World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13348 12563 6789 6279 408 23007

Charles C. Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles C. Miller between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles C. Miller published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2001. 32 of the 445 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2001. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 27 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 13 publications
1985 2025

445 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles C. Miller: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 6
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 8
1997 8
1998 13
1999 11
2000 11
2001 27
2002 14
2003 15
2004 9
2005 13
2006 12
2007 14
2008 15
2009 13
2010 16
2011 4
2012 3
2013 11
2014 14
2015 21
2016 15
2017 24
2018 27
2019 26
2020 19
2021 19
2022 11
2023 8
2024 19
2025 13
Total 445
Download as CSV

Charles C. Miller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles C. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 408 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 408
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles C. Miller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles C. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1966 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1943 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Charles C. Miller is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to several specialized areas including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Hepatology, and Emergency Medicine.

Their work covers a range of main topics such as:

  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Trauma Management and Diagnosis

Miller has published extensively in notable academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Annals of Surgery
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care

Their recent published papers demonstrate a focus on surgical outcomes, diagnostic techniques, and treatment of complex conditions. Selected recent works include:

  • Mortality in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia, 2021, Annals of Surgery
  • Automated Large Vessel Occlusion Detection Software and Thrombectomy Treatment Times, 2023, JAMA Neurology
  • Less Invasive Mitral Surgery Versus Conventional Sternotomy Stratified by Mitral Pathology, 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Anti-diabetic effects of GLP1 analogs are mediated by thermogenic interleukin-6 signaling in adipocytes, 2022, Cell Reports Medicine
  • Coronavirus disease 2019 in an orthotopic liver transplant recipient living with human immunodeficiency virus, 2020, Transplant Infectious Disease

Miller has collaborated frequently with several researchers, contributing to a shared body of work. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Harleen K. Sandhu
  • Anthony L. Estrera
  • Ali Azizzadeh
  • Naveed Saqib
  • Chase J. Wehrle

Recognition for Miller's contributions includes multiple fellowships with the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), awarded in 1943, 1966, and 1994.

Best Publications

  • Fresh frozen plasma should be given earlier to patients requiring massive transfusion

    Ernest A Gonzalez;Frederick A Moore;Frederick A Moore;John B Holcomb;Charles C Miller

  • Repetitive, episodic hypoxia causes diurnal elevation of blood pressure in rats.

    Eugene C. Fletcher;Joachim Lesske;Wei Qian;Charles C. Miller

  • End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    Robert L. Levine;Marvin A. Wayne;Charles C. Miller

  • Age at acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection: a follow-up study from infancy to adulthood.

    Hoda M Malaty;Abdalla El-Kasabany;David Y Graham;Charles C Miller

  • Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome can be predicted early and are harbingers of multiple organ failure.

    Zsolt Balogh;Bruce A. McKinley;John B. Holcomb;Charles C. Miller

  • Carotid chemoreceptors, systemic blood pressure, and chronic episodic hypoxia mimicking sleep apnea.

    E. C. Fletcher;J. Lesske;R. Behm;C. C. Miller

  • Mortality and paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a risk factor analysis

    Joseph S. Coselli;Scott A. LeMaire;Charles C. Miller;Zachary C. Schmittling

  • Blunt traumatic aortic injury: initial experience with endovascular repair.

    Ali Azizzadeh;Kourosh Keyhani;Charles C. Miller;Sheila M. Coogan

  • Influenza epidemics and acute respiratory disease activity are associated with a surge in autopsy-confirmed coronary heart disease death: results from 8 years of autopsies in 34 892 subjects

    Mohammad Madjid;Mohammad Madjid;Charles C. Miller;Vladimir V. Zarubaev;Ivan G. Marinich

  • Three‐dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation

    Nizar N. Zein;Ibrahim A. Hanouneh;Paul D. Bishop;Maggie Samaan

  • Distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage for thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic repair: ten years of organ protection.

    Hazim J. Safi;Charles C. Miller;Tam T.T. Huynh;Anthony L. Estrera

  • Importance of intercostal artery reattachment during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

    Hazim J. Safi;Charles C. Miller;Christian Carr;Dimitrios C. Iliopoulos

  • The efficacy of thyroidectomy for Graves' disease: A meta-analysis.

    Tapash K. Palit;Charles C. Miller;Darlene M. Miltenburg

  • Outcomes of Medical Management of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

    Anthony L. Estrera;Charles C. Miller;Hazim J. Safi;Jennifer S. Goodrick

  • Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

    Darlene M. Miltenburg;Charles C Miller;Tara B. Karamlou;F. Charles Brunicardi

  • A double-blind trial of nocturnal supplemental oxygen for sleep desaturation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a daytime PaO2 above 60 mm Hg.

    Eugene C. Fletcher;Rita A. Luckett;Sheila Goodnight-White;Charles C. Miller

  • Sympathetic denervation blocks blood pressure elevation in episodic hypoxia.

    Eugene C. Fletcher;Joachim Lesske;Juraj Culman;Charles C. Miller

  • Aerosol Delivery in Intubated, Mechanically Ventilated Patients

    N. R. MAcINTYRE;R. M. Silver;C. W. Miller;F. Schuler

  • Improved survival with pulmonary metastasectomy: an analysis of 1720 patients with pulmonary metastatic melanoma.

    Rebecca P. Petersen;Steven I. Hanish;John C. Haney;Charles C. Miller

  • Survival in COPD Patients with a Daytime PaO2 >60 mm Hg with and without Nocturnal Oxyhemoglobin Desaturation

    Eugene C. Fletcher;Claudio F. Donner;Bengt Midgren;Jan Zielinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Hazim J. Safi
Hazim J. Safi The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Louise D. McCullough
Louise D. McCullough The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Sean I Savitz
Sean I Savitz The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
John B. Holcomb
John B. Holcomb University of Alabama at Birmingham
Joseph S. Coselli
Joseph S. Coselli Baylor College of Medicine
Steven Warach
Steven Warach The University of Texas at Austin
Frederick A. Moore
Frederick A. Moore University of Florida
Scott A. LeMaire
Scott A. LeMaire Baylor College of Medicine
Heinrich Taegtmeyer
Heinrich Taegtmeyer The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Dianna M. Milewicz
Dianna M. Milewicz The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary medical career options is easier than ever thanks to flexible online programs. For aspiring healthcare professionals, online pathways offer accelerated learning designed to fast-track your entry or advancement in the field.

Those aiming for advanced nursing roles can consider programs such as the fastest dnp program, enabling quick progression for registered nurses seeking leadership positions. If you're looking for coursework online, a variety of dnp programs online offer flexible schedules to fit your existing commitments.

Entry-level options are also available, such as online lpn programs for those starting in patient care. For those interested in mental health, the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs offer a streamlined approach to becoming a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner.

By combining medical studies in the USA with these online degree options, you can shape a career pathway that aligns with your interests and professional ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Charles C. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles