World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6730 6270 303 291 139 7563

Matthijs Vink publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthijs Vink between 1999 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthijs Vink published across 24 years, from 1999 to 2022, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2019. 8 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2019. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication
1999 2022

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthijs Vink: publications per year, 1999 to 2022
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 4
2005 4
2006 3
2007 3
2008 8
2009 7
2010 14
2011 10
2012 9
2013 13
2014 18
2015 14
2016 8
2017 12
2018 10
2019 19
2020 10
2021 7
2022 1
Total 176
Download as CSV

Matthijs Vink publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthijs Vink sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 139
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthijs Vink D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthijs Vink sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthijs Vink is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans numerous topics within these fields, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main fields of study associated with Matthijs Vink include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these broad fields, their research addresses several subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Education
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

The topics that frequently appear in Matthijs Vink's research consist of:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Matthijs Vink has published in various academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Acta Psychologica

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Matthijs Vink are:

  • "Towards an integrated account of the development of self-regulation from a neurocognitive perspective: A framework for current and future longitudinal multi-modal investigations," 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "The YOUth study: Rationale, design, and study procedures," 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "The YOUth cohort study: MRI protocol and test-retest reliability in adults," 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "Childhood trauma exposure and reward processing in healthy adults: A functional neuroimaging study," 2022, Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • "Disrupted upregulation of salience network connectivity during acute stress in siblings of schizophrenia patients," 2020, Psychological Medicine

Matthijs Vink frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Thomas E. Gladwin
  • Pascal Pas
  • Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol
  • Judith van Leeuwen
  • Christiaan H. Vinkers

Best Publications

  • A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

    Frederick Verbruggen;Adam R. Aron;Guido Ph Band;Christian Beste

  • Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Martijn Figee;Judy Luigjes;Ruud Smolders;Carlos-Eduardo Valencia-Alfonso

  • On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Matthijs Vink

  • Dysfunctional reward circuitry in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Martijn Figee;Matthijs Vink;Femke de Geus;Nienke Vulink

  • Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses.

    Matthijs Vink;René S. Kahn;Mathijs Raemaekers;Martijn van den Heuvel

  • Expectations and violations: delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control.

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Mirjam Bloemendaal;Mirjam Bloemendaal;Sebastiaan F.W. Neggers;René S. Kahn

  • Chronic effects of cannabis use on the human reward system: An fMRI study

    Hendrika H. van Hell;Matthijs Vink;Lindsey Ossewaarde;Gerry Jager

  • The Neural Substrate of Reward Anticipation in Health: A Meta-Analysis of fMRI Findings in the Monetary Incentive Delay Task

    Robin Paul Wilson;Marco Colizzi;Matthijs Geert Bossong;Matthijs Geert Bossong;Paul Allen;Paul Allen

  • Functional differences in emotion processing during adolescence and early adulthood.

    Matthijs Vink;Jolanda M. Derks;Janna Marie Hoogendam;Manon Hillegers

  • Contribution of the left and right inferior frontal gyrus in recovery from aphasia. A functional MRI study in stroke patients with preserved hemodynamic responsiveness

    Casper A.M.M. van Oers;Matthijs Vink;Martine J.E. van Zandvoort;H. Bart van der Worp

  • Common and unique neural networks for proactive and reactive response inhibition revealed by independent component analysis of functional MRI data.

    Janna van Belle;Matthijs Vink;Sarah Durston;Bram B. Zandbelt

  • Test-retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades

    M. Raemaekers;M. Vink;B.B. Zandbelt;R.J.A. van Wezel

  • Reduced Proactive Inhibition in Schizophrenia Is Related to Corticostriatal Dysfunction and Poor Working Memory

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Mariët van Buuren;René S. Kahn;Matthijs Vink

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional mri reveal cortical and subcortical interactions during stop-signal response inhibition

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Bram B. Zandbelt;Mirjam Bloemendaal;Mirjam Bloemendaal;Janna Marie Hoogendam;René S. Kahn

  • Cardiorespiratory effects on default-mode network activity as measured with fMRI

    Mariët van Buuren;Thomas E. Gladwin;Bram B. Zandbelt;Martijn van den Heuvel

  • HIV infection and the fronto-striatal system: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

    Stéfan Du Plessis;Matthijs Vink;John A. Joska;Eleni Koutsilieri

  • Frontostriatal activity and connectivity increase during proactive inhibition across adolescence and early adulthood

    Matthijs Vink;Bram B. Zandbelt;Thomas Edward Gladwin;Manon Hillegers

  • Reduced functional coupling in the default-mode network during self-referential processing.

    Mariët van Buuren;Thomas E. Gladwin;Bram B. Zandbelt;René S. Kahn

  • Within-subject variation in BOLD-fMRI signal changes across repeated measurements: quantification and implications for sample size.

    Bram B. Zandbelt;Thomas E. Gladwin;Mathijs Raemaekers;Mariët van Buuren

  • Striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia and unaffected relatives.

    Matthijs Vink;Nick F. Ramsey;Mathijs Raemaekers;René S. Kahn

  • Predicting Treatment Outcome in PTSD: A Longitudinal Functional MRI Study on Trauma-Unrelated Emotional Processing.

    Sanne J H van Rooij;Sanne J H van Rooij;Sanne J H van Rooij;Mitzy Kennis;Mitzy Kennis;Matthijs Vink;Elbert Geuze;Elbert Geuze

Frequent Co-Authors

René S. Kahn
René S. Kahn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nick F. Ramsey
Nick F. Ramsey Utrecht University
Marian Joëls
Marian Joëls University of Groningen
Martijn Figee
Martijn Figee Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Elbert Geuze
Elbert Geuze Utrecht University
René C.W. Mandl
René C.W. Mandl Utrecht University
Damiaan Denys
Damiaan Denys University of Amsterdam
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
Ruud Custers
Ruud Custers Utrecht University
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens a wide range of career pathways, both in traditional and online formats. Many students consider specializations that combine psychology with practical application, such as becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP). This role typically requires a master’s degree, clinical experience, and state-specific certification.

For example, the process of how to become a speech language pathologist in Missouri involves earning an accredited graduate degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing national examinations. Similarly, if you are interested in pursuing slp requirements in Montana, you’ll need to follow state guidelines for licensure and continuing education.

Each state has unique certification steps. To better understand Nebraska speech pathologist certification requirements or Nevada speech pathologist certification requirements, review comprehensive state-specific guidelines and available online degree options.

Online psychology and SLP programs can provide flexibility for working professionals. Researching each pathway will help you align your educational choices with desired career outcomes in the expanding field of psychology and allied health.

Best Scientists Citing Matthijs Vink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles