World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
7563
World Ranking
6730
National Ranking
303

Matthijs Vink publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthijs Vink sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthijs Vink D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthijs Vink sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthijs Vink is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans numerous topics within these fields, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main fields of study associated with Matthijs Vink include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these broad fields, their research addresses several subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Education
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

The topics that frequently appear in Matthijs Vink's research consist of:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Matthijs Vink has published in various academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Acta Psychologica

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Matthijs Vink are:

  • "Towards an integrated account of the development of self-regulation from a neurocognitive perspective: A framework for current and future longitudinal multi-modal investigations," 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "The YOUth study: Rationale, design, and study procedures," 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "The YOUth cohort study: MRI protocol and test-retest reliability in adults," 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "Childhood trauma exposure and reward processing in healthy adults: A functional neuroimaging study," 2022, Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • "Disrupted upregulation of salience network connectivity during acute stress in siblings of schizophrenia patients," 2020, Psychological Medicine

Matthijs Vink frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Thomas E. Gladwin
  • Pascal Pas
  • Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol
  • Judith van Leeuwen
  • Christiaan H. Vinkers

Best Publications

  • A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

    Frederick Verbruggen;Adam R. Aron;Guido Ph Band;Christian Beste

  • Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Martijn Figee;Judy Luigjes;Ruud Smolders;Carlos-Eduardo Valencia-Alfonso

  • On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Matthijs Vink

  • Dysfunctional reward circuitry in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Martijn Figee;Matthijs Vink;Femke de Geus;Nienke Vulink

  • Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses.

    Matthijs Vink;René S. Kahn;Mathijs Raemaekers;Martijn van den Heuvel

  • Expectations and violations: delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control.

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Mirjam Bloemendaal;Mirjam Bloemendaal;Sebastiaan F.W. Neggers;René S. Kahn

  • Chronic effects of cannabis use on the human reward system: An fMRI study

    Hendrika H. van Hell;Matthijs Vink;Lindsey Ossewaarde;Gerry Jager

  • The Neural Substrate of Reward Anticipation in Health: A Meta-Analysis of fMRI Findings in the Monetary Incentive Delay Task

    Robin Paul Wilson;Marco Colizzi;Matthijs Geert Bossong;Matthijs Geert Bossong;Paul Allen;Paul Allen

  • Functional differences in emotion processing during adolescence and early adulthood.

    Matthijs Vink;Jolanda M. Derks;Janna Marie Hoogendam;Manon Hillegers

  • Contribution of the left and right inferior frontal gyrus in recovery from aphasia. A functional MRI study in stroke patients with preserved hemodynamic responsiveness

    Casper A.M.M. van Oers;Matthijs Vink;Martine J.E. van Zandvoort;H. Bart van der Worp

  • Common and unique neural networks for proactive and reactive response inhibition revealed by independent component analysis of functional MRI data.

    Janna van Belle;Matthijs Vink;Sarah Durston;Bram B. Zandbelt

  • Test-retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades

    M. Raemaekers;M. Vink;B.B. Zandbelt;R.J.A. van Wezel

  • Reduced Proactive Inhibition in Schizophrenia Is Related to Corticostriatal Dysfunction and Poor Working Memory

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Mariët van Buuren;René S. Kahn;Matthijs Vink

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional mri reveal cortical and subcortical interactions during stop-signal response inhibition

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Bram B. Zandbelt;Mirjam Bloemendaal;Mirjam Bloemendaal;Janna Marie Hoogendam;René S. Kahn

  • Cardiorespiratory effects on default-mode network activity as measured with fMRI

    Mariët van Buuren;Thomas E. Gladwin;Bram B. Zandbelt;Martijn van den Heuvel

  • HIV infection and the fronto-striatal system: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

    Stéfan Du Plessis;Matthijs Vink;John A. Joska;Eleni Koutsilieri

  • Frontostriatal activity and connectivity increase during proactive inhibition across adolescence and early adulthood

    Matthijs Vink;Bram B. Zandbelt;Thomas Edward Gladwin;Manon Hillegers

  • Reduced functional coupling in the default-mode network during self-referential processing.

    Mariët van Buuren;Thomas E. Gladwin;Bram B. Zandbelt;René S. Kahn

  • Within-subject variation in BOLD-fMRI signal changes across repeated measurements: quantification and implications for sample size.

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Thomas E. Gladwin;Mathijs Raemaekers;Mariët van Buuren

  • Striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia and unaffected relatives.

    Matthijs Vink;Nick F. Ramsey;Mathijs Raemaekers;René S. Kahn

  • Predicting Treatment Outcome in PTSD: A Longitudinal Functional MRI Study on Trauma-Unrelated Emotional Processing.

    Sanne J H van Rooij;Sanne J H van Rooij;Sanne J H van Rooij;Mitzy Kennis;Mitzy Kennis;Matthijs Vink;Elbert Geuze;Elbert Geuze

Frequent Co-Authors

René S. Kahn
René S. Kahn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nick F. Ramsey
Nick F. Ramsey Utrecht University
Marian Joëls
Marian Joëls University of Groningen
Martijn Figee
Martijn Figee Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Elbert Geuze
Elbert Geuze Utrecht University
René C.W. Mandl
René C.W. Mandl Utrecht University
Damiaan Denys
Damiaan Denys University of Amsterdam
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
Ruud Custers
Ruud Custers Utrecht University
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens a wide range of career pathways, both in traditional and online formats. Many students consider specializations that combine psychology with practical application, such as becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP). This role typically requires a master’s degree, clinical experience, and state-specific certification.

For example, the process of how to become a speech language pathologist in Missouri involves earning an accredited graduate degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing national examinations. Similarly, if you are interested in pursuing slp requirements in Montana, you’ll need to follow state guidelines for licensure and continuing education.

Each state has unique certification steps. To better understand Nebraska speech pathologist certification requirements or Nevada speech pathologist certification requirements, review comprehensive state-specific guidelines and available online degree options.

Online psychology and SLP programs can provide flexibility for working professionals. Researching each pathway will help you align your educational choices with desired career outcomes in the expanding field of psychology and allied health.

Best Scientists Citing Matthijs Vink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles