World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1350 1200 259 233 320 15165

Philip Clarke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip Clarke between 1978 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip Clarke published across 44 years, from 1978 to 2021, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2015. 52 of the 343 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2015. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 26 publications
1978 2021

343 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip Clarke: publications per year, 1978 to 2021
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 5
2002 5
2003 4
2004 6
2005 3
2006 9
2007 6
2008 10
2009 10
2010 15
2011 19
2012 8
2013 37
2014 32
2015 39
2016 15
2017 22
2018 20
2019 16
2020 26
2021 26
Total 343
Download as CSV

Philip Clarke publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Clarke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 314–323 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 320 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101 320
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip Clarke D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Clarke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with Type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68)

    P M Clarke;A M Gray;A Briggs;A J Farmer

  • Applied Methods of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Healthcare

    A M Gray;P M Clarke;J Wolstenholme;S Wordsworth

  • The Lancet Commission on diabetes: using data to transform diabetes care and patient lives

    Juliana C N Chan;Lee-Ling Lim;Nicholas J Wareham;Jonathan E Shaw

  • Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62):

    Philip Clarke;Alastair Gray;Rury Holman

  • UKPDS Outcomes Model 2: a new version of a model to simulate lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from the 30 year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: UKPDS 82

    A J Hayes;J J Leal;A M Gray;R R Holman

  • Missing... presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data.

    Andrew Briggs;Taane Clark;Jane Wolstenholme;Philip Clarke

  • Effects of Allopurinol on the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

    Sunil V Badve;Elaine M Pascoe;Anushree Tiku;Neil Boudville

  • Guidelines for computer modeling of diabetes and its complications

    R Bergemann;J Brown;W Chan;P Clarke

  • The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: results from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS Study No. 65).

    P Clarke;A Gray;R Legood;A Briggs

  • 'Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications: A report on the Fourth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting'

    A J Palmer;S Roze;W J Valentine;P McEwan

  • Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping

    Alastair M. Gray;Oliver Rivero-Arias;Philip M. Clarke

  • Patients' and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study.

    Christopher Dowrick;Geraldine M Leydon;Anita McBride;Amanda Howe

  • Management of depression in UK general practice in relation to scores on depression severity questionnaires: analysis of medical record data

    Tony Kendrick;Christopher Dowrick;Anita McBride;Amanda Howe

  • Forgetting to remember or remembering to forget: A study of the recall period length in health care survey questions.

    Gustav Kjellsson;Philip Clarke;Ulf-G Gerdtham

  • Cost effectiveness of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes: economic evaluation of data from the DiGEM trial

    Judit Simon;Alastair Gray;Philip Clarke;Alisha Wade

  • Survival of the fittest: retrospective cohort study of the longevity of Olympic medallists in the modern era

    Philip M Clarke;Simon J Walter;Andrew Hayen;William J Mallon

  • Optimal recall length in survey design.

    Philip M Clarke;Denzil G Fiebig;Ulf-G Gerdtham;Ulf-G Gerdtham

  • Applied Methods of Cost-benefit Analysis in Health Care

    E. McIntosh;P. Clarke;E. Frew;J.J. Louviere

  • On the measurement of relative and absolute income-related health inequality

    Philip M Clarke;Ulf-G Gerdtham;Magnus Johannesson;Kerstin Bingefors

  • Horizontal inequities in Australia's mixed public/private health care system.

    Eddy Van Doorslaer;Eddy Van Doorslaer;Philip Clarke;Elizabeth Savage;Jane Hall

  • Cost-utility analyses of intensive blood glucose and tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 72)

    P. M. Clarke;A. M. Gray;A. Briggs;R. J. Stevens

  • Patient Health Questionnaire

    C Dowrick;C Chew-Graham;K Lovell;J Lamb

Frequent Co-Authors

Rafael Perera
Rafael Perera University of Oxford
Alastair Gray
Alastair Gray University of Oxford
Linda Gask
Linda Gask University of Manchester
Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester
Rury R. Holman
Rury R. Holman University of Oxford
Nicholas Graves
Nicholas Graves Queensland University of Technology
Peter F. M. Choong
Peter F. M. Choong University of Melbourne
John Chalmers
John Chalmers University of New South Wales
Helen M. Colhoun
Helen M. Colhoun University of Edinburgh
Paul Glasziou
Paul Glasziou Bond University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse opportunities, from counseling and therapy to psychology and social work. Thanks to online education, many pathways are now more accessible and affordable than ever.

Students interested in counseling might consider enrolling in one of the cacrep accredited online programs. These degrees meet rigorous standards, offering quality training for future counselors.

For those passionate about family dynamics and relationship support, an online masters in marriage and family therapy provides flexibility and affordability while preparing graduates for licensure and private practice.

Psychology remains a popular choice for many students. If budget is a concern, consider a cheapest online degree in psychology as a first step into the world of mental health, research, and counseling careers.

Finally, those seeking to make a difference in community well-being can explore msw online programs. These programs lead to social work careers and offer flexible admission requirements, making them accessible to a wide range of students.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Clarke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles