World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13185 12411 6720 6215 465 27637

Andrew D. McCulloch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew D. McCulloch between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew D. McCulloch published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2014. 32 of the 517 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2014. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 11 publications
1982 2025

517 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew D. McCulloch: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 7
1992 3
1993 9
1994 6
1995 6
1996 10
1997 7
1998 17
1999 10
2000 9
2001 16
2002 11
2003 12
2004 9
2005 14
2006 14
2007 13
2008 30
2009 15
2010 18
2011 13
2012 31
2013 13
2014 33
2015 12
2016 29
2017 14
2018 12
2019 19
2020 27
2021 12
2022 17
2023 14
2024 21
2025 11
Total 517
Download as CSV

Andrew D. McCulloch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. McCulloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 465 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 465
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew D. McCulloch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. McCulloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew D. McCulloch is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their work centers on several key topics including:

  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Andrew D. McCulloch has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in venues such as:

  • Biophysical Journal
  • Circulation
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Heart Rhythm
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Andrew D. McCulloch include:

  • Research Priorities for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2020, Circulation
  • Direct 3D bioprinting of cardiac micro-tissues mimicking native myocardium, 2020, Biomaterials
  • Cardiac cell type-specific gene regulatory programs and disease risk association, 2021, Science Advances
  • Three-dimensional transistor arrays for intra- and inter-cellular recording, 2021, Nature Nanotechnology
  • Plakophilin-2 gene therapy prevents and rescues arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in a mouse model harboring patient genetics, 2023, Nature Cardiovascular Research

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Jeffrey H. Omens
  • Alistair A. Young
  • Sachin Govil
  • James C. Perry
  • Abigail E. Teitgen

Best Publications

  • Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues

    Edward K. Rodriguez;Anne Hoger;Andrew D. McCulloch

  • The Cardiac Mechanical Stretch Sensor Machinery Involves a Z Disc Complex that Is Defective in a Subset of Human Dilated Cardiomyopathy

    Ralph Knöll;Masahiko Hoshijima;Hal M. Hoffman;Veronika Person

  • A myocardial lineage derives from Tbx18 epicardial cells

    Chen-Leng Cai;Jody C. Martin;Yunfu Sun;Li Cui

  • Passive material properties of intact ventricular myocardium determined from a cylindrical model.

    J M Guccione;A D McCulloch;L K Waldman

  • Modelling the mechanical properties of cardiac muscle

    P.J. Hunter;A.D. McCulloch;H.E.D.J. ter Keurs

  • A collocation-Galerkin finite element model of cardiac action potential propagation

    J.M. Rogers;A.D. McCulloch

  • Finite element stress analysis of left ventricular mechanics in the beating dog heart

    Julius M. Guccione;Kevin D. Costa;Andrew D. McCulloch

  • Laminar fiber architecture and three-dimensional systolic mechanics in canine ventricular myocardium

    Kevin D. Costa;Yasuo Takayama;Andrew D. McCulloch;James W. Covell

  • Modelling cardiac mechanical properties in three dimensions

    Kevin D. Costa;Jeffrey W. Holmes;Andrew D. McCulloch

  • Angiotensin II stimulates the autocrine production of transforming growth factor-β1 in adult rat cardiac fibroblasts

    Ann A. Lee;Wolfgang H. Dillmann;Andrew D. McCulloch;Francisco J. Villarreal

  • Theory of Heart: Biomechanics, Biophysics, and Nonlinear Dynamics of Cardiac Function

    Leon Glass;Peter Hunter;Andrew McCulloch

  • Three-dimensional analysis of regional cardiac function: a model of rabbit ventricular anatomy

    Frederick J. Vetter;Andrew D. McCulloch

  • Research Priorities for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group Summary.

    Sanjiv J. Shah;Barry A. Borlaug;Dalane W. Kitzman;Andrew D. McCulloch

  • Coupling of a 3D Finite Element Model of Cardiac Ventricular Mechanics to Lumped Systems Models of the Systemic and Pulmonic Circulation

    Roy C. P. Kerckhoffs;Maxwell L. Neal;Quan Gu;James B. Bassingthwaighte

  • Lentiviral vectors and protocols for creation of stable hESC lines for fluorescent tracking and drug resistance selection of cardiomyocytes.

    Hiroko Kita-Matsuo;Maria Barcova;Natalie Prigozhina;Nathan Salomonis

  • Mechanics of Active Contraction in Cardiac Muscle: Part II—Cylindrical Models of the Systolic Left Ventricle

    J. M. Guccione;L. K. Waldman;A. D. McCulloch

  • An FHL1-containing complex within the cardiomyocyte sarcomere mediates hypertrophic biomechanical stress responses in mice

    Farah Sheikh;Anna Raskin;Pao Hsien Chu;Stephan Lange

  • Modeling beta-adrenergic control of cardiac myocyte contractility in silico

    Jeffrey J. Saucerman;Laurence L. Brunton;Anushka P. Michailova;Anushka P. Michailova;Andrew D. McCulloch

  • A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method for Large Elastic Deformations of Ventricular Myocardium: II—Prolate Spheroidal Coordinates

    K. D. Costa;P. J. Hunter;J. S. Wayne;L. K. Waldman

  • Cai et al. reply

    Chen-Leng Cai;Jody C. Martin;Yunfu Sun;Li Cui

Frequent Co-Authors

James W. Covell
James W. Covell University of California, San Diego
J. Andrew McCammon
J. Andrew McCammon University of California, San Diego
Ju Chen
Ju Chen University of California, San Diego
Peter Hunter
Peter Hunter University of Auckland
Adam Wright
Adam Wright Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Kirk L. Peterson
Kirk L. Peterson University of California, San Diego
Michael Holst
Michael Holst University of California, San Diego
Sylvia M. Evans
Sylvia M. Evans University of Montana
Michael Regnier
Michael Regnier University of Washington
Joan Heller Brown
Joan Heller Brown University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding healthcare careers. Online education now makes it much easier for students to tailor their pathways. For those interested in mental health and advanced nursing, there are online msn pmhnp programs available, designed to provide flexibility and support for nurse practitioners specializing in psychiatric and mental health care.

Not all future healthcare professionals want to work directly with patients; many choose management tracks. Pursuing a healthcare administration degree online provides foundational business and leadership skills crucial for managing medical organizations. To further advance, candidates frequently seek the most affordable mha programs to enhance career prospects in hospital administration, policy, and consulting roles.

For nursing professionals aiming for the highest clinical leadership roles, the cheapest bsn to dnp programs offer accessible routes to a Doctor of Nursing Practice. These advanced degrees help bridge the gap between clinical care and healthcare innovation. Whether your ambition lies in clinical practice or healthcare leadership, online programs provide the flexible learning opportunities needed to succeed.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew D. McCulloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles