jennifer A. Pacheco

  • Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm for predicting the risk of postpartum depression among pregnant women.

    Yiye Zhang;Shuojia Wang;Alison Hermann;Rochelle Joly

  • Importance of multi-modal approaches to effectively identify cataract cases from electronic health records

    Peggy L Peissig;Luke V Rasmussen;Luke V Rasmussen;Richard L Berg;James G Linneman

  • Clinical phenotyping in selected national networks

    Rachel L. Richesson;Jimeng Sun;Jyotishman Pathak;Abel N. Kho

  • Mapping clinical phenotype data elements to standardized metadata repositories and controlled terminologies: the eMERGE Network experience.

    Jyotishman Pathak;Janey Wang;Sudha Kashyap;Melissa A. Basford

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher G. Chute
Christopher G. Chute Johns Hopkins University
Joshua C. Denny
Joshua C. Denny National Institutes of Health
Vasant Honavar
Vasant Honavar Pennsylvania State University
Dan M. Roden
Dan M. Roden Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Amit P. Sheth
Amit P. Sheth University of South Carolina
Gerard Tromp
Gerard Tromp Stellenbosch University
Catherine A. McCarty
Catherine A. McCarty University of Minnesota
Marylyn D. Ritchie
Marylyn D. Ritchie University of Pennsylvania
Rex L. Chisholm
Rex L. Chisholm Northwestern University
Erwin P. Bottinger
Erwin P. Bottinger Hasso Plattner Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science can open doors to many interdisciplinary fields. If you’re looking for flexible learning, a broad selection of environmental engineering degree online options let you connect technology with sustainable solutions. These programs merge core computer skills with hands-on approaches to real-world environmental challenges.

For those interested in technical roles, consider the cheapest online master’s mechanical engineering programs. These online degrees allow you to advance your engineering knowledge without breaking the bank or relocating.

Expanding your analytical skills is possible with online physics degrees, integrating computational thinking with fundamental science.

If you’re passionate about trending tech careers, the cheapest data science degree choices offer a fast track into analytics, machine learning, and AI fields.

With these affordable online programs, you can customize your educational pathway and gain the specialized skills most in demand by today’s employers, all while studying from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Jyotishman Pathak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles