World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
93
Citations
43842
World Ranking
962
National Ranking
516

Matti Hämäläinen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matti Hämäläinen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 353 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matti Hämäläinen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matti Hämäläinen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matti Hämäläinen is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of neuroscience, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience. They have contributed extensively to the understanding of brain function through various advanced neurophysiological methods and imaging techniques.

The scientist's work covers several subfields, including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Signal Processing
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Key topics in their research include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Frequent venues for their publications are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • NeuroImage
  • Human Brain Mapping

Matti Hämäläinen has often collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Sheraz Khan
  • Fahimeh Mamashli
  • Tal Kenet
  • Nicole M. McGuiggan
  • Robert M. Joseph

Some notable recent publications include:

  • "Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), a new software tool for interpreting the cellular and network origin of human MEG/EEG data," 2020, published in eLife
  • "Spatial fidelity of MEG/EEG source estimates: A general evaluation approach," 2020, published in NeuroImage
  • "Detectability of cerebellar activity with magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography," 2020, published in Human Brain Mapping
  • "High-Density EEG in Current Clinical Practice and Opportunities for the Future," 2021, published in Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Enhanced Modeling of Neurophysiological Recordings," 2020, published in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Best Publications

  • Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain

    Matti Hämäläinen;Riitta Hari;Risto J. Ilmoniemi;Jukka Knuutila

  • MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python

    Alexandre Gramfort;Martin Luessi;Eric Larson;Denis A. Engemann

  • Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates

    M. S. Hämäläinen;R. J. Ilmoniemi

  • MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data

    Alexandre Gramfort;Martin Luessi;Eric Larson;Denis A. Engemann

  • Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain

    Joachim Gross;J. Kujala;M. Hämäläinen;L. Timmermann

  • Top-down facilitation of visual recognition

    M. Bar;K. S. Kassam;A. S. Ghuman;J. Boshyan

  • Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data

    M.S. Hamalainen;J. Sarvas

  • Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings

    R. Vigario;J. Sarela;V. Jousmiki;M. Hamalainen

  • Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates.

    K. Uutela;M. Hämäläinen;E. Somersalo

  • Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex

    Mikko Sams;Reijo Aulanko;Matti Hämäläinen;Riitta Hari

  • Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates

    Fa-Hsuan Lin;Thomas Witzel;Seppo P. Ahlfors;Steven M. Stufflebeam

  • Functional Organization of the Human First and Second Somatosensory Cortices: a Neuromagnetic Study

    Riitta Hari;J. Karhu;M. Hämäläinen;J. Knuutila

  • Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: neuromagnetic recordings in man.

    Riitta Hari;Matti Hämäläinen;R. Ilmoniemi;E. Kaukoranta

  • Neural mechanisms of transient neocortical beta rhythms: Converging evidence from humans, computational modeling, monkeys, and mice.

    Maxwell A. Sherman;Shane Lee;Robert Law;Saskia Haegens;Saskia Haegens

  • 122-channel squid instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain

    A I Ahonen;M S Hämäläinen;M J Kajola;J E T Knuutila

  • Task-modulated what and where pathways in human auditory cortex

    Jyrki Ahveninen;Iiro P. Jääskeläinen;Iiro P. Jääskeläinen;Tommi Raij;Giorgio Bonmassar

  • Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in man

    R Hari;R Hari;K Reinikainen;E Kaukoranta;M Hämäläinen

  • Local and long-range functional connectivity is reduced in concert in autism spectrum disorders

    Sheraz Khan;Alexandre Gramfort;Alexandre Gramfort;Nandita R. Shetty;Manfred G. Kitzbichler

  • Distributed current estimates using cortical orientation constraints.

    Fa‐Hsuan Lin;John W. Belliveau;Anders M. Dale;Matti S. Hämäläinen

  • Independent Component Analysis for Identification of Artifacts in Magnetoencephalographic Recordings

    Ricardo Vigário;Veikko Jousmäki;Matti Hämäläinen;Riitta Hari

Frequent Co-Authors

Riitta Hari
Riitta Hari Aalto University
Seppo P. Ahlfors
Seppo P. Ahlfors Harvard University
Steven M. Stufflebeam
Steven M. Stufflebeam Harvard University
Mikko Sams
Mikko Sams Aalto University
Jyrki Ahveninen
Jyrki Ahveninen Harvard University
John W. Belliveau
John W. Belliveau Harvard University
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Risto J. Ilmoniemi Aalto University
Iiro P. Jääskeläinen
Iiro P. Jääskeläinen Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Matti Hämäläinen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles