World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
21759
World Ranking
16747
National Ranking
8400

James W. Covell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Covell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 184 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James W. Covell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Covell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James W. Covell is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic work is connected to this institution, indicating involvement in research and teaching within this university environment.

This researcher does not have listed recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications documented in the present data.

No specific main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics are provided in the available information. There are similarly no recorded awards or honors associated with their profile.

The absence of such details suggests either a limited publicly available research footprint or incomplete data on their academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • Factors Influencing Infarct Size Following Experimental Coronary Artery Occlusions

    Peter R. Maroko;John K. Kjekshus;Burton E. Sobel;Tan Watanabe

  • Effects of changes in preload, afterload and inotropic state on ejection and isovolumic phase measures of contractility in the conscious dog.

    Felix Mahler;John Ross;Robert A. O'Rourke;James W. Covell

  • Dependence of ventricular distensibility on filling of the opposite ventricle.

    RR Taylor;JW Covell;EH Sonnenblick;J Ross

  • Transmural myocardial deformation in the canine left ventricle. Normal in vivo three-dimensional finite strains.

    L K Waldman;Y C Fung;J W Covell

  • Precordial S-T segment elevation mapping: An atraumatic method for assessing alterations in the extent of myocardial ischemic injury

    Peter R. Maroko;Peter Libby;James W. Covell;Burton E. Sobel

  • Structure and Mechanics of Healing Myocardial Infarcts

    Jeffrey W Holmes;Thomas K Borg;James W Covell

  • Velocity of contraction as a determinant of myocardial oxygen consumption

    Edmund H. Sonnenblick;John Ross;James W. Covell;Gerard A. Kaiser

  • Transverse Shear Along Myocardial Cleavage Planes Provides a Mechanism for Normal Systolic Wall Thickening

    I. J. LeGrice;Y. Takayama;J. W. Covell

  • Laminar fiber architecture and three-dimensional systolic mechanics in canine ventricular myocardium

    Kevin D. Costa;Yasuo Takayama;Andrew D. McCulloch;James W. Covell

  • Effect of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion on Myocardial Infarction following Experimental Coronary Artery Occlusion

    P. R. Maroko;P. Libby;B. E. Sobel;C. M. Bloor

  • Control of myocardial oxygen consumption: relative influence of contractile state and tension development.

    Thomas P. Graham;James W. Covell;Edmund H. Sonnenblick;John Ross

  • Relation between transmural deformation and local myofiber direction in canine left ventricle.

    L K Waldman;D Nosan;F Villarreal;J W Covell

  • Coronary Artery Reperfusion: II. REDUCTION OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCT SIZE AT 1 WEEK AFTER THE CORONARY OCCLUSION

    W. R. Ginks;H. D. Sybers;P. R. Maroko;J. W. Covell

  • Regional myocardial function and dimensions early and late after myocardial infarction in the unanesthetized dog.

    P Theroux;Jr J Ross;D Franklin;JW Covell

  • Contractile State of the Heart Characterized by Force-Velocity Relations in Variably Afterloaded and Isovolumic Beats

    John Ross;James W. Covell;Edmund H. Sonnenblick;Eugene Braunwald

  • A comparison of pressure-volume relations of the fetal, newborn, and adult heart

    T Romero;J Covell;WF Friedman

  • Congestive heart failure following chronic tachycardia

    Henry Neal Coleman;Henry Neal Coleman;Roger R. Taylor;Roger R. Taylor;Peter E. Pool;Peter E. Pool;Gerald H. Whipple;Gerald H. Whipple

  • Granulocytes cause reperfusion ventricular dysfunction after 15-minute ischemia in the dog.

    R Engler;J W Covell

  • Assessment of cardiac contractility. The relation between the rate of pressure rise and ventricular pressure during isovolumic systole.

    Dean T. Mason;Eugene Braunwald;James W. Covell;Edmund H. Sonnenblick

  • Diastolic Geometry and Sarcomere Lengths in the Chronically Dilated Canine Left Ventricle

    John Ross;Edmund H. Sonnenblick;Roger R. Taylor;Henry M. Spotnitz

Frequent Co-Authors

John Ross
John Ross University of California, San Diego
Eugene Braunwald
Eugene Braunwald Harvard Medical School
Edmund H. Sonnenblick
Edmund H. Sonnenblick Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Andrew D. McCulloch
Andrew D. McCulloch University of California, San Diego
Wolfgang H. Dillmann
Wolfgang H. Dillmann University of California, San Diego
Peter Libby
Peter Libby Brigham and Women's Hospital
Gerald D. Buckberg
Gerald D. Buckberg University of California, Los Angeles
Burton E. Sobel
Burton E. Sobel Washington University in St. Louis
John Ross
John Ross University of Tasmania
Victor F. Froelicher
Victor F. Froelicher Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative routes within healthcare and medicine can open diverse career opportunities, especially with the increasing availability of flexible online programs. For those interested in the administrative side, earning the cheapest master's in healthcare administration can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations without the high tuition costs.

If you’re aiming for advanced clinical positions, consider pursuing one of the best online dnp programs. These programs are ideal for nurses seeking the highest level of practice-based training from accredited institutions, all through distance learning.

Aspiring pharmacists can now access high-quality pharmacy school online options. These accredited programs cover everything from clinical knowledge to innovative pharmacy practice, perfect for students needing schedule flexibility.

For those interested in medical data and records management, pursuing rhia certification programs online can open doors to vital roles in health information management. These programs are designed to help you meet RHIA exam requirements and advance your health informatics career.

Best Scientists Citing James W. Covell

Recently Published Articles