World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 34 2844 2668 76 75 88 4809

Prasenjit Chatterjee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Prasenjit Chatterjee between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Prasenjit Chatterjee published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 15.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 87 publications in 2023. 31 of the 275 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 87. Peak 87 publications in 2023. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 87 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 2 publications
2009 2026

275 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Prasenjit Chatterjee: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 1
2011 4
2012 6
2013 7
2014 5
2015 1
2016 5
2017 6
2018 6
2019 20
2020 12
2021 25
2022 24
2023 87
2024 34
2025 29
2026 2
Total 275
Download as CSV

Prasenjit Chatterjee publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prasenjit Chatterjee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 88 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67 88
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Prasenjit Chatterjee D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prasenjit Chatterjee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189 34
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Prasenjit Chatterjee is affiliated with the Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology in India. Their research focuses on fields including Engineering, Decision Sciences, and Business, Management and Accounting, with subfields emphasizing Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their primary research topics include Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Optimization and Mathematical Programming, Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management, Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques, and Quality Function Deployment in Product Design.

Prasenjit Chatterjee has contributed to multiple publications, including work in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Informatica, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering, and Facta Universitatis Series Mechanical Engineering.

  • An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe (2021), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
  • Sustainable supplier selection using combined FUCOM - Rough SAW model (2020), Reports in Mechanical Engineering
  • Sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making: A state-of-the-art research perspective using bibliometric analysis (2023), Expert Systems with Applications
  • An interval valued neutrosophic decision-making structure for sustainable supplier selection (2021), Expert Systems with Applications
  • Eliminating Rank Reversal Problem Using a New Multi-Attribute Model-The RAFSI Method (2020), Mathematics

The scientist frequently collaborates with co-authors such as Shankar Chakraborty, Partha Protim Das, Dragan Pamučar, Morteza Yazdani, and Shervin Zakeri.

In addition to journal articles, Prasenjit Chatterjee has authored numerous books, predominantly published by Apple Academic Press eBooks. Notable titles include Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Manufacturing Environments (2023), Precision Agriculture for Sustainability (2023), Decision-Making Models and Applications in Manufacturing Environments (2023), Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Business and Finance (2021), Electro-Micromachining and Microfabrication (2024), and Optimization Methods for Engineering Problems (2023). Other publishers include Springer Science+Business Media and Springer Nature, with titles like Computational Intelligence for Engineering and Management Applications (2023) and Computational Intelligence for Modern Business Systems (2023).

Best Publications

  • Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection

    Morteza Yazdani;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani

  • Material selection using preferential ranking methods

    Prasenjit Chatterjee;Shankar Chakraborty

  • Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods

    Prasenjit Chatterjee;Vijay Manikrao Athawale;Shankar Chakraborty

  • Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method

    Saikat Ranjan Maity;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Shankar Chakraborty

  • A comparative analysis of VIKOR method and its variants

    Prasenjit Chatterjee;Shankar Chakraborty

  • A novel integrated decision-making approach for the evaluation and selection of renewable energy technologies

    Morteza Yazdani;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Dalia Streimikiene

  • Gear Material Selection using Complex Proportional Assessment and Additive Ratio Assessment-based Approaches: A Comparative Study

    Prasenjit Chatterjee;Shankar Chakraborty

  • A NOVEL HYBRID METHOD FOR NON-TRADITIONAL MACHINING PROCESS SELECTION USING FACTOR RELATIONSHIP AND MULTI-ATTRIBUTIVE BORDER APPROXIMATION METHOD

    Prasenjit Chatterjee;Supraksh Mondal;Soumava Boral;Arnab Banerjee

  • A new fuzzy methodology-based structured framework for RAM and risk analysis

    Dilbagh Panchal;Anupam K. Singh;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

  • Selection of commercially available alternative passenger vehicle in automotive environment

    Tapas Biswas;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Bikash Choudhuri

  • Evaluating performance of engineering departments in an Indian University using DEMATEL and compromise ranking methods

    Rajeev Ranjan;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Shankar Chakraborty

  • Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Manufacturing Environments

    Unknown

  • Development of a hybrid meta-model for material selection using design of experiments and EDAS method

    Prasenjit Chatterjee;Arnab Banerjee;Supraksh Mondal;Soumava Boral

  • A TWO-PHASE MODEL FOR SUPPLIER EVALUATION IN MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT

    Prasenjit Chatterjee;Željko Stević

  • Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking method

    Vijay Manikrao Athawale;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Shankar Chakraborty

  • An Integrated DEMATEL–VIKOR Method-Based Approach for Cotton Fibre Selection and Evaluation

    Shankar Chakraborty;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Kanika Prasad

  • Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Techniques for Business Processes Information Management

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Prasenjit Chatterjee

  • Nontraditional machining processes selection using evaluation of mixed data method

    Prasenjit Chatterjee;Shankar Chakraborty

  • An Integrated Methodology for Evaluation of Electric Vehicles Under Sustainable Automotive Environment

    Tapas Kumar Biswas;Željko Stević;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Morteza Yazdani

  • AN INTEGRATED DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF THE FORKLIFTS IN WAREHOUSING SYSTEMS

    Eldina Mahmutagić;Željko Stević;Zdravko Nunić;Prasenjit Chatterjee

  • A comparative study of preference dominance-based approaches for selection of industrial robots

    P. Chatterjee;S. Mondal;S. Chakraborty

  • Intelligent Decision Making Tools in Manufacturing Technology Selection

    Morteza Yazdani;Prasenjit Chatterjee

  • Prediction of Responses in a Sustainable Dry Turning Operation: A Comparative Analysis

    Shibaprasad Bhattacharya;Partha Protim Das;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Shankar Chakraborty

  • Sustainable oil selection for cleaner production in Indian foundry industries: A three phase integrated decision-making framework

    Dilbagh Panchal;Prasenjit Chatterjee;Rohit Sharma;Rajiv Kumar Garg

Frequent Co-Authors

Shankar Chakraborty
Shankar Chakraborty Jadavpur University
Dragan Pamučar
Dragan Pamučar University of Belgrade
Željko Stević
Željko Stević University of East Sarajevo
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Madjid Tavana
Madjid Tavana La Salle University
Dalia Streimikiene
Dalia Streimikiene Lithuanian Energy Institute
Jurgita Antucheviciene
Jurgita Antucheviciene Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Fatih Ecer
Fatih Ecer Afyon Kocatepe University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Veterans, for example, may benefit from specialized programs such as speech pathology programs online for veterans, which offer flexible learning options tailored to their unique needs.

Accelerated pathways are also available for individuals seeking to fast-track their education. Programs like accelerated slp programs enable students to complete degrees at a quicker pace, making them ideal for those eager to enter the workforce.

Beyond engineering, understanding human behavior is crucial in some specialized roles. Careers such as those in the FBI behavioral analysis unit blend scientific knowledge with investigative skills, highlighting the diverse applications of technical and analytical expertise.

Lastly, various types of counseling degrees offer insights into mental health and interpersonal communication, complementing technical degrees by enhancing leadership and teamwork capabilities.

Best Scientists Citing Prasenjit Chatterjee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles