World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
8538
World Ranking
14682
National Ranking
6139

Allen M. Samarel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allen M. Samarel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 195 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Allen M. Samarel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allen M. Samarel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Allen M. Samarel is affiliated with Loyola University Chicago in the United States. Their academic profile reflects engagement within a research environment, although specific details on recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are not available.

There is no recorded data on book publications associated with Allen M. Samarel, nor detailed information about distinct main or subfields of study linked to their research activities.

Similarly, there is no compiled list of main topics or themes addressed by their work, and no awards have been documented to provide further insight into recognitions or distinctions received by the researcher.

While detailed content regarding research output and collaborative relationships is not present, the affiliation with Loyola University Chicago situates Allen M. Samarel within an academic institution known for multidisciplinary scholarship.

Best Publications

  • Costameres, focal adhesions, and cardiomyocyte mechanotransduction.

    Allen M. Samarel

  • Hydrogen Peroxide Activates Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases and Na+-H+ Exchange in Neonatal Rat Cardiac Myocytes

    Abdelkarim Sabri;Kenneth L. Byron;Allen M. Samarel;Jeremy Bell

  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Regulates Focal Adhesion Assembly in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells through Activation of the Focal Adhesion Kinase and Related Adhesion Focal Tyrosine Kinase

    Hava Karsenty Avraham;Tae-Hee Lee;Youngho Koh;Tae-Aug Kim

  • Suppression of RhoA activity by focal adhesion kinase-induced activation of p190RhoGAP: role in regulation of endothelial permeability.

    Michael Holinstat;Nebojsa Knezevic;Michael Broman;Allen M. Samarel

  • Differential Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascades and Apoptosis by Protein Kinase C ε and δ in Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes

    Maria C. Heidkamp;Allison L. Bayer;Jody L. Martin;Allen M. Samarel

  • Calcium- and Protein Kinase C–Dependent Activation of the Tyrosine Kinase PYK2 by Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle

    Abdelkarim Sabri;Geetha Govindarajan;Tina M. Griffin;Kenneth L. Byron

  • An anticancer C-Kit kinase inhibitor is reengineered to make it more active and less cardiotoxic

    Ariel Fernández;Angela Sanguino;Zhenghong Peng;Eylem Ozturk;Eylem Ozturk

  • Fibronectin fragment activation of proline-rich tyrosine kinase PYK2 mediates integrin signals regulating collagenase-3 expression by human chondrocytes through a protein kinase C-dependent pathway.

    Richard Frank Loeser;Christopher B. Forsyth;Allen M. Samarel;Hee Jeong Im

  • Mechanical forces regulate focal adhesion and costamere assembly in cardiac myocytes

    Will W. Sharp;David G. Simpson;Thomas K. Borg;Allen M. Samarel

  • Cardiac Dysfunction Occurs in the HIV-1 Transgenic Mouse Treated with Zidovudine

    William Lewis;Ingrid L. Grupp;Günter Grupp;Brian D Hoit

  • GFP-FRNK Disrupts Focal Adhesions and Induces Anoikis in Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes

    Maria C. Heidkamp;Allison L. Bayer;Jared A. Kalina;Diane M. Eble

  • Endothelin-induced cardiac myocyte hypertrophy: role for focal adhesion kinase

    Diane M. Eble;James B. Strait;Geetha Govindarajan;Jueren Lou

  • Downregulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase during progression of left ventricular hypertrophy.

    Ming Qi;Thomas R. Shannon;David E. Euler;Donald M Bers

  • Mechanical Stress-Induced Sarcomere Assembly for Cardiac Muscle Growth in Length and Width

    Brenda Russell;Matthew W. Curtis;Yevgeniya E. Koshman;Allen M. Samarel

  • Restoration of Resting Sarcomere Length After Uniaxial Static Strain Is Regulated by Protein Kinase Cε and Focal Adhesion Kinase

    Haytham Mansour;Pieter P. de Tombe;Allen M. Samarel;Brenda Russell

  • Physiological Replacement of T3 Improves Left Ventricular Function in an Animal Model of Myocardial Infarction-Induced Congestive Heart Failure

    Kyle K. Henderson;Sara Danzi;Jennifer T. Paul;Greg Leya

  • Contractile activity modulates myosin heavy chain-beta expression in neonatal rat heart cells.

    A. M. Samarel;G. L. Engelmann

  • Distinct Pathways Regulate Expression of Cardiac Electrical and Mechanical Junction Proteins in Response to Stretch

    Kiyomi Yamada;Karen G. Green;Allen M. Samarel;Jeffrey E. Saffitz

  • Ca flux, contractility, and excitation-contraction coupling in hypertrophic rat ventricular myocytes

    Eileen McCall;Kenneth S. Ginsburg;Rosana A. Bassani;Thomas R. Shannon

  • Thyroid hormone and hemodynamic regulation of beta-myosin heavy chain promoter in the heart.

    K Ojamaa;J D Klemperer;S S MacGilvray;I Klein

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald M. Bers
Donald M. Bers University of California, Davis
Thomas K. Borg
Thomas K. Borg Medical University of South Carolina
Louis Terracio
Louis Terracio New York University
Dorian O. Haskard
Dorian O. Haskard Imperial College London
Michael S. Parmacek
Michael S. Parmacek University of Pennsylvania
Joseph J. Boyle
Joseph J. Boyle Imperial College London
David G. Simpson
David G. Simpson Virginia Commonwealth University
R. John Solaro
R. John Solaro University of Illinois at Chicago
Francis W. Ruscetti
Francis W. Ruscetti National Institutes of Health
Tejal A. Desai
Tejal A. Desai University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring biology and biochemistry can open doors to a wide variety of online degree options and rewarding career paths in healthcare and science. Many students now choose online biology bachelor’s degree programs to fast-track their entry into lab research, environmental analysis, or pre-med pathways. These flexible programs are ideal for balancing studies with other life commitments.

If hands-on patient care interests you, consider accredited online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid. These courses make it easier for aspiring health workers to get started quickly and affordably. For those already working as medical assistants, there’s also a clear progression through MA to LPN bridge programs, offering a streamlined route to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse.

For those leaning toward the nutrition and health sciences, researching the best dietetics masters programs can help advance your expertise and career prospects as a registered dietitian or nutritionist. Whether you want to work in a clinic, hospital, or research setting, these online pathways provide the flexibility and credentials essential for success.

Best Scientists Citing Allen M. Samarel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles